10 Participants Needed

Contrast Agents for Detecting Liver Metastases

TM
SC
Overseen BySamuel Chang, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 4
Sponsor: University of Colorado, Denver
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to determine if a faster and potentially cheaper MRI method using gadobenate dimeglumine is as effective as the current method with gadoxetate disodium in detecting liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Participants will undergo two MRI scans, each using one of the contrast agents, to compare their effectiveness. The trial seeks individuals with colorectal cancer who have had prior imaging suggesting liver metastases but have not yet received any treatment, including surgery. As a Phase 4 trial, the treatment is already FDA-approved and proven effective, and it seeks to understand how it benefits more patients.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What is the safety track record for these treatments?

Research has shown that both gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) and gadoxetate disodium (Eovist) are generally safe for liver MRIs. Studies have found that MultiHance is well-tolerated by patients and effective for liver imaging, with no major safety concerns. Similarly, several studies have tested Eovist, confirming its strong safety profile. It is considered safe even for patients with varying kidney function.

Both contrast agents are widely used in medical imaging and provide reliable results without significant side effects. This makes them good options for those considering participation in a clinical trial focused on liver imaging.12345

Why are researchers enthusiastic about this study treatment?

Researchers are excited about using gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium as contrast agents to detect liver metastases. Unlike traditional imaging techniques, these agents offer enhanced sensitivity and specificity in identifying cancerous lesions in the liver, particularly those from colorectal cancer (CRC). This can lead to earlier and more accurate detection of metastases, potentially improving treatment planning and outcomes. Additionally, the unique properties of gadoxetate disodium allow for better visualization of liver tissue, which can be crucial for precise diagnosis and staging of liver lesions. Overall, these advancements in imaging could revolutionize how liver metastases are detected and managed.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for detecting liver metastases?

This trial will compare the effectiveness of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium in detecting liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Research has shown that both agents effectively identify liver cancer spread. Studies indicate that MRIs using gadobenate dimeglumine are 95.1% sensitive and have a 90.9% positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting liver cancer spots, demonstrating high accuracy in identifying cancer in the liver. In contrast, gadoxetate disodium detected more cancer spots than traditional scans in 40% of patients. Both agents perform well, but they might offer slightly different advantages in spotting liver cancer spread. Participants in this trial will undergo exams with both agents in a randomized order to assess their comparative effectiveness.34678

Who Is on the Research Team?

NM

Nikhil Madhuripan, MD

Principal Investigator

University of Colorado, Denver

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults aged 18-80 with colorectal cancer who have suspected liver metastases and haven't had any treatments, including surgery. It's not suitable for those with poor kidney function, non-MR safe implants, a history of bad reactions to gadolinium contrast agents, claustrophobia or movement disorders.

Inclusion Criteria

I have colorectal cancer.
Prior imaging with suspected liver metastasis
I have not had any treatment, including surgery, for my condition.

Exclusion Criteria

Previous reaction to gadolinium contrast agents
History of claustrophobia or movement disorders likely to impact image quality
My kidney function is severely reduced.
See 1 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Imaging Protocol Comparison

Participants undergo two complete protocol liver MRs for known or suspected CRC metastasis, one exam with gadoxetate disodium and the other exam with gadobenate dimeglumine, within an interval of 3-10 days, in opposite order.

3-10 days
2 visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after imaging procedures

4 weeks

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Gadobenate dimeglumine
  • Gadoxetate disodium
Trial Overview The study compares two MRI contrast agents: Gadoxetate disodium (standard care) versus Gadobenate dimeglumine (potential time and cost saver). The goal is to see if the latter can detect liver metastases from colorectal cancer as effectively as the former.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Gadoxetate disodium exam firstActive Control2 Interventions
Group II: Gadobenate Dimeglumine exam firstActive Control2 Interventions

Gadobenate dimeglumine is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as MultiHance for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as MultiHance for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Colorado, Denver

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,842
Recruited
3,028,000+

Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

Industry Sponsor

Trials
62
Recruited
9,500+

Diana Bracco

Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

Chief Executive Officer since 1999

Degree in Chemistry from the University of Pavia

Alberto Spinazzi

Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

Chief Medical Officer since 2023

MD

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

Trials
14,080
Recruited
41,180,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study of 140 pediatric MRI cases using gadoxetate disodium, transient severe respiratory motion occurred in 7.84% of non-sedated patients, which is lower than the 5-22% reported in adult studies.
No cases of transient severe respiratory motion were observed in sedated patients, suggesting that sedation may effectively eliminate this issue during imaging.
Rate of gadoxetate disodium (Eovist®) induced transient respiratory motion in children and young adults.Lanier, H., Wallace, A., Khanna, G.[2021]
In a study of 127 patients with liver nodules, gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium showed similar rates of arterial phase hyperenhancement, indicating both contrast agents are effective for this feature in liver imaging.
However, gadobenate dimeglumine was superior in visualizing dynamic phase washout and the capsule feature, suggesting it may provide better overall imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma detection.
Comparison of Visualization Rates of LI-RADS Version 2014 Major Features With IV Gadobenate Dimeglumine or Gadoxetate Disodium in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Allen, BC., Ho, LM., Jaffe, TA., et al.[2019]
In a study of 10,595 patients undergoing MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agents, the overall incidence of acute adverse reactions was low at 0.45%, with no severe reactions reported.
Younger patients were found to be at a higher risk for experiencing acute adverse reactions, and gadoxetate disodium had a higher incidence of reactions (0.82%) compared to gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.43%), indicating that while all agents are generally safe, some may carry slightly more risk.
Incidence and severity of acute adverse reactions to four different gadolinium-based MR contrast agents.Okigawa, T., Utsunomiya, D., Tajiri, S., et al.[2019]

Citations

MRI of colorectal cancer liver metastases: comparison of orally ...The metastasis-to-liver SI ratio was significantly higher after CMC-001 than after gadobenate dimeglumine (0.51 and 0.21 respectively, P < 0.0001). More AE ...
2.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30915560/
Detection of liver metastases on gadobenate dimeglumine ...The meta-analysis showed an overall sensitivity of 95.1% and PPV of 90.9% of gadobenate-enhanced MRI for the detection of metastases, when based ...
Contrast Agents for Detecting Liver MetastasesThe study demonstrated that using a combination of gadoxetic acid (GA) and gadobenate dimeglumine (GD) in liver MRI can create a 'plain-white-liver' effect, ...
Contrast agents used in MR imaging of the liverDetection of liver metastases: gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced three- dimensional dynamic phases and one- hour delayed phase MR imaging versus.
MultiHance®MultiHance is a paramagnetic contrast agent for use in diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated for: • MRI of the liver for the detection of focal ...
MultiHance in MRAMultiHance is a paramagnetic contrast agent for use in diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated for: MRI of the liver for the detection of focal ...
MultiHance® (dimeglumine gadobenate)Delayed, liver-specific imaging can be performed between 40 and 120 minutes following the injection, depending on the individual imaging needs.
Non-clinical assessment of safety and gadolinium ...Non-clinical assessment of safety and gadolinium deposition after cumulative administration of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance®) to neonatal and juvenile ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security