36 Participants Needed

Dynamic CO2 for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

SS
AA
Overseen ByAtqiya Aishah, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Brigham and Women's Hospital
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial requires participants to stop using CPAP or other sleep apnea treatments for 3 days before each study visit. If you are taking medications that depress breathing, like opioids or barbiturates, you cannot participate in the trial.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Dynamic CO2 for Obstructive Sleep Apnea?

Research shows that adding carbon dioxide (CO2) can help stabilize breathing in sleep disorders, including sleep apnea, by preventing pauses in breathing. In one study, CO2 therapy helped a patient with severe sleep apnea maintain normal oxygen levels throughout the night, suggesting it could be a useful treatment for similar conditions.12345

Is Dynamic CO2 therapy safe for humans?

Research indicates that CO2 therapy, used in various forms for sleep-related breathing disorders, has been tested in humans and shown to improve sleep quality without significant adverse effects. However, more studies are needed to fully understand its safety profile, especially in patients with heart conditions.23678

How does the Dynamic CO2 treatment for obstructive sleep apnea differ from other treatments?

Dynamic CO2 treatment is unique because it involves inhaling low concentrations of carbon dioxide to stabilize breathing during sleep, which can help prevent apneas (pauses in breathing) by maintaining CO2 levels above the threshold that triggers them. This approach is different from standard treatments like CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) that primarily focus on keeping the airway open.12346

What is the purpose of this trial?

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disorder that has major consequences for cardiovascular health, neurocognitive function, risk of traffic accidents, daytime sleepiness, and quality of life. For years, a "classic" model of OSA has been used to describe the disorder, which fails to capture it's complexity. Recently, a model for OSA called drive-dependent OSA was discovered be more prevalent in the OSA population. The drive-dependent subgroup benefits exclusively from increased ventilation, increased dilator muscle activity, and reduced event risk when drive spontaneously rises. This study seeks to provide direct evidence that reducing the loss of drive prevents the loss of ventilation, pharyngeal muscle activity, and thus the onset of OSA respiratory events, specifically in "drive-dependent" but not "classic" OSA. This will be achieved using CO2 delivered at precise times during breaths in sleep to prevent loss of overall ventilatory drive.

Research Team

DG

Dillon Gilbertson

Principal Investigator

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School

SS

Scott Sands, PhD

Principal Investigator

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults with diagnosed or suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are not currently experiencing unstable medical conditions. Participants should be using CPAP or similar treatments but can withhold them for 3 days before study visits. Those with a highly-sensitive gag reflex, severe claustrophobia, recent cardiovascular events, on certain medications like opioids, or pregnant/nursing women cannot join.

Inclusion Criteria

I use CPAP or similar for sleep but can stop it for 3 days before study visits, unless my job involves driving or operating heavy machinery.
I have been diagnosed with severe sleep apnea or show symptoms of it.

Exclusion Criteria

You are allergic to lidocaine, which is used for intramuscular electrodes and catheter.
Pregnancy or nursing
You have trouble falling asleep or staying asleep (insomnia).
See 7 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1-2 weeks
1 visit (virtual)

Baseline Sleep Study

Participants attend a baseline routine sleep study to confirm eligibility and establish baseline characteristics

1 night
1 visit (in-person)

Overnight Physiology Study

Participants attend an overnight physiology study with gold standard instrumentation to establish OSA phenotype

1 night
1 visit (in-person)

Dynamic CO2 Study

An overnight physiological intervention study dedicated to mitigating ventilatory drive decline with carefully-timed inspired CO2 stimulation

1 night
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after the intervention

2-4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Dynamic CO2
  • Sham CO2
Trial Overview The study tests whether precise CO2 delivery during sleep can prevent the onset of OSA respiratory events in patients with 'drive-dependent' OSA. It compares the effects of dynamic CO2 versus sham (fake) CO2 to see if increasing ventilatory drive helps maintain breathing and muscle activity in the throat.
Participant Groups
4Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Placebo Group
Group I: Dynamic CO2 within Drive-Dependent OSAExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
During sleep, before \~30 distinct respiratory events, we will administer \~2% CO2 for \~3-4 breaths.
Group II: Dynamic CO2 within Classic OSAActive Control1 Intervention
During sleep, before \~30 distinct respiratory events, we will administer \~2% CO2 for \~3-4 breaths.
Group III: Sham CO2 within Drive-Dependent OSAPlacebo Group1 Intervention
During sleep, Sham CO2 (air) will be administered for \~3-4 breaths before respiratory events.
Group IV: Sham CO2 within Classic OSAPlacebo Group1 Intervention
During sleep, Sham CO2 (air) will be administered for \~3-4 breaths before respiratory events.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,694
Recruited
14,790,000+

Findings from Research

Treatment of hypocapnic central sleep apnea requires a multi-faceted approach due to the challenges posed by a hyperactive respiratory chemoreflex, with options including sedatives for better NREM sleep and CO2 stabilization techniques.
Innovative therapies like adaptive ventilation, enhanced expiratory rebreathing space (EERS), and oral appliances can effectively manage complex apnea by stabilizing respiratory control and reducing the need for positive pressure therapy.
Alternative approaches to treatment of Central Sleep Apnea.Thomas, RJ.[2021]
In a study of 28 patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and chronic airflow limitation (CAL), 14 exhibited persistent awake hypercapnia (high CO2 levels), while the other 14 maintained normal CO2 levels, indicating variability in CO2 retention among patients with similar conditions.
The hypercapnic group had significantly lower oxygen saturation levels during sleep and were heavier, had narrower upper airways, and reported higher alcohol intake, suggesting that these factors may contribute to the differences in CO2 retention despite similar apnea indices.
Obstructive sleep apnea with severe chronic airflow limitation. Comparison of hypercapnic and eucapnic patients.Chan, CS., Grunstein, RR., Bye, PT., et al.[2016]
In a study involving six adult men with severe mixed sleep-disordered breathing, the addition of low concentrations of carbon dioxide (0.5% to 1%) to positive airway pressure therapy significantly reduced the respiratory disturbance index, indicating improved control of their condition.
The treatment was well-tolerated with no reported adverse effects, and it effectively normalized the residual respiratory disturbance index, demonstrating that carbon dioxide can be a safe and effective adjunct therapy for patients who do not respond adequately to standard positive airway pressure alone.
Low-concentration carbon dioxide is an effective adjunct to positive airway pressure in the treatment of refractory mixed central and obstructive sleep-disordered breathing.Thomas, RJ., Daly, RW., Weiss, JW.[2019]

References

Alternative approaches to treatment of Central Sleep Apnea. [2021]
Obstructive sleep apnea with severe chronic airflow limitation. Comparison of hypercapnic and eucapnic patients. [2016]
Low-concentration carbon dioxide is an effective adjunct to positive airway pressure in the treatment of refractory mixed central and obstructive sleep-disordered breathing. [2019]
Beneficial effect of inhaled CO2 in a patient with non-obstructive sleep apnoea. [2019]
Effects of stabilizing or increasing respiratory motor outputs on obstructive sleep apnea. [2021]
Central sleep apnea treated by a constant low-dose CO2 supplied by a novel device. [2023]
Cardiorespiratory effects of added dead space in patients with heart failure and central sleep apnea. [2019]
[Respiratory responses to CO2 stimulation in hypercapnic patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome]. [2016]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security