52 Participants Needed

Sonu Nasal Congestion Relief Study in Patients Suffering From Moderate to Severe Nasal Congestion

(SCORE Trial)

PG
Overseen ByParamesh Gopi, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Third Wave Therapeutics
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests Sonu, a headband that uses sound vibrations from a smartphone app, to help people with severe nasal congestion due to rhinitis. The vibrations aim to clear the nasal passages and make breathing easier. The device has been studied for its effectiveness in reducing nasal congestion.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What safety data exists for the treatment known as Sonu?

The available research highlights the importance of collecting and analyzing safety data in clinical trials, but it does not provide specific safety information about the treatment known as Sonu. It emphasizes the need for standardized safety data collection and reporting to better understand potential side effects.12345

Research Team

JJ

Jacob Johnson, MD

Principal Investigator

San Francisco Otolaryngology Medical Group

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

You experience at least two hours of nasal congestion within a 24 hour period.
You must be at least 18 years of age to participate in this study.
You have experienced a prolonged bout of nasal congestion prior to commencing treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

Head, nasal or sinus surgery within 3 months
You have a history of growths or masses in your nose.
You had a sinus infection or used certain nose medications in the last month.

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either acoustic resonance therapy or non-resonant acoustic energy for 15 minutes, twice a day, for two weeks using Sonu

2 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Sonu
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Placebo Group
Group I: Sonu Treatment GroupExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Patients will receive acoustic resonance therapy for 15 minutes, twice a day, for two weeks using Sonu.
Group II: Sham Control GroupPlacebo Group1 Intervention
Patients will receive non-resonant acoustic energy for 15 minutes, twice a day, for two weeks using Sonu.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Third Wave Therapeutics

Lead Sponsor

Trials
5
Recruited
280+

Findings from Research

The safety of marketed drugs is a significant concern, as some commonly prescribed medications can lead to serious or life-threatening side effects in patients.
The ChEMBL resource will provide a curated drug safety data set, including toxicity classifications and black box warnings, which will be freely available and regularly updated to aid in drug safety research and discovery.
Drug Safety Data Curation and Modeling in ChEMBL: Boxed Warnings and Withdrawn Drugs.Hunter, FMI., Bento, AP., Bosc, N., et al.[2023]
In the ICON8 ovarian cancer clinical trial, 51,019 adverse events were reported, but only 61% of serious adverse events were matched to existing adverse events, indicating a significant gap in safety reporting.
Re-analyzing safety data by including serious adverse events increased the detection of grade 3 or worse safety events, highlighting the importance of comprehensive safety data collection for accurate risk assessment in clinical trials.
Overlap between adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs): a case study of a phase III cancer clinical trial.James, EC., Dunn, D., Cook, AD., et al.[2021]
The ExtractEHR automated package effectively identified and graded laboratory adverse events in a cohort of 1,077 children with acute myeloid leukaemia and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, demonstrating its scalability and accuracy in capturing adverse event rates.
The study found that ExtractEHR reported significantly higher rates of laboratory adverse events compared to those manually reported in clinical trials, suggesting that automated systems can enhance the understanding of chemotherapy risks in pediatric patients.
Rates of laboratory adverse events by course in paediatric leukaemia ascertained with automated electronic health record extraction: a retrospective cohort study from the Children's Oncology Group.Miller, TP., Getz, KD., Li, Y., et al.[2023]

References

Standardized retrieval of side effects data for meta-analysis of safety outcomes. A feasibility study in acute sinusitis. [2019]
Drug Safety Data Curation and Modeling in ChEMBL: Boxed Warnings and Withdrawn Drugs. [2023]
Overlap between adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs): a case study of a phase III cancer clinical trial. [2021]
Rates of laboratory adverse events by course in paediatric leukaemia ascertained with automated electronic health record extraction: a retrospective cohort study from the Children's Oncology Group. [2023]
Complying with the European Clinical Trials directive while surviving the administrative pressure - an alternative approach to toxicity registration in a cancer trial. [2019]