118 Participants Needed

SBRT vs Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Recruiting at 5 trial locations
CT
Overseen ByClinical Trials Referral Office
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial explores two types of radiation therapy to determine which is more effective for treating prostate cancer that has recurred or spread to a few locations. One type, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT), uses precise beams of radiation over a short period. The other, Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy, delivers higher doses over a longer time. The goal is to determine if SBRT can treat the cancer as effectively but with fewer side effects and a shorter treatment duration. The study seeks men with prostate cancer that has returned or spread to up to five sites (oligometastatic). As a Phase 3 trial, it represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants a chance to contribute to potentially groundbreaking treatment advancements.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research shows that both stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) are generally safe and well-tolerated for prostate cancer treatment.

For SBRT, studies have found it to be a safe option for treating recurrent prostate cancer. Patients in these studies experienced side effects that were acceptable and mostly manageable, not causing major issues in daily life.

For HFRT, evidence from several studies with many patients shows similar results. A large analysis found that HFRT's side effects were similar to those from regular radiation therapy, indicating no additional problems compared to standard treatment.

Overall, both treatments have demonstrated safety with manageable side effects. This is encouraging for those considering participation in a clinical trial for recurrent or oligometastatic prostate cancer.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about these treatments for recurrent prostate cancer because they offer potentially more efficient and convenient options compared to traditional radiation therapy. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is unique because it delivers high doses of radiation in just five sessions over 1-2 weeks, which is significantly shorter than conventional therapies that often require several weeks. Hypofractionated radiation therapy also stands out by condensing treatment into 20 sessions over 4-6 weeks, providing a quicker alternative to standard fractionation schedules. Both approaches aim to maintain effectiveness while reducing the treatment burden on patients, which is why they're generating interest in the medical community.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for recurrent prostate cancer?

This trial will compare two treatments for recurrent prostate cancer: stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionated radiation therapy. Research has shown that SBRT can effectively treat prostate cancer, even if it returns or spreads to a few areas, with studies indicating good cancer control and fewer side effects. Meanwhile, hypofractionated radiation therapy has also demonstrated strong results, providing a high survival rate, with 98% of patients surviving cancer-specific issues for five years. Both treatments in this trial aim to destroy cancer cells while causing minimal harm to healthy tissues, offering promising options for managing prostate cancer that recurs or spreads to a few places.35678

Who Is on the Research Team?

CE

Carlos E. Vargas, MD

Principal Investigator

Mayo Clinic

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for men with prostate adenocarcinoma that has either returned after initial treatment or spread to a few other places. Participants should have undergone some prior therapy and be able to undergo imaging tests like PET scans, bone scans, and MRIs.

Inclusion Criteria

My prostate cancer has spread to no more than 5 places.
My prostate cancer was confirmed through a tissue examination.
I can care for myself and am up and about more than 50% of my waking hours.
See 5 more

Exclusion Criteria

Major medical, addictive, or psychiatric illness which in the investigator's opinion, will prevent the consent process, completion of the treatment and/or interfere with follow-up. (Consent by legal authorized representative is not permitted for this study)
I have had radiation therapy to my pelvic area before.
I have had chemotherapy for prostate cancer before.
See 6 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Participants undergo either SBRT over 1-2 weeks or hypofractionated radiation therapy over 4-6 weeks

1-6 weeks
5 visits (SBRT) or 20 visits (hypofractionated)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

5 years
Follow-up at 3 months, 12 months, annually until year 5, then every other year

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy
  • Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Trial Overview The study compares two radiation therapies: SBRT, which delivers precise doses over several days aiming to minimize damage to healthy tissue; versus hypofractionated radiotherapy, which gives higher doses in a shorter time frame potentially killing more tumor cells.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Group II (Hypofractionated radiation therapy)Experimental Treatment6 Interventions
Group II: Group I (SBRT)Experimental Treatment6 Interventions

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Mayo Clinic

Lead Sponsor

Trials
3,427
Recruited
3,221,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study involving 51 prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the treatment showed promising outcomes with manageable toxicity levels, as no patients experienced severe (grade 3+) side effects during the initial follow-up period.
The median follow-up of 14.5 months revealed a low prostate-specific antigen level of 1.3 ng/ml at 13-18 months post-treatment, indicating effective disease control in this cohort.
Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy—first UK experience.Tree, AC., Ostler, P., Hoskin, P., et al.[2022]
The CyberKnife (CK) system provided significantly better dose distribution for prostate cancer treatment compared to both volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), with a higher mean planning target volume dose (39.58 Gy vs. 36.25 Gy).
CK resulted in a lower mean dose to the rectum, indicating improved safety for this organ, while also achieving better conformity and homogeneity indices, although VMAT and IMRT are still considered acceptable alternatives due to their comparable performance.
Does CyberKnife improve dose distribution versus IMRT and VMAT on a linear accelerator in low-risk prostate cancer?Borowicz, DM., Skrobała, A., Kruszyna-Mochalska, M., et al.[2023]
In a study of 12 localized prostate cancer cases, Tomotherapy (HT) demonstrated superior dosimetric results compared to Cyberknife (CK), achieving better dose homogeneity, target coverage, and conformity, which are crucial for effective treatment.
HT also predicted lower late rectal toxicity and resulted in a significantly lower integral dose to the body, suggesting that it may offer clinical benefits by reducing the risk of side effects associated with radiation therapy.
Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of Cyberknife and Tomotherapy in stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.Chen, CY., Lee, LM., Yu, HW., et al.[2018]

Citations

Treatment outcomes with hypofractionated high-dose ...The 5-year overall survival rate was 92%. Only 1 patient died from the disease at 48 months after treatment, giving a 5-year cancer-specific survival of 98%.
Long-Term Outcomes of a Prospective Study on Highly ...In this study, the efficacy and safety of highly hypofractionated IMRT in 15 fractions were evaluated for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. The 5- and ...
Study confirms safety and efficacy of higher-dose-per-day ...While dose-escalated MHFRT was expected to improve outcomes, the data showed no additional benefit in cancer control and a higher risk of ...
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Prostate CancerBoth isodose & dose-escalated MHFRT offer rates of progression-free & overall survival comparable to those seen with conventional ...
Hypofractionated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancerResults: Median follow-up was 54 months (range 11-116 months). The actuarial 8-years Overall Survival was 97.1%. Eight-years Cancer Specific Survival was 100%, ...
evidence from 9074 men in 13 randomized clinical trialsThere was no statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival after five years of treatment between the HFRT and CFRT groups. In ...
Conventional vs. Hypofractionated, Radiotherapy for High- ...At 10 years of follow up there were no significant differences in survival outcomes between HFRT and CFRT for overall mortality (68.2% vs. 66%; RR 1.04 [0.87- ...
Hypofractionated Radiation for High-Risk Prostate Cancer ...At 5 years, rates of overall survival (90.3% vs 89.7%), prostate cancer-specific survival (97.4% vs 97.5%), biochemical recurrence-free ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security