← Back to Search

Conventional 24-Hour 7 Lead Holter Monitor Recorder for Arrhythmia

N/A
Waitlist Available
Research Sponsored by Children's National Research Institute
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial
Must have
Be younger than 65 years old
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up 24 hours
Awards & highlights

Study Summary

This trial will compare the two methods of recording cardiac arrhythmias to see which is more effective.

Eligible Conditions
  • Arrhythmia
  • Fainting

Timeline

Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~24 hours
This trial's timeline: 3 weeks for screening, Varies for treatment, and 24 hours for reporting.

Treatment Details

Study Objectives

Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.
Primary outcome measures
Difference in Cardiac Arrhythmia Detection Between Recording Systems
Difference in Signal Quality Between Recording Systems
Secondary outcome measures
Difference in Skin Discomfort Between Recording Systems

Trial Design

2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Application of Carnation Ambulatory Patch Monitoring SystemExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
The patient will wear a Standard Holter Monitor and the CAM Patch system simultaneously for 24 hours.
Group II: Application Conventional 24-Hour Holter Monitor RecorderExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
The patient will wear a Standard Holter Monitor and the CAM Patch system simultaneously for 24 hours.

Find a Location

Who is running the clinical trial?

Children's National Research InstituteLead Sponsor
210 Previous Clinical Trials
207,707 Total Patients Enrolled
1 Trials studying Arrhythmia
16 Patients Enrolled for Arrhythmia

Frequently Asked Questions

These questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients, and have not been verified by our internal team.

Is enrollment for this clinical experiment open at the present time?

"According to clinicaltrials.gov, this trial has stopped recruiting patients as of July 26th 2022. The study was initially posted on November 19th 2020 and is no longer taking candidates. However, there are currently 103 other medical trials seeking participants."

Answered by AI
Recent research and studies
ChestJournal
Arrhythmias Detected by Ambulatory Monitoring
Clark, Pamela I., Stephen P. Glasser, and Edward Spoto Jr.. 1980. “Arrhythmias Detected by Ambulatory Monitoring”. Chest. Elsevier BV. doi:10.1378/chest.77.6.722.
Cardiac Electrophysiology ReviewJournal
[]
Heilbron, Emanuela Locati. 2002. “[]”. Cardiac Electrophysiology Review. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1023/a:1016322218490.
The American Journal of MedicineJournal
Prolonged Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Patients with Syncope
Kapoor, Wishwa N., Ruth Cha, Jacqueline R. Peterson, Harry S. Wieand, and Michael Karpf. 1987. “Prolonged Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Patients with Syncope”. The American Journal of Medicine. Elsevier BV. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90372-x.
New England Journal of MedicineJournal
Evaluation of Patients with Palpitations
Zimetbaum, Peter, and Mark E. Josephson. 1998. “Evaluation of Patients with Palpitations”. New England Journal of Medicine. Massachusetts Medical Society. doi:10.1056/nejm199805073381907.
~11 spots leftby Apr 2025
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top