Locking vs Standard Sutures for Surgical Wounds
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial tests two methods for stitching surgical wounds on the head or neck to determine which causes less scarring. One half of the wound will be closed with standard running stitches, while the other half will use running locking stitches, which might improve healing. Individuals undergoing head or neck surgery who can return for follow-up visits are suitable candidates for this study. As an unphased trial, it offers patients the chance to contribute to innovative research that could enhance surgical outcomes.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.
What prior data suggests that these suture techniques are safe for surgical wound closure?
Research has shown that continuous stitches, including locking stitches, are generally safe for closing wounds. One study found that about 3.6% of wounds closed with continuous stitches became infected. Both regular and locking stitches are usually well-tolerated and carry a low risk of infection.
Locking stitches hold wound edges more tightly, potentially improving healing and reducing scarring. However, experts continue to study the best methods for wound closure.
Regular continuous stitches are commonly used and considered safe. They are often the first choice for closing wounds, but if the thread breaks, the wound might reopen.
In summary, both types of stitches are generally safe and widely used.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores the effectiveness of different suturing techniques for closing surgical wounds. Unlike the standard running suture, which is commonly used for wound closure, the running locking suture technique may offer improved wound healing by providing more even tension distribution and potentially reducing the risk of wound dehiscence, or reopening. By comparing both techniques on the same wound, researchers hope to determine if the locking method offers superior cosmetic outcomes and better overall wound integrity. This trial could lead to advancements in surgical practices that enhance patient recovery and reduce complications.
What evidence suggests that these suturing techniques could be effective in reducing scarring?
This trial will compare locking stitches and standard running stitches for surgical wound closure. Research has shown that locking stitches can improve wound healing by reducing tension, potentially leading to less scarring. Studies have found these stitches to be generally safe and may lower the risk of wound complications. Regular running stitches are often used because they quickly close long wounds and distribute tension evenly. Both types of stitches are effective, but locking stitches might result in better-looking scars due to their design. While both methods are common, locking stitches could be more effective at reducing visible scars after healing.12346
Who Is on the Research Team?
Daniel Eisen, MD
Principal Investigator
University of California, Davis - Dermatology
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for patients undergoing surgery on the head and face. It's designed to compare scarring outcomes between two stitching techniques: standard running sutures versus running locking sutures. Participants must be eligible for this type of surgical procedure.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants undergo surgical wound closure using either running locking sutures or standard running sutures in a split-wound model
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for scar width, complications, and scar assessment using POSAS over a period of 3 months
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Running locking suture
- Standard running suture
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
University of California, Davis
Lead Sponsor