30 Participants Needed

OPRA Prosthetic Device for Below Knee Amputation

(TOSS Trial)

AM
TL
Overseen ByToby L Perkins
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

Purpose: Aim 1: Quantify soft tissue complications and infections of service members with transtibial amputations treated with OPRA OI and compare them to transfemoral OI service members. Aim 2: Compare the validated domains, such as functional, quality of life and pain scores, from the preoperative baseline to follow-up visits to determine if persons with transtibial amputations treated with OPRA osseointegrated prostheses demonstrate statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements. Aim 3: Compare physical performance measures preoperatively to follow-up visits for persons with transtibial amputations treated with OPRA osseointegrated prostheses to quantify statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements. Aim 4: Quantify the biomechanical loading and bone quality changes that are directly associated with patient reported outcomes for persons with transtibial amputations treated with OPRA osseointegration. Aim 5: Compare outcome measures between persons with traditional socket prostheses (patients as self-controls) and OPRA OI devices as well as a comparison between persons with transtibial OI and transfemoral OI. Subject Population: Male and female military health care beneficiaries age 22 to 65 years old presenting with a Transtibial limb loss. Study Design: This is a 4-year, prospective cohort FDA pivotal study involving off-label use of the OPRA OI implant in persons with transtibial amputation. Procedures: SURGICAL PROCEDURES: Surgery Stage I: The distal part of the tibia is exposed, preferably using existing incisions, to produce an appropriate fasciocutaneous flap. By the use of fluoroscopy and guiding devices the correct position of the fixture in the medullary canal is found. The canal is reamed step by step to a proper diameter to facilitate insertion of the implant. If the bone quality is poor, as determined by the operating surgeon, autologous bone graft from the iliac crest and/or the medullary canal is used. The fixture is then implanted into the intramedullary canal. Careful surgical technique is essential not to damage the tissue and to achieve osseointegration. A central screw, healing cylinder, and healing bolt are inserted. A myodesis is performed, and the wound is closed using suture. The sutures are removed 2-3 weeks postoperatively. When the skin is completely healed the Patient's conventional socket prosthesis could, in some instances, be used. Surgery Stage II (3-5 months after Stage I): The tibia is exposed via the incision from the Stage I-Surgery. The healing cylinder is removed and the tissues are trimmed in a way that the distal end of the bone protrudes a few millimeters. The skin will be attached directly to it. The endosteal canal is reamed to facilitate placement of the abutment. The skin in the abutment area is then trimmed to a diameter equal to the protruding end of the tibia. This is done to remove the subcutaneous fat and facilitate healing of the dermal layer to the distal end of the bone. The subcutaneous tissue is affixed to the periosteum using absorbable suture to prevent skin movement. A 8mm punch biopsy tool is used to create a circular hole in the skin precisely over the residual tibial canal. The remaining portion of the fasciocutaneous flap is sutured into position. A bolster dressing is placed and routine postoperative wound care is performed by daily dressing changes. Sutures are removed 2-3 weeks postoperatively. CLINICAL PROCEDURES A pre-study visit will be conducted up to 6 months prior to Surgery Stage I. Postoperative visits will occur 2-3 weeks after each surgery. Additional follow-up visits will occur 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-Surgery Stage II. It is standard of care to follow patients postoperatively from time to time to ensure the wound(s) is /are healing, surveil for complications, and ensure rehabilitation is progressing. That said, the sole reason for engaging in the Clinical Follow-Up Procedures is for the purpose of conducting research under this particular protocol. Additional visits may occur including x-rays at the discretion of the clinical investigator in order to monitor the participants medical status/bone healing. RESEARCH PROCEDURES Timepoints: Baseline, Post-Op Stage II, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months The patients will be assessed before and after the surgery regularly. Both performance and safety data will be recorded on specially designed electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs). Clinical and radiological assessments are performed preoperatively (in connection with the surgical procedures.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team to get a clear answer.

What data supports the effectiveness of the OPRA treatment for below knee amputation?

Research shows that the OPRA treatment, which involves attaching a prosthetic directly to the bone, can improve how well people walk and their overall quality of life. It has been used successfully for different types of amputations, and studies have shown that it helps patients use their prosthetics more effectively and comfortably.12345

Is the OPRA prosthetic device safe for humans?

