PET/CT vs. Cardiac CT for Coronary Artery Disease
(PET; CT Trial)
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial aims to evaluate how well two imaging methods—PET/CT, which uses a radioactive substance to detect disease, and cardiac CT—can identify early signs of clogged heart arteries, a cause of coronary artery disease. The trial tests both methods on the same patients to determine which one more effectively detects the disease early. Patients referred for heart imaging due to symptoms like chest pain or shortness of breath, but without a prior heart disease diagnosis, may be suitable candidates. As an unphased trial, this study offers patients the chance to contribute to the advancement of heart disease detection methods.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.
What prior data suggests that these imaging techniques are safe for assessing coronary artery disease?
Research has shown that PET/CT scans are manageable for patients when checking for heart artery problems. Studies have found that this imaging can accurately detect heart issues without surgery. Evidence suggests that PET/CT scans are dependable and safe for making decisions about heart disease treatment. While specific side effects are not mentioned in the studies, PET/CT is already used in hospitals, indicating it is generally considered safe for patients.12345
Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about this trial because PET/CT and Cardiac CT scans offer distinct insights into coronary artery disease that could enhance diagnosis. PET/CT combines metabolic and anatomical data, providing a detailed picture of heart health by highlighting areas of reduced blood flow and potential blockages. This is different from standard tests like stress tests or echocardiograms, which primarily focus on heart function rather than the precise location and severity of blockages. By comparing PET/CT with Cardiac CT, which provides high-resolution images of coronary arteries, researchers hope to determine the most effective method for identifying heart disease early and accurately. This could lead to more personalized treatment plans and better outcomes for patients.
What evidence suggests that PET/CT is effective for detecting coronary artery disease?
Research has shown that PET/CT scans effectively detect coronary artery disease (CAD). Studies demonstrate that PET/CT imaging accurately identifies heart disease in symptomatic individuals. It has a high negative predictive value (NPV), indicating that a negative result strongly suggests the absence of significant heart disease. One study found that PET surpasses SPECT (another imaging test) in identifying various heart artery issues, including those that don't fully obstruct blood flow. PET/CT's accuracy makes it a valuable tool for detecting early signs of heart problems. In this trial, all participants will undergo both PET/CT and Cardiac CT to compare their effectiveness in detecting CAD.16789
Who Is on the Research Team?
Armin A Zadeh, MD
Principal Investigator
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for men and women over 18 who have stable symptoms suggesting coronary artery disease (CAD) and are referred for a coronary CT angiography. It's not suitable for pregnant individuals, those with severe obesity (BMI >40), a history of heart disease, atrial fibrillation, or any condition that could affect their participation as per the investigator.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Diagnostic Testing
Participants undergo both NaF-PET/CT and conventional cardiac CT to assess coronary atherosclerotic disease
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after diagnostic testing
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- PET/CT
Trial Overview
The study compares two imaging methods to detect coronary atherosclerotic disease: PET/CT versus conventional and ultra-high-resolution cardiac CT. The goal is to determine which method better identifies CAD in patients showing symptoms suggestive of this condition.
How Is the Trial Designed?
All patients undergo both, experimental and standard, tests
PET/CT is already approved in European Union, United States for the following indications:
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
- Liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (mCRC)
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)
- Liver metastasis of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)
- Liver metastasis of breast cancer
- Liver metastasis of uveal melanoma
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
- Liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (mCRC)
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)
- Liver metastasis of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)
- Liver metastasis of breast cancer
- Liver metastasis of uveal melanoma
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
Johns Hopkins University
Lead Sponsor
Published Research Related to This Trial
Citations
Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed ...
Cardiac hybrid PET/CT imaging allows accurate noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease in a symptomatic population.
Prognostic value of normal positron emission tomography ...
All studies included cardiac death as the primary or secondary outcome. The NPV was 93.70–100%; the pooled NPV was 98.80% [95% confidence interval (CI), 97.64– ...
Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR in Coronary Artery Disease
While hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR imaging have shown considerable promise in the evaluation of CAD, their clinical integration remains limited by ...
Comparative effectiveness of positron emission ...
Compared with pharmacologic SPECT, PET with MFR can detect nonobstructive CAD including CMD and can more accurately discriminate low-risk from higher-risk ...
Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness ...
Although PET MPI has been shown to have higher diagnostic accuracy in detecting hemodynamically significant CAD than SPECT MPI, whether this ...
A highly predictive cardiac positron emission tomography ...
The derived PET/CT 90-day and one-year MACE-Revasc risk scores were highly predictive and outperformed ischemic burden and cardiologist assessment.
Assessing the downstream value of first-line cardiac ...
Higher imaging quality makes cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) desirable for evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Integrated PET/CT for the Assessment of Coronary Artery ...
Conclusion: The data of this preliminary study suggest that PET/CT allows accurate noninvasive clinical decision making about CAD. Because of ...
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Positron Emission ...
Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is currently the most accurate noninvasive test for the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Related Searches
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.