200 Participants Needed

kTMP Brain Stimulation for Healthy Individuals

(SBIR_2022 Trial)

Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Magnetic Tides
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

Do I need to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment kTMP Brain Stimulation for Healthy Individuals?

The research on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a similar treatment, shows it can be effective for conditions like depression and neuropathic pain. High-frequency rTMS has been found to improve symptoms in these conditions, suggesting potential benefits for brain stimulation therapies.12345

Is kTMP brain stimulation safe for healthy individuals?

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which is similar to kTMP, has been studied for safety in both healthy people and those with certain brain conditions. Common side effects are usually mild, like headaches, and the risk of serious issues like seizures is low when guidelines are followed. Overall, rTMS is considered safe, but long-term effects are still being studied.678910

How does kTMP Brain Stimulation differ from other treatments for brain stimulation?

kTMP Brain Stimulation is unique because it uses theta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that can change brain activity quickly and for a longer duration compared to other methods. This treatment is non-invasive and targets specific brain areas to enhance or reduce their activity, which is different from traditional brain stimulation techniques that may not offer the same precision or lasting effects.1112131415

What is the purpose of this trial?

The investigators have recently developed a new non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) system, kilohertz transcranial magnetic perturbation (kTMP) that opens up a new experimental space for safely modulating neural excitability in targeted areas of the human brain. This project will characterize the broad parameter space of kTMP in terms of tolerability and efficacy in healthy individuals. Following earlier feasibility studies, we are now increasing our number of subjects in order to capture preliminary safety and effectiveness information on a near-final device.

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for healthy individuals aged 18-75 who haven't had a highly stressful event in the past day. It's not suitable for those with metal head implants (except dental), pregnancy, serious medical conditions, neurological disorders, brain surgery history, pacemakers, substance abuse issues, seizures or epilepsy history, head injuries or stroke survivors.

Exclusion Criteria

I have had a stroke in the past.
Pregnancy
I have been diagnosed with epilepsy or have had seizures.
See 15 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Baseline Assessment

Motor evoked potential (MEPs) amplitude recorded with EMG before kTMP stimulation to obtain baseline measures

0-15 minutes
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Participants receive kTMP stimulation to assess tolerability and efficacy in producing changes in cortical physiology

16 trials
1 visit (in-person)

Post-Treatment Assessment

Self-reported sensation/discomfort and MEPs amplitude recorded with EMG after kTMP stimulation

1 hour 30 minutes
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for any lasting effects of the kTMP stimulation

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • kTMP
Trial Overview The study tests kTMP—a new non-invasive brain stimulation system—against a sham (fake) version to see how well it works and how tolerable it is. The goal is to find out if this device can safely change brain activity without causing harm.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Placebo Group
Group I: active kTMPExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants received 0.5 - 8 V/m of active stimulation.
Group II: sham kTMPPlacebo Group2 Interventions
Participants received 0.01 V/m of sham stimulation.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Magnetic Tides

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2
Recruited
220+

Findings from Research

High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex is definitively effective for treating neuropathic pain, while high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is effective for depression, based on a comprehensive review of literature up to 2018 involving multiple studies.
Low-frequency rTMS has probable efficacy for various conditions, including improving motor recovery in stroke and quality of life in fibromyalgia, but the overall clinical relevance of rTMS benefits may vary and is not guaranteed.
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018).Lefaucheur, JP., Aleman, A., Baeken, C., et al.[2020]
In a study of 46 patients with drug-resistant depression, using a neuronavigated MR-less rTMS system allowed for targeted stimulation of different brain regions, leading to varying clinical outcomes and physiological effects.
Group 3, which received stimulation at a specific target, showed the greatest reduction in depression symptoms (66.94% decrease in HAM-D scores), suggesting that precise targeting in rTMS can enhance treatment efficacy.
The use of MR‑less MNI based neuronavigation for 10 Hz rTMS depression therapy: electrophysiological and clinical implications.Valiulis, V., Gerulskis, G., Dapšys, K., et al.[2019]
In a study involving 33 patients undergoing rTMS treatment, the sham condition used was effective as most participants could not distinguish between real and sham stimulation, indicating its suitability for clinical trials.
Both groups, those receiving real stimulation and those receiving sham, showed a high willingness to recommend rTMS to others, suggesting that the treatment is perceived positively regardless of the actual stimulation received.
Sham or real--post hoc estimation of stimulation condition in a randomized transcranial magnetic stimulation trial.Herwig, U., Cardenas-Morales, L., Connemann, BJ., et al.[2015]

References

Analgesic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in neuropathic pain: influence of theta burst stimulation priming. [2022]
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). [2020]
The use of MR‑less MNI based neuronavigation for 10 Hz rTMS depression therapy: electrophysiological and clinical implications. [2019]
Cognitive effects of precentral cortical stimulation for pain control: an ERP study. [2019]
Sham or real--post hoc estimation of stimulation condition in a randomized transcranial magnetic stimulation trial. [2015]
Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature. [2022]
Safety Review for Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. [2023]
A review of the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a clinical treatment for depression. [2021]
Safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with implanted cortical electrodes. An ex-vivo study and report of a case. [2019]
Image-guided TMS is safe in a predominately pediatric clinical population. [2022]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Exploring the after-effects of theta burst magnetic stimulation on the human motor cortex: a functional imaging study. [2022]
Modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials using transcranial magnetic intermittent theta burst stimulation. [2008]
Intra- and Inter-Regional Priming of Ipsilateral Human Primary Motor Cortex With Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Does Not Induce Consistent Neuroplastic Effects. [2020]
14.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. [2022]
Local Differences in Cortical Excitability - A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component. [2021]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security