41 Participants Needed

Saline Lavage for Ankle Fracture

KP
KW
SL
JR
JF
Overseen ByJennifer Friend
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Duke University
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 1 JurisdictionThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of early, percutaneous, intra-articular saline lavage on the undiluted synovial fluid microenvironment during the acute phase following intra-articular fracture of the human ankle. We hypothesize that early intervention with percutaneous joint lavage in the first 0-48 hours after injury will attenuate the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, MMP's and cartilage breakdown products compared to non-lavaged control subjects at the time of surgical fixation.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Saline Lavage for Ankle Fracture?

Research shows that saline lavage, a technique where sterile saline is used to clean joints, has been effective in treating conditions like osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis by reducing symptoms and preventing infections. This suggests it may also help in cleaning and promoting healing in ankle fractures.12345

Is saline lavage generally safe for use in humans?

Saline lavage is generally considered safe, but there are rare risks such as venous air embolism (air bubbles in the bloodstream) as seen in a patient with Paget's disease. In a study on peritonitis, saline lavage did not increase complications compared to antiseptic solutions.13678

How is the treatment Saline Lavage for Ankle Fracture different from other treatments?

Saline Lavage is unique because it involves flushing the joint with a sterile saltwater solution to clean and potentially aid in healing, unlike other treatments that might focus on immobilization or surgical intervention. This method is similar to its use in other conditions like osteoarthritis, where it helps to clean the joint area, but it is not a standard treatment for ankle fractures.12359

Research Team

SA

Samuel Adams, MD

Principal Investigator

Duke Health

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults over 18 who have a specific type of ankle fracture where the break extends into the joint surface, and are treated at Duke University Hospital within 48 hours of injury. It's not for those with open fractures, injuries older than 48 hours, or non-surgical cases.

Inclusion Criteria

I am over 18 years old.
Must be treated at Duke University Hospital Emergency Department
I got injured within the last 48 hours.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have a broken bone that is exposed through my skin.
I sought medical help more than 48 hours after my injury.
I am under 18 years old.
See 1 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

0-48 hours
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Participants receive intra-articular saline lavage or no lavage within 0-48 hours of injury

0-48 hours
1 visit (in-person)

Surgical Fixation

Participants undergo surgical fixation and synovial fluid aspiration

Within 10 days post-injury
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase levels

1 to 2 weeks post-injury
2 visits (in-person)

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Saline Lavage
Trial OverviewThe study tests if washing out the ankle joint with saline soon after an intra-articular fracture can reduce inflammation and prevent cartilage damage compared to patients who don't get this early lavage before their surgery.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Intra-articular saline lavageExperimental Treatment3 Interventions
Subjects in Group 1 will then undergo saline joint lavage as follows: Subjects will undergo aspiration of the injured ankle joint via the standard anteromedial arthroscopy portal approach. This will be performed with sterile technique using a 16-gauge needle attached to a 10cc syringe. After synovial fluid aspiration, three 10cc syringes will be filled with 10cc of sterile 0.9% normal saline. Normal saline will be injected into the ankle joint and withdrawn from the joint via the existing anteromedial 16 gauge needle. After three rounds of lavage, 10cc of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine will be injected into the joint via the existing anteromedial 16-gauge needle. Subjects will undergo a period of soft tissue rest to allow for the resolution of soft tissue swelling. At the time of surgical fixation subjects will again undergo intra-articular aspiration of the injured ankle joint.
Group II: No intra-articular saline lavageActive Control4 Interventions
Subjects in group 2 will not undergo normal saline lavage.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Duke University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2,495
Recruited
5,912,000+

Findings from Research

A case study highlights a rare but serious complication of venous air embolism during joint replacement surgery, linked to the use of pulsed saline lavage.
The incident was attributed to the increased blood vessel formation in bones affected by Paget's disease, combined with potential air entry from the lavage equipment, emphasizing the need for caution in such surgical procedures.
Pulsed saline lavage causing venous air embolism in a patient with Paget's disease.Sides, CA.[2019]
Mechanical irrigation is effective in reducing bacterial contamination on various surfaces, with significant reductions observed for Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa across all tested systems.
The manual pump irrigator demonstrated the greatest efficacy in bacterial reduction, particularly on biological surfaces like bone and muscle, making it a practical and economical choice for surgical applications.
Lavage of contaminated surfaces: an in vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of different systems.Bahrs, C., Schnabel, M., Frank, T., et al.[2019]
In a study involving 299 knees from 205 patients with osteoarthritis, both joint lavage (JL) and joint lavage combined with glucocorticoid injection (JLC) showed significant reductions in pain severity over 3 months, indicating both treatments are effective for symptom management.
There were no significant differences in pain relief between the JL and JLC groups, suggesting that joint lavage alone can be as effective as the combination treatment for managing knee osteoarthritis symptoms.
Assessment of the efficacy of joint lavage versus joint lavage plus corticoids in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.Frรญas, G., Caracuel, MA., Escudero, A., et al.[2010]

References

Pulsed saline lavage causing venous air embolism in a patient with Paget's disease. [2019]
Lavage of contaminated surfaces: an in vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of different systems. [2019]
Assessment of the efficacy of joint lavage versus joint lavage plus corticoids in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. [2010]
Volume of a wash and the other conditions for maximum therapeutic effect of arthroscopic lavage in rheumatoid knees. [2018]
Use of lavage fluids in arthroplasty to prevent postoperative infections. [2014]
Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [2020]
The Effect of Povidone-Iodine Lavage in Preventing Infection After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [2021]
Antiseptic vs. saline lavage in purulent and faecal peritonitis. [2019]
Effectiveness of Lavage Techniques in Removing Immunogenic Elements from Osteochondral Allografts. [2019]