Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial explores how different settings of spinal cord stimulation, a therapy using electrical impulses, can relieve pain. Several groups test various stimulation techniques to determine which provides the best pain relief. Individuals who have used a Medtronic neurostimulation device for at least a month and can distinguish between their usual pain and other types are suitable candidates. The goal is to find the most effective way to use these devices to improve daily life for those with chronic pain. As an unphased trial, this study offers a unique opportunity to contribute to innovative pain management solutions.
Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.
What prior data suggests that Spinal Cord Stimulation is safe for pain relief?
Research has shown that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is generally well-tolerated. Studies have found that SCS can safely manage chronic pain. In one study, SCS was monitored for over two years and showed positive results. Some participants had their devices removed, usually due to insufficient pain relief rather than safety concerns.
Another report found that serious side effects were rare, though minor issues like discomfort or infections at the implant site can occur. These risks are usually manageable. Additionally, the FDA has approved SCS for certain types of pain, recognizing it as safe for those conditions.
Overall, SCS is considered safe for most people, but like any medical treatment, it may involve risks. It is important to consult healthcare providers to determine if SCS is a suitable option.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about spinal cord stimulation for pain management because it offers innovative approaches that differ from traditional methods like medications or surgeries. This trial explores various stimulation techniques, such as low energy, interleaving pulses, and high-dose cycling, which may offer more personalized pain relief. Unique methods like Differential Targeted Multiplexed (DTM) programming integrate advanced technology, potentially enhancing effectiveness for conditions like diabetic peripheral neuropathy. By tailoring stimulation parameters to individual needs, these treatments aim to provide more effective and targeted pain management options.
What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for pain relief?
Research has shown that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) effectively reduces chronic pain. This trial will assign participants to different cohorts to evaluate various SCS approaches. Studies comparing SCS to regular medical care have demonstrated significant pain relief and improved quality of life for patients with SCS over 6, 12, and 24 months. Another review found SCS particularly beneficial for individuals with long-term back and leg pain, highlighting its advantages after years of use. Overall, SCS ranks among the most effective treatments for managing ongoing pain.12678
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for adults over 22 with limb or back pain, who have had a Medtronic rechargeable neurostimulation system implanted for at least one month. Participants must understand English, be able to follow the study's procedures and document their experience. Pregnant women or those not using birth control are excluded.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants receive spinal cord stimulation with various programming settings to assess pain relief
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Spinal Cord Stimulation
Trial Overview
The SCS Research Study is examining how different spinal cord stimulation settings affect pain relief in patients with chronic limb and back pain. It focuses on personalizing treatment by assessing outcomes specific to each participant.
How Is the Trial Designed?
9
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Characteristics of vital signs in DPN participants
Effects of integrating Neuro Sense into DTM programming
Effects of longer cycle duration
Effects of decreased frequency and therapy cycling parameters
Effects of decreased pulse widths with increased frequency - with and without cycling parameters (different pulse widths and frequencies than Cohort 4)
Effects of decreased pulse widths with increased frequency - with and without cycling parameters
Subjects will be programmed to high dose (HD) stimulation with various cycling parameters
Determine effects of delivering ping pulses combined with governed pulses while using separate sets of electrodes
Subjects will be programmed to a specific frequency with a long pulse width at various amplitudes
Spinal Cord Stimulation is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada for the following indications:
- Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS)
- Adhesive arachnoiditis
- Peripheral causalgia/neuropathy
- Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD)
- Phantom limb/stump pain
- Ischemic pain of vascular origin
- Complex regional pain syndrome
- Pain after an amputation
- Visceral abdominal pain and perineal pain
- Chronic pain
- Neuropathic pain
- Spinal cord injury pain
- Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS)
- Adhesive arachnoiditis
- Peripheral causalgia/neuropathy
- Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD)
- Chronic pain
- Neuropathic pain
- Spinal cord injury pain
- Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS)
- Adhesive arachnoiditis
- Peripheral causalgia/neuropathy
- Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD)
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
MedtronicNeuro
Lead Sponsor
Geoff Martha
MedtronicNeuro
Chief Executive Officer since 2020
Finance degree from Penn State University
Dr. Eric Peterson
MedtronicNeuro
Chief Medical Officer since 2020
MD from University of Miami
Citations
The effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation combined with ...
This review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life outcomes associated with this ...
Spinal Cord Stimulation vs Medical Management for ...
This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy associated with conventional and novel spinal cord stimulation ...
Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential ...
compared conservative medical management (CMM) to SCS in this patient population (48 CMM, 52 SCS patients) and measured outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 months. SCS ...
Real World Characterization of Chronic Pain, Success ...
Spinal cord stimulation is an effective treatment for those experiencing chronic back and leg pain but requires a temporary evaluation ...
5.
janesthanalgcritcare.biomedcentral.com
janesthanalgcritcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s44158-024-00219-6addressing persistent doubts in spinal cord stimulation
Over the past 50 years, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as one of the most effective treatments for chronic pain.
Long-term Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems in A ...
Abstract. Aim: The availability of long-term (>2 years) safety outcomes of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) remains limited. We evaluated safety in a global ...
Spinal Cord Stimulation Explantation and Chronic Pain
SCS efficacy varies, with explantation rates reaching up to 38%, often due to inadequate pain relief. Most explantations occur within the first ...
SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA (SSED)
Effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain ... pain management: outcomes and predictors of revisions of spinal cord stimulators.
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.