200 Participants Needed

Daily Goal Setting for Cognitive Health

JR
Overseen ByJessie Research Project Manager, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The purpose of this study is to determine whether interaction with an adaptive Fitbit-based goal setting application can increase levels of everyday light intensity physical activity in middle-aged adults.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if your medications prohibit participation in an exercise test, you may not be eligible for the trial.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Adaptive Daily Goal Setting, Interim Goal Prompt for cognitive health?

Research shows that setting specific and high goals can improve performance in brain-damaged patients, suggesting that goal setting can be a powerful motivational tool to enhance cognitive function.12345

Is daily goal setting safe for humans?

The studies reviewed do not provide specific safety data for daily goal setting interventions, but they do not report any safety concerns or adverse effects in participants with traumatic brain injury or other conditions.34678

How does the treatment Adaptive Daily Goal Setting differ from other treatments for cognitive health?

Adaptive Daily Goal Setting is unique because it focuses on training individuals to use self-regulatory strategies to manage and achieve daily goals, which helps compensate for age-related cognitive changes. This approach is different from traditional memory training as it emphasizes practical application in everyday life rather than just improving performance on memory tests.910111213

Research Team

JG

Jonathan G Hakun, PhD

Principal Investigator

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for middle-aged adults aged between 30 and 70 with a BMI of at least 25, who can walk unassisted. It's not suitable for those with severe obesity (BMI over 50), neurodegenerative diseases, conditions that limit exercise, or visual/manual impairments affecting smartphone use.

Inclusion Criteria

I am between 30 and 70 years old.
BMI ≥ 25

Exclusion Criteria

I have been diagnosed with Alzheimer's or another brain disease.
I don't have heart or severe health issues that prevent me from exercising.
Health condition contraindicated for increased physical activity
See 8 more

Timeline

Calibration

Participants' average level of physical activity is calibrated by recording daily step counts for 14 days

2 weeks
Daily monitoring via Fitbit

Training

Participants receive the adaptive daily step goal mHealth intervention for 1 month

1 month
Daily monitoring via Fitbit

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for adherence and cognitive health at 1- and 12-months post-intervention

12 months
Assessments at 1- and 12-months post-intervention

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Adaptive Daily Goal Setting
  • Interim Goal Prompt
Trial Overview The study tests if an adaptive Fitbit-based app can help increase light physical activity like walking in midlife by setting daily goals. Participants will interact with the app to see if it promotes their cognitive health through increased movement.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: TreatmentExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Participants receive the adaptive daily step goal mHealth intervention plus interim goal setting prompts each day
Group II: ControlActive Control1 Intervention
Participants receive the adaptive daily step goal mHealth intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
515
Recruited
2,873,000+

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Collaborator

Trials
2,896
Recruited
8,053,000+

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Collaborator

Trials
1,841
Recruited
28,150,000+

Findings from Research

Both Goal Management Training and Identity Oriented Goal Training were well-received by participants with traumatic brain injury, leading to improved mood and goal attainment over a 6-8 week period.
Identity Oriented Goal Training effectively engaged participants in the goal-setting process, while Goal Management Training provided a structured approach to prevent errors during goal performance, although both methods were time-intensive for clinicians.
A pilot study of self-regulation informed goal setting in people with traumatic brain injury.McPherson, KM., Kayes, N., Weatherall, M.[2014]
The combination of modified Goal Management Training (mGMT) and the RehaGoal App was found to be feasible for helping individuals with executive function impairments after traumatic brain injury (TBI), with all four participants showing improvement in their self-defined goals over an 8-week intervention.
Participants reported excellent usability of the RehaGoal App, and the collected metrics data provided valuable insights into user behavior, suggesting that the app could effectively support rehabilitation efforts and may be suitable for larger studies in the future.
Guiding patients with traumatic brain injury through the instrumental activities of daily living with the RehaGoal App: a feasibility study.Ertas-Spantgar, F., Korabova, S., Gabel, A., et al.[2022]
A study involving 44 older adults (ages 60-83) demonstrated that a strategic memory training program effectively improved both practiced (word list learning) and non-practiced memory tasks (like grocery list learning).
Individuals with higher baseline memory capacity and better cognitive resources, such as processing speed, were more likely to benefit from the training, suggesting that personalized interventions could be designed based on an individual's cognitive profile.
The effect of strategic memory training in older adults: who benefits most?Rosi, A., Del Signore, F., Canelli, E., et al.[2019]

References

Goal setting and reaction time performance in brain-damaged patients. [2008]
The effects of goal setting on the arithmetic performance of brain-damaged patients. [2003]
A pilot study of self-regulation informed goal setting in people with traumatic brain injury. [2014]
Goal setting approaches and principles used in rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury: A systematic scoping review. [2018]
What are the barriers and facilitators to goal-setting during rehabilitation for stroke and other acquired brain injuries? A systematic review and meta-synthesis. [2022]
Guiding patients with traumatic brain injury through the instrumental activities of daily living with the RehaGoal App: a feasibility study. [2022]
Exploring the responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in relation to number of goals set in a sample of hemophilia-A patients. [2020]
Use of Goal Attainment Scaling to measure treatment effects in an anti-dementia drug trial. [2022]
Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary cognitive testing among older adults with mild cognitive impairment. [2022]
Boston cognitive assessment (BOCA) - a comprehensive self-administered smartphone- and computer-based at-home test for longitudinal tracking of cognitive performance. [2022]
Fostering Self-Management of Everyday Memory in Older Adults: A New Intervention Approach. [2021]
The effect of strategic memory training in older adults: who benefits most? [2019]
Variability in Cognitive Performance on Mobile Devices Is Sensitive to Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results From the Einstein Aging Study. [2023]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security