BMAC vs Triamcinolone for Hip Osteoarthritis

LP
JK
ZH
Overseen ByZoe Healy, MS
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial examines two treatments for hip osteoarthritis: bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and Triamcinolone. The goal is to determine which treatment more effectively reduces pain and improves walking ability over time. Participants will receive either a BMAC or Triamcinolone injection, and researchers will compare their pain levels and walking distances over a year. The trial seeks individuals with hip osteoarthritis who have undergone physical therapy in the last six months and are willing to stop using pain medications two weeks before the trial begins. As a Phase 3 trial, this study represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants a chance to contribute to potentially groundbreaking treatments.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

Yes, you will need to stop taking pain and anti-inflammatory medications two weeks before the trial starts.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) is generally safe for individuals with osteoarthritis. One study found that BMAC improved patients' perceptions of their knee osteoarthritis over a year, suggesting it might also be safe and beneficial for hip osteoarthritis. Before using BMAC, researchers ensure it is clean and verify the cell count.

Triamcinolone, a steroid used to reduce swelling, has been widely used for many conditions, providing extensive knowledge about its safety. It is usually well-tolerated, though some individuals might experience short-term side effects like elevated blood sugar or mood changes.

Both treatments have demonstrated potential benefits and are being carefully studied to ensure safety for individuals with hip osteoarthritis.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Unlike the standard treatments for hip osteoarthritis, which often include pain medications and physical therapy, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) offers a unique approach. BMAC is derived from a patient's own bone marrow and concentrated to enhance its regenerative properties, potentially promoting more natural healing of joint tissues. Researchers are excited about BMAC because it targets the underlying causes of joint degeneration rather than just alleviating symptoms. By using the body's own cells, it may offer a more sustainable solution to pain and mobility issues associated with hip osteoarthritis.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for hip osteoarthritis?

This trial will compare the effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and Triamcinolone for hip osteoarthritis. Research has shown that BMAC can help people with osteoarthritis by reducing pain and improving movement, with benefits lasting at least a year. It may work by containing cells that help heal tissues and reduce swelling. Triamcinolone, another treatment option in this trial, is a type of steroid known to quickly reduce pain, though its effects might not last as long as those of BMAC. Both treatments effectively relieve pain, but BMAC might offer longer-lasting results.12678

Who Is on the Research Team?

CH

Carlos Higuera-Rueda, MD

Principal Investigator

Cleveland Clinic Florida

LP

Leonardo Oliveira, MD

Principal Investigator

Cleveland Clinic Florida

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for men and women aged 18-65 with hip osteoarthritis, who have had physical therapy but no recent corticosteroid injections or active autoimmune diseases. Participants must not be pregnant, planning pregnancy, or have a history of certain medical conditions like uncontrolled diabetes or thyroid dysfunction.

Inclusion Criteria

WOMAC Pain Subscale With Average Score(Total WOMAC Pain Score Divided by 5) Equal to 4 or higher
Kellgren-Lawrence Grade > 2 on Hip X-Rays
Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
See 9 more

Exclusion Criteria

Inability to complete forms electronically
Active autoimmune disease
History of hip replacement(s)
See 20 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either a bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injection or a triamcinolone injection under ultrasound guidance

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Initial Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness at 6 weeks post-procedure

6 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Extended Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in pain and functional scores at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-procedure

12 months
3 visits (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Emcyte PureBMC
  • Triamcinolone
Trial Overview The study compares the effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) versus Triamcinolone in reducing pain and improving function in hip osteoarthritis patients. It measures outcomes through patient-reported scores and performance on a walking test over 12 months.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Bone marrow aspirate concentrateExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: TriamcinoloneActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

The Cleveland Clinic

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,072
Recruited
1,377,000+

Lisa Dean Moseley Foundation

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
100+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study involving 30 patients with hip osteoarthritis, the extended-release formulation of triamcinolone acetonide (TA-ER) was found to have a comparable safety profile to the conventional crystalline suspension (TAcs), with fewer treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported (26.7% for TA-ER vs. 46.7% for TAcs).
TA-ER resulted in significantly lower peak plasma concentrations and overall systemic exposure compared to TAcs, suggesting a potentially safer profile with gradual elimination from the body, which may reduce the risk of systemic side effects.
A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose Study to Assess Safety and Systemic Exposure of Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis.Kivitz, A., Mehra, P., Hanson, P., et al.[2022]
In a phase 2 study involving 25 patients with shoulder osteoarthritis, triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) demonstrated a lower systemic exposure compared to the crystalline suspension (TAcs), suggesting a potentially improved safety profile for TA-ER.
Both formulations were well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported, indicating that TA-ER may provide effective treatment with reduced risk of systemic side effects.
Safety and Systemic Exposure of Triamcinolone Acetonide Following Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Injection of Triamcinolone Extended-Release or Standard Triamcinolone Acetonide in Patients with Shoulder Osteoarthritis: An Open-Label, Randomized Study.Hanson, P., Kivitz, A., Mehra, P., et al.[2023]
In a study of 60 osteoarthritis patients receiving intra-articular injections, triamcinolone hexacetonide combined with lidocaine significantly reduced joint swelling and decreased the need for pain relief medication over 48 weeks.
However, the treatment did not show any impact on the radiographic progression of osteoarthritis in the injected joints, indicating that while it helps with symptoms, it does not alter the underlying disease progression.
Intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide injections in hands osteoarthritis ‒ A double-blinded randomized controlled trial with a one year follow-up.Paschoal, NOS., Natour, J., Machado, FS., et al.[2022]

Citations

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Is Equivalent to Platelet ...Both PRP and BMC were effective in improving patient-reported outcomes in patients with mild to moderate knee OA for at least 12 months.
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Versus Triamcinolone ...This is a single site, randomized single blinded, two arm study researching the effects of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) versus Triamcinolone in ...
A Review of Commercially Available Point-of-Care Devices ...We compared different point-of-care devices that concentrate BM (BMC) by focusing on technical features and quality parameters to help surgeons make informed ...
BMAC vs Triamcinolone for Hip OsteoarthritisTrial Overview The study compares the effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) versus Triamcinolone in reducing pain and improving function in ...
A Greater Platelet Dose May Yield Better Clinical ...Bone marrow aspirate concentrate is equivalent to platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis at 2 years: A prospective randomized trial.
Bone marrow concentrate injections for the treatment of ...Purpose. To investigate the available literature on the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and summarize the current evidence ...
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Use in Hip OsteoarthritisThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of combined Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) action after a single ...
PureBMC SPA cutting-edge bone marrow concentrating system engineered to deliver superior BMC formulations enriched with the highest concentrations of hematopoietic stem ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security