This trial is evaluating whether IV Diazoxide will improve 3 primary outcomes and 4 secondary outcomes in patients with Stunned Myocardium. Measurement will happen over the course of From first dose of cardioplegia through 7 days post operatively or discharge, whichever comes first.
This trial requires 30 total participants across 2 different treatment groups
This trial involves 2 different treatments. IV Diazoxide is the primary treatment being studied. Participants will all receive the same treatment. Some patients will receive a placebo treatment. The treatments being tested are in Phase 1 and are in the first stage of evaluation with people.
Results from a recent paper indicate that stunning could be a predictor of myocardial protection for an ischemia/reperfusion. Nevertheless, the treatment of stunning for the protection of the myocardium is not easy.
Many of the common symptoms of cardiac injury in this large population are not attributable to ischemia and can be traced to the development of hyperkalemia and cardiac arrhythmias.
Stunning was found to have been related to a high postnatal weight. In addition, the postnatal weight was associated with the severity of myocardial dysfunction.
The following signs and symptoms are commonly associated with AMI and might be associated with the underlying mechanism that results in AMI: (1) ST in lead aVL, but less commonly in V4, V5 or V6, (2) low blood pressure, congestive heart failure and elevated troponin; and (3) dyspnea, abnormal heart sounds and pulmonary edema. All of these signs might be associated with STEMI and warrant a STEMI workup.
The treatment for the acute phase of shock is based on age, heart structure, and extent of myocardial injury. Patients in the early recovery phase with uncomplicated coronary artery disease have a good prognosis, and are often treated with lifestyle changes, antiplatelet agents, or beta blockers, as well as anticoagulants if required. Patients older than 65 and women should be advised to receive ACE inhibitors. Patients with depressed levels of fibrinogen (<30g/L) are advised to be treated with fresh frozen plasma.
In this case, we can say that there were no significant differences found either by gender or age groups concerning reliability. At the end of the study, we can say that there was not any significant difference found either by gender or age groups concerning reliability. Moreover, there was no significant difference found between the different academic year students concerning reliability. In summary, this study shows that there was not any significant difference found between the different academic year students concerning reliability. In conclusion, no new information about is available for the diagnosis or treatment of a patient with the new definition of stunning (hypoperfusion) who has not responded to conservative therapies in the presence of cardiac activity and evidence of a viable conduction system.
This drug is useful for treating myocardial ischaemia (ST-segment elevation infarction) with myocardial stunning. It is particularly suitable for patients with coronary artery disease that is unresponsive to statins.
Patients with ST have significant morbidity and decreased survival compared with patients who had acute myocardial infarction and ST. A subset of patients with ST have no ST-related deaths or ischaemic events at 30 days. Patients with ST with a ejection fraction<30% who have ST-related ischaemic events can be considered for inclusion in prospective clinical trials evaluating reperfusion therapy for ST.
A large number of side effects were reported in a variety of studies. These are sorted into common and less common. Side effects can be minimized or eliminated by educating patients about diazoxide and by checking diazepam levels in their blood, looking for signs of diazepam dependence, and by the administration of supplemental diazepam if needed.
Studies in recent years investigating the use of diazepam, which is an anti-epileptic drug known to have a cardiac stimulatory effect, have demonstrated promising results. Data from a recent study have led to a number of clinical trials on the effect of iv diazoxide on myocardial performance and its potential use in the prevention and treatment of myocardial stunning in a variety of settings. Thus it is highly likely that more than one clinical trial investigating the use of iv diazoxide would be published in the near future. The potential advantages of using iv diazoxide to reduce myocardial stunning will require careful discussion concerning the possibility of cardiovascular side effects.
There is no significant benefit of iv diazepam or iv diazoxide over placebo in acute myocardial infarction. Neither drug appears to be effective in nonhypotensive myocardial infarction.