490 Participants Needed

Cryobiopsy vs Core Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Cancer

(COLD SNAP Trial)

Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop your current medications, but if you are on anticoagulation or anti-platelet therapy (medications that prevent blood clots), you may need to stop them unless it's aspirin alone. This will be determined by your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Cryobiopsy vs Core Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Cancer?

Research suggests that cryobiopsy, a technique that collects larger tissue samples, may improve the ability to diagnose certain lymph node conditions compared to traditional methods like EBUS-TBNA (a type of needle biopsy). This could be particularly useful for diagnosing rare tumors and diseases where more tissue is needed for accurate analysis.12345

How does cryobiopsy differ from other treatments for lymph node cancer?

Cryobiopsy is unique because it uses a cooling technique to collect larger tissue samples from lymph nodes, which can improve diagnostic accuracy compared to traditional needle aspiration methods that often provide smaller samples.12345

What is the purpose of this trial?

Cryobiopsy of peripheral lymph nodes with suspected malignant potential with comparison to standard core needle biopsy.

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults aged 18-89 with suspected or confirmed cancer and signs of cancer in peripheral lymph nodes as shown by imaging tests. It's not for those under 18 or over 89, on certain blood thinners that can't be stopped safely, if the node can't be reached for biopsy, if they prefer not to participate, have severe allergies to local anesthetics or antiseptics used during the procedure, have an infection at the biopsy site, or other safety concerns.

Inclusion Criteria

My scans suggest cancer may have spread to my lymph nodes, needing further tests.

Exclusion Criteria

Inability to reach the lymph node through a core needle introducer sheath as determined by the performing physician.
I am on blood thinners that can't be stopped safely, except for aspirin.
I prefer this treatment option.
See 4 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo FNA followed by either core needle biopsy or cryobiopsy

4-6 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after biopsy procedures

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Core Needle Biopsy
  • Cryobiopsy
Trial Overview The study is testing cryobiopsy against standard core needle biopsy in patients with suspected malignant lymph nodes. Cryobiopsy uses extreme cold to obtain tissue samples while core needle biopsy uses a sharp instrument. The goal is to see which method might provide better diagnostic information.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Experimental ArmExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
FNA followed by cryobiopsy through a introducer sheath
Group II: Control ArmActive Control1 Intervention
FNA followed by Core Needle biopsy

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium

Lead Sponsor

Trials
6
Recruited
900+

Findings from Research

Cryobiopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes (cryoEBUS) demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield compared to conventional EBUS-TBNA, with an overall effectiveness of 92% versus 80%, particularly excelling in diagnosing lymphomas and benign conditions.
The procedure allows for better characterization of lymphoma subtypes and enables genetic studies in 97% of samples, while maintaining a safety profile with no serious complications reported, although light bleeding occurred in some cases.
Is the diagnostic yield of mediastinal lymph node cryobiopsy (cryoEBUS) better for diagnosing mediastinal node involvement compared to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)? A systematic review.Botana-Rial, M., Lojo-Rodríguez, I., Leiro-Fernández, V., et al.[2023]
Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) was successfully performed on 35 patients with suspicious mediastinal lesions, showing high diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 100%.
The procedure had a low complication rate, with only one case of pneumomediastinum that did not require further treatment, indicating that TBCB is a safe and effective method for diagnosing mediastinal neoplasms.
[Transbronchial cryobiopsy for mediastinal lesions: a pilot study].Danilevskaya, OV., Chernikova, EN., Esakov, YS., et al.[2023]

References

Is the diagnostic yield of mediastinal lymph node cryobiopsy (cryoEBUS) better for diagnosing mediastinal node involvement compared to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)? A systematic review. [2023]
Mediastinal Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma Achieved by Endoscopic Transesophageal Cryobiopsy. [2022]
Mediastinal "deep freeze"-transcarinal lymph node cryobiopsy. [2023]
Optimizing the endoscopic diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy: a glimpse on cryobiopsy. [2022]
5.Russia (Federation)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[Transbronchial cryobiopsy for mediastinal lesions: a pilot study]. [2023]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security