50 Participants Needed

CORI™ Knee Tensioner for Knee Replacement Surgery

Recruiting at 4 trial locations
MS
RW
NE
LA
KM
LS
Overseen ByLeann Speering, MS
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 1 JurisdictionThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

To evaluate the performance of the CORI™ KNEE TENSIONER as an accessory to the CORI™ Surgical System.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial team or your doctor.

Is the CORI Knee Tensioner safe for use in knee replacement surgery?

The CORI Knee Tensioner, used in knee replacement surgery, has been associated with improved outcomes, such as reduced manipulation rates, when compared to traditional methods. No specific safety concerns were noted in the studies, suggesting it is generally safe for use in humans.12345

How does the CORI™ Knee Tensioner treatment differ from other knee replacement treatments?

The CORI™ Knee Tensioner is unique because it uses a tensioning device that respects the natural anatomy and ligament strains of the knee, improving ligament balance during knee replacement surgery. This approach, combined with computer-assisted navigation, enhances surgical accuracy and reduces the need for postoperative manipulation compared to traditional methods.13678

Research Team

KA

Kelli Armstrong

Principal Investigator

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults over 18 who need a knee replacement due to conditions like osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and can follow up for one year. They must understand English, not be morbidly obese (BMI under 40), and have no active infections, severe joint diseases, or mental illness affecting compliance.

Inclusion Criteria

Subject agrees to consent to the study by signing the Independent Review Board (IRB) approved ICF
Subject is suitable for the CORI™ Surgical System
I need a knee replacement due to arthritis, bone death, deformity, or unmanageable fractures.
See 3 more

Exclusion Criteria

Participation in the treatment period of another clinical trial within thirty (30) days of the Pre-Operative Visit, or during the study
I am not pregnant, nursing, or if capable of becoming pregnant, I am using birth control.
I do not have an active infection or sepsis.
See 10 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Pre-operative

Pre-operative assessments including collection of baseline data and measurements

1 week
1 visit (in-person)

Surgical Procedure

Robotic-assisted TKA procedure with the CORI Surgical System and CORI™ KNEE TENSIONER

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

12 months
4 visits (in-person) at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • REAL INTELLIGENCE Tensioner
Trial OverviewThe CORI™ KNEE TENSIONER's performance is being tested as an accessory to the CORI™ Surgical System during knee replacement surgeries. The study aims to assess how well it works with the surgical system in improving surgery outcomes.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: CORI TENSIONERExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Subjects having a robotic TKA procedure with the CORI Surgical System, including the use of the CORI™ KNEE TENSIONER accessory.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Lead Sponsor

Trials
176
Recruited
23,500+
Dr. Maria Berkman profile image

Dr. Maria Berkman

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Chief Medical Officer since 2023

MD from Harvard Medical School

Dr. Deepak Nath profile image

Dr. Deepak Nath

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Chief Executive Officer since 2022

PhD in Theoretical Mechanics, University of California, Berkeley

Findings from Research

In a study of 5,486 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) using image-derived instrumentation (IDI), there was no significant difference in the overall revision rates at 5 years compared to computer-navigated and other standard methods, with revision rates of 3.3% for IDI, 2.4% for computer navigation, and 2.5% for other methods.
However, the IDI method was associated with higher revision rates in specific cases, particularly for posterior-stabilized TKAs and in patients aged 65 and younger, indicating that while IDI may not be worse overall, it should be used cautiously in these subgroups.
Impact of Image-Derived Instrumentation on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates: An Analysis of 83,823 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.McAuliffe, MJ., Beer, BR., Hatch, JJ., et al.[2019]
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) technology for knee replacement surgery allows for more precise planning and execution, leading to reduced surgical tray usage and improved predictability of component sizes, as demonstrated in a study of 88 patients.
The use of PSI resulted in more accurate alignment of knee components during surgery, although some intraoperative adjustments were still necessary, indicating that while PSI is promising, further development is needed for optimal soft tissue balancing.
[Total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Patient-specific Instrumentation].Köster, G., Biró, C.[2018]
The use of a novel ligament tensioning device in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) significantly reduced the manipulation rate from 16% with traditional methods to 7% when combined with computer-assisted navigation, indicating improved surgical outcomes.
Radiographic alignment data showed that all TKAs performed with the tensioning device were within 4 degrees of the desired position, demonstrating enhanced accuracy in knee alignment post-surgery.
Ligament balancing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: improved clinical results with a spring-loaded tensioning device.Swank, M., Romanowski, JR., Korbee, LL., et al.[2017]

References

Impact of Image-Derived Instrumentation on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates: An Analysis of 83,823 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. [2019]
[Total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Patient-specific Instrumentation]. [2018]
Ligament balancing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: improved clinical results with a spring-loaded tensioning device. [2017]
Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy. [2023]
5.Czech Republicpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[Use of Patient Specific Instruments at Total Knee Arthroplasty. One-Year Results of a Prospective Randomised Study]. [2017]
[Advances in soft tissue management in total knee arthroplasty. The use of imageless navigation systems]. [2018]
Soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty with a force sensor. [2022]
Is the Use of Spreaders an Accurate Method for Ligament Balancing? [2018]