The OPRA prosthetic device has been shown to be generally safe with a low complication rate. It has been used since 1990, and improvements in the rehabilitation protocol have reduced treatment failures.23678

How does the OPRA treatment for below knee amputation differ from other treatments?

The OPRA treatment is unique because it involves osseointegration, where the prosthetic is directly attached to the bone, eliminating the need for a socket. This approach provides better control, comfort, and sensory feedback compared to traditional socket prosthetics, which can have issues with fit and wear.12349

Research Team

BK

Benjamin Kyle Potter, MD

Principal Investigator

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for male and female military health care beneficiaries aged 22 to 65 with a below-knee amputation. It's not specified who can't join, but typically those with additional health issues or conditions that could interfere with the study might be excluded.

Inclusion Criteria

Eligible to receive care at Military Treatment Facility
DEERS-eligible
I am between 22 and 65 years old with a below-the-knee amputation.
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

The patient is not expected to be able to comply with treatment and follow up requirements
The patient's skeletal growth is not complete. Completed skeletal growth is defined through the finding of generally closed epiphyseal zones on X-ray
I am between 22 and 65 years old.
See 7 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

Up to 6 months
1 visit (in-person)

Surgery Stage I

Initial surgical procedure to implant the OPRA device into the intramedullary canal of the tibia

Immediate postoperative period
1 visit (in-person)

Surgery Stage II

Second surgical procedure to adjust and finalize the implant placement

3-6 months after Stage I
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

60 months
Regular visits at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-Surgery Stage II

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • OPRA
Trial Overview The trial tests OPRA Osseointegration (OI) in individuals with transtibial amputations over four years. It aims to assess soft tissue complications, improvements in function, quality of life, pain reduction, physical performance enhancements, and changes in bone quality due to the implant.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: OPRA implant legExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
The participants will have two stage surgical procedures to implant the OPRA device to the amputated leg.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
149
Recruited
33,800+

Findings from Research

The Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees (OPRA) offers improved function and quality of life for patients with extremity amputations compared to traditional socket prosthetics, as demonstrated in clinical trials.
The OPRA implant has a long lifespan and a low complication rate, making it a promising option for enhancing rehabilitation in amputees.
Osseointegrated prostheses for the rehabilitation of amputees (OPRA): results and clinical perspective.Hoyt, BW., Walsh, SA., Forsberg, JA.[2020]
Osseointegrated prostheses provide significant advantages over traditional socket suspension methods, including better weight bearing, improved joint motion, and enhanced sensory feedback for amputees.
The OPRA program has developed specific surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols for various types of amputations, showing promising long-term results for patients with transradial, transhumeral, and transfemoral amputations.
Osseointegrated prostheses for rehabilitation following amputation : The pioneering Swedish model.Li, Y., Brånemark, R.[2022]
A structured protocol for testing lower limb prostheses emphasizes safety, requiring users to meet specific graded safety levels before progressing to more challenging environments.
This approach aims to reduce the risk of falls and injuries, thereby enhancing user confidence and overall experience with active prosthetic legs.
Design of a stepwise safety protocol for lower limb prosthetic risk management in a clinical investigation.Thesleff, A., Ahkami, B., Anderson, J., et al.[2022]

References

Early fitting of the below knee amputee. [2022]
Osseointegrated prostheses for the rehabilitation of amputees (OPRA): results and clinical perspective. [2020]
One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses--rehabilitation perspective. [2022]
Osseointegrated prostheses for rehabilitation following amputation : The pioneering Swedish model. [2022]
Primary survival and prosthetic fitting of lower limb amputees. [2022]
Design of a stepwise safety protocol for lower limb prosthetic risk management in a clinical investigation. [2022]
Stability and Falls Evaluations in AMPutees (SAFE-AMP 2): Reduced functional mobility is associated with a history of injurious falls in lower limb prosthesis users. [2023]
Frequency and Circumstances of Falls Reported by Ambulatory Unilateral Lower Limb Prosthesis Users: A Secondary Analysis. [2020]
[Prosthetic management after amputation injuries of the lower extremities. Orthopedic-technical management]. [2022]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security