Your session is about to expire
← Back to Search
Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy
subjects (%) with Antibiotic use for Primary Immunodeficiency (ASISinPI Trial)
Phase 1 & 2
Waitlist Available
Led By Li Nguyen, MD
Research Sponsored by ASIS Corporation
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial Must have
Be older than 18 years old
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up 12 months
Awards & highlights
ASISinPI Trial Summary
ASIS Corporation (ASIS) has developed the only automatic injection system for delivery of injectable products to it's optimum/right spot, just outside of the fascia, which exists subdermally (between the skin and muscle). Bloodless basically implies longer lasting medicinal effects, and minimal side effects - advantages that reflect the NIH mission of enhancing health, lengthening life, and reducing the burdens of illness and disability. ASIS device is stabilized on the surface of the skin with negative pressure and emits an electrical current to create a bloodless cavity subdermally. ASIS device correctly, automatically, and consistently delivers therapeutic agents, yet requiring little skill of a practitioner - providing the steady and safe infusion into subdermal bloodless space of virtually any injectable product in addition to Botox, including GAMMAGARD LIQUID, Enbrel, Insulin, and Fillers, etc. According to the FDA, "This innovation will have major impact on the healthcare industry."
Eligible Conditions
- Primary Immunodeficiency
ASISinPI Trial Timeline
Screening ~ 3 weeks3 visits
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~ 12 months
Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~12 months
Treatment Details
Study Objectives
Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.Primary outcome measures
Relative Prolongation Ability Score for Gadolinium subdermally injected
Secondary outcome measures
Efficacy of GAMMAGARD subcutaneously vs. subdermally in Primary Immunodeficiency
Other outcome measures
Adverse Reactions of GAMMAGARD subcutaneously vs. subdermally in Primary Immunodeficiency
ASISinPI Trial Design
20Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: subjects (%) with Days out of workExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
subjects (%) with Days out of work as Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group II: subjects (%) with Antibiotic useExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
subjects (%) with Antibiotic use as Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group III: subjects (%) of any infectionsExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
subjects (%) of any infections as Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group IV: Gadolinium For lower backExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
1cc/ diluted with 19cc normal saline (for <40kg) or 29cc normal saline (for >40kg), subcutaneously for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Gadolinium For lower back Total Persistent % subdermally, For lower back Total Persistent % subcutaneously, and For lower back Relative Prolongation Ability Score.
Group V: Gadolinium For abdomenExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Gadolinium For abdomen Total Persistent % subdermally, For abdomen Total Persistent % subcutaneously, and For abdomen Relative Prolongation Ability Score.
Gadolinium Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine)
1cc/ diluted with 19cc normal saline (for <40kg) or 29cc normal saline (for >40kg), subcutaneously for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Group VI: Annual rate with Days out of workExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Annual rate with Days out of work as Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group VII: Annual rate with Antibiotic useExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Annual rate with Antibiotic use as Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group VIII: Annual rate of any infectionsExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Annual rate of any infections as Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group IX: Annual rate hospitalized infectionsExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Annual rate hospitalized infections as Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group X: Adverse Reactions VomitingExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Vomiting as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XI: Adverse Reactions OropharyngealExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Oropharyngeal as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XII: Adverse Reactions NauseaExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Nausea as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XIII: Adverse Reactions HeadacheExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Headache as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XIV: Adverse Reactions FeverExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Fever as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XV: Adverse Reactions FatigueExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Fatigue as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XVI: Adverse Reactions DiarrheaExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Diarrhea as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XVII: Adverse Reactions AsthmaExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Asthma as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XVIII: Adverse Reactions Abdominal PainExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Abdominal Pain as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XIX: Adverse Injection Local ReactionsExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Adverse Injection Local Reactions as Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Adverse Reactions of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Group XX: (%) with hospitalized infectionsExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
(%) with hospitalized infections as Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subcutaneously at Week 36, vs. Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Gammagard subdermally at Week 36.
Find a Location
Logistics
Participation is compensated
You will be compensated for participating in this trial.
Who is running the clinical trial?
ASIS CorporationLead Sponsor
2 Previous Clinical Trials
120 Total Patients Enrolled
Li Nguyen, MDPrincipal InvestigatorAUTOMATIC SUBDERMAL INJECTOR SYSTEM INC
3 Previous Clinical Trials
180 Total Patients Enrolled
Thanh Phung, MDPrincipal InvestigatorAUTOMATIC SUBDERMAL INJECTOR SYSTEM, INC
1 Previous Clinical Trials
60 Total Patients Enrolled
Frequently Asked Questions
These questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients, and have not been verified by our internal team.
Recent research and studies
Other Trials to Consider
Popular Categories
Share this study with friends
Copy Link
Messenger