← Back to Search

Corrective Exercise Program for Functional Movement Quality

N/A
Waitlist Available
Led By Kyle T. Ebersole, Ph.D.
Research Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial
Must have
Be older than 18 years old
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up pre-intervention (week 0), mid-intervention (week 3), post-intervention (week 5)
Awards & highlights

Study Summary

The occupation of firefighting is considered to be one of the most dangerous occupations in the United States (U.S.). As such, a high prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) have been observed among the firefighter population. This high rate of MSKI has created an extremely large financial impact on fire departments across the United States. Therefore, interest in developing methods of identifying those at risk for developing a future MSKI and interventions designed to prevent these MSKIs from happening has grown among both the firefighter population, as well as among researchers and practitioners. Previous research has demonstrated relationships between MSKI and altered movement patterns. In addition, researchers have started to demonstrate the ability of functional movement assessments to predict future MSKI in various populations, including firefighters. Two of these functional movement assessments include the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and the Movement Efficiency (ME) Test, which is a component of the Fusionetics Human Performance System. These assessments both quantify the overall functional movement quality of an individual by creating a composite movement score (i.e., Total FMS & Average ME Test scores, respectively). In addition, various theoretical models of corrective exercise programming have been proposed. These programs are designed to restore optimal neuromuscular control and correct any identified neuromuscular imbalances observed during the movement assessment through the use of simple and easy-to-follow exercises. The Fusionetics Human Performance System utilizes one such model, with the goal of improving the functional movement quality of an individual by correcting the aforementioned neuromuscular deficiencies observed during the ME Test. Based on this framework, these corrective exercise programs theoretically lower the risk of MSKI of the individual as well. However, there is currently a lack of research in the literature examining the influence of corrective exercise programming on functional movement quality among the active-duty firefighter population. As such, it remains unknown if a corrective exercise intervention is capable of significantly improving functional movement quality among active-duty firefighters. In addition, recent research suggests that various health and fitness measures are associated with functional movement quality. These measures include total body power output, lower extremity muscular strength, and core muscular endurance. As such, an examination of the influence of a corrective exercise intervention on measures of health and fitness among active-duty firefighters is warranted.

Timeline

Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~pre-intervention (week 0), mid-intervention (week 3), post-intervention (week 5)
This trial's timeline: 3 weeks for screening, Varies for treatment, and pre-intervention (week 0), mid-intervention (week 3), post-intervention (week 5) for reporting.

Treatment Details

Study Objectives

Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.
Primary outcome measures
Change in Dynamic Balance Ability
Change in Overall Movement Efficiency (ME) Test Score
Change in Total Functional Movement Screen (FMS) Score
Secondary outcome measures
Change in Core Muscular Endurance
Lower Extremity
Change in Range of Motion
+1 more

Trial Design

2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Corrective Exercise ProgramExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants in the Corrective Exercise Program (CEP) group (n = 28) will be given a four-week corrective exercise programming intervention.
Group II: ControlActive Control1 Intervention
The participants in the Control (CON) group (n = 28) will have their four-week corrective exercise programming intervention deferred for 4 weeks, and as such, will serve as the comparative group for the CEP group.

Find a Location

Who is running the clinical trial?

University of Wisconsin, MilwaukeeLead Sponsor
49 Previous Clinical Trials
6,582 Total Patients Enrolled
Kyle T. Ebersole, Ph.D.Principal InvestigatorUniversity of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Frequently Asked Questions

These questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients, and have not been verified by our internal team.
~5 spots leftby Apr 2025