Your session is about to expire
← Back to Search
ASA 81mg for Colorectal Cancer
Study Summary
This trial is testing whether a real-world chemoprevention agent (CPA) intervention (3-months of daily low-dose acetylsalicylic (ASA)) is feasible in participants at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC).
- Colorectal Cancer
- Colorectal Adenomas
- Colorectal Polyps
Timeline
Treatment Details
Study Objectives
Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.Trial Design
Find a Location
Who is running the clinical trial?
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this experiment recruiting participants at the moment?
"Clinicaltrials.gov indicates that this research project is not currently enrolling patients, as it was posted on July 1st 2022 and last modified May 27th 2022. Notwithstanding, there are still 1137 different clinical trials actively searching for participants at the present time."
Does this research project accept participants under the age of 30?
"This trial requires patients to be within the age range of 50 and 59. There are 44 trials for those below 18, and 1122 trials for people 65 or above."
What are the primary aims of this clinical experiment?
"This clinical trial will be assessed over a period of seven days, with the principal aim to ensure adherence to ASA for 90 days. Ancillary outcomes include evaluation of self-efficacy (utilizing NIH Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), consideration of beliefs and values concerning chemoprevention medicines (as measured via Beliefs about Medicines questionnaire) and analysis of knowledge related to taking preventative medication (using Chemoprevention Questionnaires)."
What are the eligibility criteria for taking part in this medical experiment?
"To be considered for inclusion in this trial, patients must possess adenomatous polyps and their age should fall between 50-59 years old. The study is aiming to enroll approximately 100 participants."
Has this treatment earned the endorsement of government regulators?
"Although the data supporting efficacy of this treatment is limited, safety has been adequately researched and our team at Power consequently assigns a rating of 2."
Share this study with friends
Copy Link
Messenger