33 Participants Needed

PET/CT vs. Cardiac CT for Coronary Artery Disease

(PET; CT Trial)

AA
TT
Overseen ByTia Thomas, RN, BSN
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Johns Hopkins University
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 2 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to evaluate how well two imaging methods—PET/CT, which uses a radioactive substance to detect disease, and cardiac CT—can identify early signs of clogged heart arteries, a cause of coronary artery disease. The trial tests both methods on the same patients to determine which one more effectively detects the disease early. Patients referred for heart imaging due to symptoms like chest pain or shortness of breath, but without a prior heart disease diagnosis, may be suitable candidates. As an unphased trial, this study offers patients the chance to contribute to the advancement of heart disease detection methods.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What prior data suggests that these imaging techniques are safe for assessing coronary artery disease?

Research has shown that PET/CT scans are manageable for patients when checking for heart artery problems. Studies have found that this imaging can accurately detect heart issues without surgery. Evidence suggests that PET/CT scans are dependable and safe for making decisions about heart disease treatment. While specific side effects are not mentioned in the studies, PET/CT is already used in hospitals, indicating it is generally considered safe for patients.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about this trial because PET/CT and Cardiac CT scans offer distinct insights into coronary artery disease that could enhance diagnosis. PET/CT combines metabolic and anatomical data, providing a detailed picture of heart health by highlighting areas of reduced blood flow and potential blockages. This is different from standard tests like stress tests or echocardiograms, which primarily focus on heart function rather than the precise location and severity of blockages. By comparing PET/CT with Cardiac CT, which provides high-resolution images of coronary arteries, researchers hope to determine the most effective method for identifying heart disease early and accurately. This could lead to more personalized treatment plans and better outcomes for patients.

What evidence suggests that PET/CT is effective for detecting coronary artery disease?

Research has shown that PET/CT scans effectively detect coronary artery disease (CAD). Studies demonstrate that PET/CT imaging accurately identifies heart disease in symptomatic individuals. It has a high negative predictive value (NPV), indicating that a negative result strongly suggests the absence of significant heart disease. One study found that PET surpasses SPECT (another imaging test) in identifying various heart artery issues, including those that don't fully obstruct blood flow. PET/CT's accuracy makes it a valuable tool for detecting early signs of heart problems. In this trial, all participants will undergo both PET/CT and Cardiac CT to compare their effectiveness in detecting CAD.16789

Who Is on the Research Team?

AZ

Armin A Zadeh, MD

Principal Investigator

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for men and women over 18 who have stable symptoms suggesting coronary artery disease (CAD) and are referred for a coronary CT angiography. It's not suitable for pregnant individuals, those with severe obesity (BMI >40), a history of heart disease, atrial fibrillation, or any condition that could affect their participation as per the investigator.

Inclusion Criteria

I am referred for a heart scan due to stable heart disease symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria

I have had a heart attack or surgery to improve blood flow to my heart.
Pregnancy
Any other clinically significant medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator could impact the patient's ability to successfully complete the trial
See 2 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Diagnostic Testing

Participants undergo both NaF-PET/CT and conventional cardiac CT to assess coronary atherosclerotic disease

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after diagnostic testing

60 days

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • PET/CT
Trial Overview The study compares two imaging methods to detect coronary atherosclerotic disease: PET/CT versus conventional and ultra-high-resolution cardiac CT. The goal is to determine which method better identifies CAD in patients showing symptoms suggestive of this condition.
How Is the Trial Designed?
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Main groupExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

PET/CT is already approved in European Union, United States for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Y-90 SIRT for:
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Y-90 SIRT for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Johns Hopkins University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2,366
Recruited
15,160,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 can lead to significant tumor response in patients with hepatic malignancies, allowing for subsequent liver resection in selected cases, as demonstrated by a mean lesion volume reduction of 475 cm³ in 12 patients.
While SIRT is generally safe with no complications noted post-treatment, the study found a 67% morbidity rate and 11% mortality rate within 90 days after surgery, highlighting the need for careful patient selection and further research to optimize outcomes.
Liver Resection After Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90: Safety and Outcomes.Mafeld, S., Littler, P., Hayhurst, H., et al.[2020]
A new composite of 99mTc-labeled carbon nanoparticles attached to polymer microspheres can be imaged using standard SPECT, providing a better method for dosimetry in selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for liver tumors.
These radiolabeled microspheres showed high retention in both normal and tumor-implanted rabbit livers, with preferential uptake in tumor sites due to increased blood flow, indicating their potential as effective imaging tools for monitoring treatment distribution.
99mTc-radiolabeled composites enabling in vivo imaging of arterial dispersal and retention of microspheres in the vascular network of rabbit lungs, liver, and liver tumors.Stephens, RW., Tredwell, GD., Knox, KJ., et al.[2022]
Intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) using the beta-emitting source (90)Sr/(90)Y is an effective method for treating coronary artery stenosis, a common cardiac disease associated with restenosis.
Monte Carlo simulations showed that the dosimetry parameters and effective equivalent doses to the heart and surrounding tissues during IVBT were consistent with published experimental data, indicating the safety and reliability of this treatment approach.
Absorbed dose assessment of cardiac and other tissues around the cardiovascular system in brachytherapy with 90Sr/90Y source by Monte Carlo simulation.Saghamanesh, S., Karimian, A., Abdi, M.[2011]

Citations

Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed ...Cardiac hybrid PET/CT imaging allows accurate noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease in a symptomatic population.
Prognostic value of normal positron emission tomography ...All studies included cardiac death as the primary or secondary outcome. The NPV was 93.70–100%; the pooled NPV was 98.80% [95% confidence interval (CI), 97.64– ...
Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR in Coronary Artery DiseaseWhile hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR imaging have shown considerable promise in the evaluation of CAD, their clinical integration remains limited by ...
Comparative effectiveness of positron emission ...Compared with pharmacologic SPECT, PET with MFR can detect nonobstructive CAD including CMD and can more accurately discriminate low-risk from higher-risk ...
Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness ...Although PET MPI has been shown to have higher diagnostic accuracy in detecting hemodynamically significant CAD than SPECT MPI, whether this ...
A highly predictive cardiac positron emission tomography ...The derived PET/CT 90-day and one-year MACE-Revasc risk scores were highly predictive and outperformed ischemic burden and cardiologist assessment.
Assessing the downstream value of first-line cardiac ...Higher imaging quality makes cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) desirable for evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Integrated PET/CT for the Assessment of Coronary Artery ...Conclusion: The data of this preliminary study suggest that PET/CT allows accurate noninvasive clinical decision making about CAD. Because of ...
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Positron Emission ...Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is currently the most accurate noninvasive test for the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security