← Back to Search

Behavioural Intervention

Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretations (CBM-I) for Anxiety Disorders

N/A
Waitlist Available
Led By Michelle S Rozenman, Ph.D.
Research Sponsored by University of Denver
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial
Must have
Be younger than 18 years old
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up baseline, 6 weeks
Awards & highlights

Study Summary

This trial will test the effects of an experimental computerized intervention aimed at reducing threat-based thinking in anxious youth.

Timeline

Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~baseline, 6 weeks
This trial's timeline: 3 weeks for screening, Varies for treatment, and baseline, 6 weeks for reporting.

Treatment Details

Study Objectives

Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.
Primary outcome measures
Change in linguistic interpretation bias as assessed by the word-sentence association paradigm for youth (WSAP-Y)
Change in self-reported interpretation bias as measured by the Children's Automatic Thoughts Scale (CATS)
Change in visual interpretation bias as assessed by the ambiguous faces task
Secondary outcome measures
Feasibility of CBM-I: Proportion of CBM-I trainings completed of 16 intended sessions.
Participant/Parent Acceptability Questionnaire (PAQ)

Trial Design

2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Placebo Group
Group I: Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretations (CBM-I)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Computerized 16-session intervention aimed at reducing interpretation bias. In this study, CBM-I is personalized to youth anxiety symptoms. During CBM-I sessions, youth indicate whether word-sentence pairs are related, and are provided with feedback aimed to reduce bias.
Group II: Interpretation Control Condition (ICC)Placebo Group1 Intervention
Computerized 16-session intervention that is not believed to significantly modify bias. In this study, youth see stimuli personalized to their anxiety symptoms. During ICC sessions, youth see word-sentence pairs and are required to indicate whether word and sentence are related, but are not provided with feedback that aims to "train" a reduction in interpretation bias.

Find a Location

Who is running the clinical trial?

University of DenverLead Sponsor
23 Previous Clinical Trials
10,191 Total Patients Enrolled
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)NIH
2,784 Previous Clinical Trials
2,689,225 Total Patients Enrolled
157 Trials studying Anxiety Disorders
65,338 Patients Enrolled for Anxiety Disorders
University of California, Los AngelesOTHER
1,530 Previous Clinical Trials
10,278,152 Total Patients Enrolled
31 Trials studying Anxiety Disorders
3,653 Patients Enrolled for Anxiety Disorders

Frequently Asked Questions

These questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients, and have not been verified by our internal team.
Recent research and studies
clinicaltrials.govStudy
Threat Interpretation Bias as Cognitive Marker and Treatment Target in Pediatric Anxiety
Michelle Rozenman 2020. "Threat Interpretation Bias as Cognitive Marker and Treatment Target in Pediatric Anxiety". ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04245501.
~10 spots leftby Apr 2025
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top