IMRT for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Not currently recruiting at 7 trial locations
CD
AG
Overseen ByAnthony Griffin, MSc
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial explores how radiation therapy, administered either before or after surgery, affects wound healing in individuals with soft tissue sarcoma—a cancer affecting muscles, fat, nerves, and blood vessels—in the arms, legs, or trunk. One group will receive preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (before surgery), while the other will receive postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (after surgery). The trial aims to determine if the timing of radiation treatment impacts short-term healing post-surgery. Individuals diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma in these areas who are ready for surgery and radiation therapy may qualify for this trial. As a Phase 3 trial, this study represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants the opportunity to contribute to potentially groundbreaking treatment advancements.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are planning to undergo chemotherapy, you would not be eligible for this trial.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Studies have shown that preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is generally well-tolerated. This type of radiation therapy targets tumors more precisely, and research indicates it has similar rates of wound complications and late side effects compared to other methods. Previous studies suggest that patients experience manageable side effects.

For postoperative IMRT, research also supports its safety. It provides good tumor control and causes fewer long-term side effects than older radiation techniques. Patients have reported fewer serious complications, making it a safer option for treating soft tissue sarcomas in the arms, legs, and trunk.

Both preoperative and postoperative IMRT have been tested in people, and the results are promising in terms of safety. While any treatment can have side effects, these studies suggest that both approaches are generally safe for patients.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for soft tissue sarcoma because it offers a more precise delivery of radiation compared to traditional methods. IMRT allows doctors to target tumors with high doses of radiation while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. This precision could lead to fewer side effects and potentially better outcomes for patients. Additionally, the trial is exploring both preoperative and postoperative applications of IMRT, which could help determine the most effective timing for treatment, offering new insights into how to best manage soft tissue sarcoma.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for soft tissue sarcoma?

This trial will compare the effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for treating soft tissue sarcoma. Research has shown that both approaches are effective. Participants in Arm A will receive preoperative IMRT, which studies indicate can reduce the radiation dose to the skin and nearby tissues, resulting in fewer side effects. Patients using this approach have experienced good control of the cancer in the treated area with satisfactory long-term outcomes. Participants in Arm B will receive postoperative IMRT, where evidence shows excellent control of the cancer and low rates of late side effects, especially for tumors in the arms, legs, and body. Both methods have improved control of the cancer in the treated area, making them promising options for managing soft tissue sarcomas.16789

Who Is on the Research Team?

Peter Chung | UHN Research

Peter Chung, MD

Principal Investigator

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

PF

Peter Ferguson, MD

Principal Investigator

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults over 18 with soft tissue sarcoma in the limbs or torso, who are fit enough for surgery and radiotherapy. They must have a tumor that's either new or has come back after treatment. Patients should be able to consent to treatment and follow-up, and have an ECOG score between 0-3.

Inclusion Criteria

I can understand and agree to the study's procedures and risks.
I am available for all treatments and follow-up appointments.
My cancer is either new or has locally returned, and experts agree IMRT is suitable for me.
See 3 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Preoperative Radiation Therapy

Participants receive preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy followed by surgery

5 weeks
Once per week

Postoperative Radiation Therapy

Participants undergo surgery followed by postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy

4 weeks
Once per week

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

5 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy
  • Preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy
Trial Overview The study compares two approaches using IMRT: one where patients get radiation before surgery (preoperative) and another where they get it after (postoperative). The goal is to see which method leads to fewer wound healing complications shortly after surgery.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Preoperative Radiation Therapy (Arm A)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Postoperative Radiation Therapy (Arm B)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

Lead Sponsor

Trials
210
Recruited
70,700+

Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada

Collaborator

Trials
121
Recruited
40,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study of 16 patients with lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma, both sliding-window IMRT (SW-IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) provided excellent coverage of the target areas after surgery, but VMAT was more effective in reducing radiation exposure to critical organs-at-risk.
SW-IMRT was better at sparing the normal tissue corridor, which is important for minimizing the risk of lymphedema, highlighting the strengths of both techniques in postoperative radiotherapy planning.
Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-arc therapy versus sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy in postoperative treatment for primary soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.Ortiz González, I., Morera Cano, D., Roncero Sánchez, R., et al.[2020]
In a study of 59 patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) resulted in late toxicities in 75% of patients, with the majority being mild to moderate (G1-2), including functional limitations and chronic pain.
A larger volume of healthy soft tissue surrounding the treatment area (greater than 3500 cm³) was associated with reduced late toxicities, suggesting that careful planning of radiotherapy can help minimize side effects for patients.
Prospective evaluation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy toxicity in extremity soft tissue sarcomas patients: A role for irradiated healthy soft tissue volume?Bourdais, R., Achkar, S., Honoré, C., et al.[2022]
In a study of 274 patients with nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma, those treated with postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) showed significantly better survival outcomes compared to those receiving two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT), including higher rates of local recurrence-free survival (91.1% vs 80.8%) and overall survival (90.2% vs 81.0%).
Patients receiving IMRT also experienced fewer late toxicities, such as lower rates of joint stiffness (3.9% vs 12.3%) and no cases of severe fractures, suggesting that IMRT is not only more effective but also safer than traditional 2D-RT for this patient population.
Comparison of outcome and toxicity of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy with two-dimensional radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of extremities and trunk.Wang, J., Song, Y., Liu, X., et al.[2021]

Citations

Postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy ...Postoperative IMRT provides excellent LC and low late morbidity rates in patients with STSs in the extremities and trunk wall. These findings clearly indicate ...
The IMRiS Trial: A Phase 2 Study of Intensity Modulated ...In conclusion, we have demonstrated that IMRT for limb sarcomas results in a low rate of grade ≥2 soft tissue fibrosis (subcutaneous tissue) at ...
Real-world clinical outcomes with daily image-guided ...We report the clinical outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) arising in extremities treated with image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy ( ...
Outcome of patients with soft tissue sarcomas ...Conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality in the preoperative or postoperative management of STS.
Impact of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy on Local ...The margins were positive/within 1 mm in 21. Tumor size was more than 10 cm in 68% of patients and grade was high in 83%. Preoperative IMRT was given to 7 ...
6.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30740916/
Comparison of outcome and toxicity of postoperative ...When compared with conventional techniques, postoperative IMRT seems to provide better LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS and less late toxicities in patients with STS ...
Postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes after ...Preoperative versus postoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective comparative evaluation of disease outcome. Int ...
Novel Postoperative Hypofractionated Accelerated ...This study evaluates the acute toxicity of a hypofractionated accelerated RT dose-painting (HARD) approach for postoperative treatment of STS.
Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in ...This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security