88 Participants Needed

Prolonged Daily Fasting for Obesity

LC
Overseen ByLisa Chow, MD
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

Purpose: Obesity is reaching epidemic proportions, affecting 36% of the adult population in the United States. There is intense interest in dietary management to treat obesity and its associated complications. The first line of obesity treatment is caloric restriction (CR), although recidivism is common. For moderate CR, attrition rates of 20% are often reported, therefore weight loss options beyond CR are urgently needed.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial requires that you do not use certain medications that affect weight, such as beta-blockers, insulin, and others. If you are on these medications, you may need to stop them to participate.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Prolonged Daily Fasting for Obesity?

Research shows that intermittent fasting and time-restricted feeding, which are part of prolonged daily fasting, can be as effective as continuous calorie restriction for weight loss. Studies indicate that these methods help manage obesity by limiting eating to certain times, which can lead to similar weight loss results as traditional calorie-cutting diets.12345

Is prolonged daily fasting safe for humans?

Research suggests that prolonged daily fasting, such as alternate day fasting and time-restricted feeding, is generally safe for humans. Studies have shown no significant adverse events or changes in disordered eating patterns, making these fasting methods a safe option for weight loss in adults with obesity.12678

How is prolonged daily fasting different from other obesity treatments?

Prolonged daily fasting, which includes time-restricted eating and intermittent fasting, is unique because it focuses on limiting eating to specific times of the day or extending fasting periods, rather than continuously restricting calories. This approach can help restore natural body rhythms and improve metabolic health, offering a potentially more sustainable and easy-to-adopt lifestyle change compared to traditional calorie restriction.1291011

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults with obesity (BMI between 30 and 55) who have had a stable weight for the past three months, use a smartphone, wake up early, get average sleep, and have an eating window of over 14 hours. It's not for shift workers, pregnant individuals, those with certain medical conditions or abnormal lab results, history of eating disorders or using specific medications.

Inclusion Criteria

Own a smartphone compatible with the myCircadianClock (mCC) phone application
Eating window (time between 1st food intake and last food take) ≥14 hours using mCC
Self-reported habitual wakening between 5-9 am
See 5 more

Exclusion Criteria

Concern for active eating disorder per screening questionnaire
Illiteracy
MRI contraindication (metal in body, claustrophobia)
See 8 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo either Time Restricted Eating (TRE) or Caloric Restriction (CR) for weight and body composition evaluation

12 weeks
Weekly dietitian reviews

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Caloric Restriction
  • Time Restricted Eating
Trial OverviewThe study is testing if prolonged daily fasting can be as effective as traditional calorie cutting in helping obese people manage their weight. Participants will either follow Time Restricted Eating (TRE) where they eat during limited hours or Caloric Restriction (CR), reducing overall food intake.
Participant Groups
3Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Time Restricted Eating (TRE)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
For the TRE group, we will restrict the eating window to 8 hours, where they will eat ad libitum. This is the same interval established by Dr. Panda and by our preliminary data. This interval will be entered into the mCC app and participants will be asked to adhere to this eating window during the intervention. All eating occasions will be logged using the mCC app. Only water and medications will be allowed outside of the eating window.
Group II: Caloric Restriction (CR)Active Control1 Intervention
Participants randomized to CR will meet with the study dietitian prior to the intervention and be counseled on options to reduce their caloric intake by 15%, while maintaining their eating window. The 15% reduction was selected as our preliminary data and recent literature suggest that TRE with ad libitum intake reduces caloric intake by \~270 to 300 cal/day. The 15% CR is similar to the 11.9% CR achieved by the CALERIE-2 study, which is a 2 year study of CR.26 All eating occasions will be logged using the mCC app. The weekly dietitian review of the mCC information will include maintenance of the eating window and examination of dietary intake to determine compliance with the 15% CR.
Group III: Unrestricted Eating (non-TRE)Active Control1 Intervention
For the unrestricted eating (non-TRE) group, participants will eat ad libitum per their usual habits. They will receive initial counseling about mCC logging. All eating occasions will be logged using the mCC app.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Minnesota

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,459
Recruited
1,623,000+

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Collaborator

Trials
2,513
Recruited
4,366,000+

Findings from Research

Intermittent energy restriction (IER) was found to be a feasible and effective weight management strategy for adolescents aged 12-17 with obesity, leading to a significant reduction in BMI %95th percentile after 12 weeks (-5.6%) and maintained reductions at 26 weeks.
Participants reported IER as easy and pleasant to follow, indicating high acceptability, and the intervention also resulted in improvements in cardiovascular health markers, such as reduced carotid intima-media thickness and improved flow-mediated dilation.
Intermittent Energy Restriction Is a Feasible, Effective, and Acceptable Intervention to Treat Adolescents with Obesity.Jebeile, H., Gow, ML., Lister, NB., et al.[2023]
Intermittent energy restriction (IER) strategies, such as intermittent fasting and time-restricted feeding, show similar effectiveness in weight loss compared to continuous energy restriction (CER) in adults with obesity, based on a review of randomized trials lasting at least 8 weeks.
Out of 11 studies analyzed, 9 found no significant differences in weight or body fat loss between IER and CER, suggesting that IER can be a viable alternative for obesity treatment.
Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting and Time-Restricted Feeding Compared to Continuous Energy Restriction for Weight Loss.Rynders, CA., Thomas, EA., Zaman, A., et al.[2021]
Intermittent fasting (IF) may be an effective weight management strategy for overweight and obese adults, but its evidence base in humans is still limited, with only one published systematic review available.
Current guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) do not recommend very low calorie diets (VLCD) as a routine treatment for obesity, highlighting concerns about potential side effects and the sustainability of fasting approaches.
Intermittent fasting interventions for the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults aged 18 years and over: a systematic review protocol.Jane, L., Atkinson, G., Jaime, V., et al.[2022]

References

Intermittent Energy Restriction Is a Feasible, Effective, and Acceptable Intervention to Treat Adolescents with Obesity. [2023]
Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting and Time-Restricted Feeding Compared to Continuous Energy Restriction for Weight Loss. [2021]
Intermittent fasting interventions for the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults aged 18 years and over: a systematic review protocol. [2022]
Differential Effects of Alternate-Day Fasting Versus Daily Calorie Restriction on Insulin Resistance. [2020]
Associations between the timing of eating and weight-loss in calorically restricted healthy adults: Findings from the CALERIE study. [2022]
Safety of alternate day fasting and effect on disordered eating behaviors. [2018]
A randomized pilot study comparing zero-calorie alternate-day fasting to daily caloric restriction in adults with obesity. [2019]
Safety of 8-h time restricted feeding in adults with obesity. [2019]
[Research progress on the application of time-restricted eating in adult obesity and related metabolic diseases]. [2022]
Adherence to Time-Restricted Feeding and Impact on Abdominal Obesity in Primary Care Patients: Results of a Pilot Study in a Pre-Post Design. [2022]
Dietary and physical activity adaptations to alternate day modified fasting: implications for optimal weight loss. [2021]