100 Participants Needed

Transdermal Compress Device for Prosthesis Users

Recruiting at 9 trial locations
KG
Overseen ByKristen Gault
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial
Approved in 2 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Transdermal Compress device in participants with Transfemoral Amputations.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are on corticosteroids, immunosuppressive, or chemotherapy drugs, you may not be eligible to participate.

Is the Transdermal Compress Device generally safe for humans?

The safety evaluation of non-active implantable medical devices, like the Transdermal Compress Device, faces challenges similar to those of medicines, but lacks a global program for collecting and analyzing adverse events. Efforts are being made to improve safety monitoring through initiatives like the unique device identifier (UDI) to better track long-term patient outcomes.12345

How is the Transdermal Compress Device treatment different from other treatments for prosthesis users?

The Transdermal Compress Device is unique because it eliminates the need for a socket by rigidly attaching the prosthetic limb directly to the bone, promoting bone growth into the device for permanent integration. This approach can improve function and satisfaction for users who struggle with conventional socket-based prostheses.678910

Research Team

DR

David Recker, M.D.

Principal Investigator

Balmoral

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for men and women aged 18-65 with a BMI between 18.5 and ≤ 40 kg/m2, who have had one or both legs amputated above the knee without bone or vascular disease. They must struggle with conventional prostheses, have enough healthy bone for device support, not have specific bone defects, and commit to the study's full duration including rehabilitation.

Inclusion Criteria

My bones are strong enough to support an implant.
You don’t have any bone defects where the anchor plug is supposed to go.
I am between 18 and 65 years old and my bones have fully grown.
See 5 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Surgical Implantation

Participants undergo surgical implantation of the Transdermal Compress device on Study Day 1

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Rehabilitation and Monitoring

Participant progression including clinical assessments and prosthetic use will follow the study rehabilitation protocol. Participants will be assessed for effectiveness and safety endpoints at baseline and at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24 and annually through 5 years post-implantation.

5 years
Multiple visits (in-person) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24, and annually

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including long-term follow-up in the Osseointegration Quality Registry

Long-term

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Transdermal Compress Device
Trial OverviewThe Transdermal Compress Device is being tested in this study to see if it's safe and effective for people with transfemoral (above-knee) amputations. The device aims to improve prosthesis use when traditional socket prostheses are problematic.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Transdermal Compress DeviceExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
The Transdermal Compress device is a bone-anchored transdermal implant that addresses the shortcomings of a socket prosthesis and provides options to amputees who are not able to utilize a conventional socket prosthesis.

Transdermal Compress Device is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Compress Device for:
  • Transfemoral amputations due to trauma or cancer
  • Rehabilitation problems with conventional socket prostheses
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Compress Device for:
  • Transfemoral amputations
  • Rehabilitation problems with conventional socket prostheses

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Balmoral Medical company

Lead Sponsor

Trials
4
Recruited
2,900+

Boston Biomedical Associates

Lead Sponsor

Trials
9
Recruited
340+

Findings from Research

There is a significant gap in the safety evaluation of non-active implantable medical devices (NAIMDs) compared to medicines, particularly in the absence of a global program for collecting and analyzing adverse events and product quality issues.
Adopting methodologies from drug safety evaluations, such as utilizing real-world data sources like electronic health records and implementing unique device identifiers (UDI), could enhance the ongoing monitoring and assessment of NAIMD safety throughout their entire life cycle.
Evaluating the Safety Profile of Non-Active Implantable Medical Devices Compared with Medicines.Pane, J., Coloma, PM., Verhamme, KM., et al.[2018]
A review of FDA databases revealed 120 unique adverse event reports related to Clinical Information Systems (CIS) from over 1.4 million total reports, highlighting issues like missing data and system downtime.
The findings suggest that while the number of reported adverse events is relatively low, there is a need for increased awareness and communication among manufacturers and users to improve the safety and effectiveness of CIS.
Review of Reported Clinical Information System Adverse Events in US Food and Drug Administration Databases.Myers, RB., Jones, SL., Sittig, DF.[2022]
A study analyzing adverse event reports for cochlear implants found that most incidents involved patient injury (16,736 cases) and device malfunction (10,760 cases), highlighting areas for potential safety improvements.
Using machine learning algorithms, researchers achieved high prediction accuracy (up to 88.6%) in identifying the cochlear implant manufacturer and type of adverse event based on the descriptions, suggesting that data analysis can enhance understanding of device performance and safety.
Machine learning for pattern detection in cochlear implant FDA adverse event reports.Crowson, MG., Hamour, A., Lin, V., et al.[2021]

References

Evaluating the Safety Profile of Non-Active Implantable Medical Devices Compared with Medicines. [2018]
Review of Reported Clinical Information System Adverse Events in US Food and Drug Administration Databases. [2022]
Machine learning for pattern detection in cochlear implant FDA adverse event reports. [2021]
What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review. [2023]
A far-reaching Regulation for the Italian National Registry of Implantable Prostheses: a possible model for other health registries. [2021]
The Compress® transcutaneous implant for rehabilitation following limb amputation. [2022]
Surgical technique: Methods for removing a Compress® compliant prestress implant. [2022]
Compressive osseointegration promotes viable bone at the endoprosthetic interface: retrieval study of Compress implants. [2022]
A finite element analysis of load distribution during donning and orthostatic posture in the ITOP hybrid subischial socket. [2023]
A motor-driven adjustable prosthetic socket operated using a mobile phone app: A technical note. [2019]