250 Participants Needed

SUPR vs 3D Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases from Cancer

Recruiting at 5 trial locations
RO
LM
HA
HA
Overseen ByHadassah Abraham
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: British Columbia Cancer Agency
Must be taking: 5-HT3 antagonists
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The primary objective is to patient-reported Quality of Life related to complete control of Radiation Induced Nausea and Vomiting (RINV) between standard palliative radiotherapy and VMAT. Secondarily, we will assess rate of complete control of RINV. However, the investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference in pain response between the two arms, because they are receiving the same dose.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, you must be prescribed a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (a type of medication to prevent nausea) before starting the trial.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment SUPR, Simple Unplanned Palliative Radiotherapy, 3D Conformal Radiotherapy, and VMAT for bone metastases from cancer?

Research suggests that Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) can improve the quality of life for patients by reducing the impact on normal tissues compared to 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT). VMAT is also shown to be efficient in planning and delivering treatment for bone metastases, which can be beneficial in a palliative care setting.12345

Is VMAT generally safe for use in humans?

VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) is a type of radiation therapy that has been used safely in various conditions, including lung and brain cancers. It is designed to minimize exposure to healthy tissues while effectively targeting cancerous areas, which suggests a favorable safety profile.23678

How does the SUPR vs 3D Radiotherapy treatment for bone metastases differ from other treatments?

The SUPR treatment, using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), is unique because it delivers radiation in a highly conformal manner, reducing treatment times and minimizing radiation exposure to healthy tissues compared to traditional 3D Conformal Radiotherapy. This approach aims to improve patient quality of life by decreasing treatment-related side effects and shortening the duration of each session.12789

Research Team

RO

Rob Olson, MD

Principal Investigator

British Columbia Cancer Agency

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults with cancer who have bone metastases and are receiving palliative radiotherapy. They must be taking a specific anti-nausea medication, have no more than three radiation fields needing treatment, and not be pregnant or breastfeeding. Patients should be able to complete quality of life questionnaires and follow-up visits.

Inclusion Criteria

I am prescribed medication to prevent vomiting before starting radiation therapy.
I am willing and able to complete study questionnaires online or on paper.
I may benefit from a specific radiation dose.
See 10 more

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnant or lactating women
Implanted electronic device within 10 cm of the RT fields
I have had radiation therapy that needs dose evaluation.
See 11 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Radiotherapy Planning

Planning for radiotherapy treatment, including CT simulation and treatment plan development

3 days
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Participants receive either SUPR or VMAT radiotherapy for bone metastases

1-2 weeks
Daily visits for treatment

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks
3 visits (in-person)

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • SUPR
  • VMAT
Trial OverviewThe SUPR-3D study compares the effects on quality of life between standard palliative radiotherapy (SUPR) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). It focuses on controlling nausea/vomiting from radiation and will also evaluate pain response, although no difference is expected in pain control.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: VMAT rapid (Arm 2)Active Control1 Intervention
Contouring: GTV based on available imaging (CT sim scan alone-no special imaging), expect to be between 1.5cm and 20cm clinically or from imaging. CTV-optional in all scenarios. If using CTV=GTV +0.5 to 0.7cm adjust to anatomy as follows: * If only bone involved: recommend not to expand past bone; but a 0.5-0.7cm CTV expansion outside of bone into muscle or soft tissue is allowed at RO discretion * If bone and soft tissue involved: 0.5 to 0.7cm CTV expansion is optional, allowed at RO discretion * If spinal metastases: CTV is optional. If used can include whole vertebral body at RO discretion PTV=CTV or GTV+(1 to 1.5)cm at RO discretion. PTV_eval=PTV cropped 0.5cm below skin. OARs: max 2 OARs permitted for VMAT arm. OAR constraints are at RO discretion. If lung/kidneys are within 5cm of PTV, absence of constraints for contours should be noted in treatment plans or dose constraint sheet prior to planning. PTV can be compromised for OAR at RO's discretion. Kidneys considered 1 organ
Group II: SUPR (Arm 1)Active Control1 Intervention
Planning according to local protocols. No more than 2 fields; no beam modifying devices, other than multileaf collimators (MLCs). Alternate weighting of beams allowed (ie. 1:2 AP:PA). Review of dosimetry not required, if performed as per institutional standard. Minimum of kV image matching on unit daily.

SUPR is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Palliative Radiotherapy for:
  • Bone metastases
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Brain metastases
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Palliative Radiotherapy for:
  • Bone metastases
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Brain metastases
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Palliative Radiotherapy for:
  • Bone metastases
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Brain metastases

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

British Columbia Cancer Agency

Lead Sponsor

Trials
181
Recruited
95,900+

Findings from Research

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for palliative radiation therapy to the lumbosacral spine was found to be dosimetrically superior, providing better dose conformity and homogeneity compared to traditional planning methods, with a conformity index of 1.2 for VMAT versus 2.0 for standard techniques.
Using VMAT reduced treatment delivery time to 1.5 minutes, similar to the fastest method (anterior-posterior parallel opposed pair), while also minimizing the dose to normal tissues, which can enhance the quality of life for patients undergoing palliative care.
Can Conformity-Based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Improve Dosimetry and Speed of Delivery in Radiation Therapy to Lumbosacral Spine Compared with Conventional Techniques?Javor, J., Robbins, M., Rosewall, T., et al.[2021]
In a phase 2 trial involving 69 patients with metastatic disease, palliative volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) showed less deterioration in quality of life (QOL) compared to 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) at 4 weeks post-treatment, despite both techniques being equally effective in pain control.
Patients receiving VMAT reported better physical, role, and social functioning, although they experienced more diarrhea symptoms compared to those treated with 3DCRT.
Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Palliative Volumetric Arc Therapy Versus 3-Dimensional Conventional Radiation Therapy.Wong, P., Lambert, L., Thanomsack, P., et al.[2021]
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) significantly reduces lung dose volume parameters compared to traditional 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), indicating improved safety for surrounding healthy tissues during lung cancer treatment.
VMAT not only achieves highly conformal dose distributions but also reduces treatment times by 37-63%, enhancing efficiency and potentially minimizing errors during the procedure.
Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of hypofractionated stereotactic lung radiotherapy: A dosimetric and treatment efficiency analysis.McGrath, SD., Matuszak, MM., Yan, D., et al.[2022]

References

Can Conformity-Based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Improve Dosimetry and Speed of Delivery in Radiation Therapy to Lumbosacral Spine Compared with Conventional Techniques? [2021]
Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Palliative Volumetric Arc Therapy Versus 3-Dimensional Conventional Radiation Therapy. [2021]
Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of hypofractionated stereotactic lung radiotherapy: A dosimetric and treatment efficiency analysis. [2022]
A Pre-implementation Study of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Same-day Planning and Treatment of Vertebral Bone Metastases Within a Rapid-access Palliative Radiotherapy Programme. [2021]
Actual gains in dosimetry and treatment delivery efficiency from volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for inoperable, locally advanced lung cancer over five-field forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy. [2022]
Volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for distal oesophageal malignancies. [2021]
Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients. [2020]
The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review. [2021]
Palliation of Vertebral Metastases with Radiotherapy: Exploration of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy From Development to Implementation in Routine Clinical Practice. [2020]