235 Participants Needed

Inhaled Isoflurane vs. IV Propofol for ICU Sedation

(INSPiRE-ICU1 Trial)

Recruiting at 13 trial locations
MF
Overseen ByMagnus Falkenhav, M.D.
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial is testing whether inhaling a sedative gas called isoflurane through a special device is as safe and effective as the usual methods for adults in the ICU who need help breathing with a machine. Isoflurane has shown better control of intensive care sedation and seems to be a useful alternative.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you require IV benzodiazepines or barbiturates for seizures or dependencies, you may not be eligible to participate.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drugs Isoflurane and Propofol for ICU sedation?

Research shows that both Isoflurane and Propofol are effective for sedation in ICU patients, with studies indicating that Isoflurane can be a useful alternative to Propofol. Both drugs have been shown to provide optimal sedation with few adverse events, and Isoflurane may offer better control of sedation compared to Propofol.12345

Is inhaled isoflurane safe for ICU sedation compared to IV propofol?

Inhaled isoflurane and IV propofol are both considered safe for ICU sedation, with few adverse events reported. Isoflurane may have additional benefits like reducing time on ventilators and less impact on the liver and kidneys, but it requires specific equipment and training. Rarely, it can cause a serious condition called malignant hyperthermia, which needs immediate treatment.12346

How does inhaled isoflurane differ from IV propofol for ICU sedation?

Inhaled isoflurane is unique because it is administered through the lungs using special equipment, which may reduce side effects and improve outcomes compared to the traditional intravenous (IV) method used for propofol. This approach allows for more precise control of sedation levels and may offer additional benefits for ICU patients.12347

Research Team

KR

Kimberly Rengel, M.D.

Principal Investigator

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Eligibility Criteria

Adults over 18 who need mechanical ventilation and sedation for more than 12 hours in the ICU can join. They must require a specific level of sedation (RASS <0). Excluded are those with severe neurological issues, life-threatening conditions, allergies to isoflurane or propofol, certain heart problems, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and patients on other conflicting studies.

Inclusion Criteria

I am expected to need a breathing machine and sedation in the ICU for more than 12 hours.
I am on constant sedation due to my medical condition.
I am on constant sedation due to my medical condition.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

Ventilator tidal volume <200 or >1000 mL at Baseline
I am allergic or cannot take propofol or isoflurane.
I am receiving care focused on comfort, not curing my illness.
See 17 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either inhaled isoflurane via Sedaconda ACD-S or intravenous propofol for sedation while mechanically ventilated in the ICU

Up to 48 (±6) hours
Continuous monitoring in ICU

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including mortality and cognitive recovery assessments

6 months

Long-term follow-up

Participants' mortality and other outcomes are assessed at 3 and 6 months post-randomization

6 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Isoflurane
  • Propofol
Trial OverviewThe trial compares two types of sedatives: inhaled isoflurane using Sedaconda ACD-S versus intravenous propofol. It aims to determine which one is safer and more effective for keeping ICU patients under sedation while they're on a ventilator.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: IsofluraneExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Inhaled isoflurane administered via Sedaconda ACD-S
Group II: PropofolActive Control1 Intervention
Propofol administered as intravenous infusion

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Sedana Medical

Lead Sponsor

Trials
5
Recruited
900+

Findings from Research

Inhaled sedation using agents like isoflurane and sevoflurane is now possible in ICU settings, offering a well-tolerated and adjustable sedation option for patients, provided that proper equipment and training are available.
These inhaled agents not only serve as effective sedatives but may also offer additional clinical benefits for ICU patients, suggesting a promising alternative to traditional intravenous sedation methods.
Inhaled sedation in the intensive care unit.Jabaudon, M., Zhai, R., Blondonnet, R., et al.[2022]

References

Inhaled sedation in the intensive care unit. [2022]
Isoflurane and propofol for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit. A crossover study. [2019]
Survival after long-term isoflurane sedation as opposed to intravenous sedation in critically ill surgical patients: Retrospective analysis. [2017]
Inhaled isoflurane via the anaesthetic conserving device versus propofol for sedation of invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units in Germany and Slovenia: an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. [2022]
5.United Arab Emiratespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Sedation in PACU: the role of propofol. [2019]
Inhaled Sedation with Volatile Anesthetics for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Narrative Review. [2023]
The advantages of inhalational sedation using an anesthetic-conserving device versus intravenous sedatives in an intensive care unit setting: A systematic review. [2023]