Partial Rotator Cuff Repair vs. Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Rotator Cuff Tears
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial tests two surgical methods for treating severe rotator cuff tears that cannot be fully repaired. One method involves a partial rotator cuff repair, while the other includes a procedure called superior capsular reconstruction. The goal is to determine which method more effectively reduces pain and improves shoulder function. Individuals with shoulder issues that hinder daily tasks and have been informed that their rotator cuff tear cannot be fully repaired may be suitable candidates for this study. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity to explore innovative treatments for challenging shoulder conditions.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.
What prior data suggests that these surgical modalities are safe for treating rotator cuff tears?
Research shows that both surgical treatments compared in this trial—Partial Rotator Cuff Repair and Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR)—are generally safe. For SCR, studies have shown significant improvements in shoulder function and pain reduction. One study followed 23 patients for up to 51 months and found excellent results in pain relief and shoulder movement. Several studies have also reported improvements in shoulder mobility. Overall, SCR appears to be well-tolerated.
Partial Rotator Cuff Repair, a more traditional method, is commonly performed and considered safe. It has been used for many years to address shoulder problems. Although detailed information on side effects is less frequently discussed, its long-standing use suggests general safety.
While no treatment is without risk, current evidence indicates that both procedures are well-tolerated.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about these treatments for rotator cuff tears because they offer alternatives to traditional methods like complete rotator cuff repair or non-surgical options. Partial Rotator Cuff Repair focuses on repairing only the damaged portion of the tendon, which could potentially lead to faster recovery times and less post-operative stiffness compared to more extensive repairs. Meanwhile, Superior Capsular Reconstruction is a technique that uses a graft to stabilize the shoulder and restore function, which might offer a solution for patients with irreparable tears who have limited treatment options. Both approaches aim to improve shoulder function and reduce pain while minimizing the invasiveness of the procedure.
What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for rotator cuff tears?
This trial will compare Partial Rotator Cuff Repair with Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR) for treating rotator cuff tears. Research has shown that SCR effectively treats severe rotator cuff tears that cannot be repaired. Studies have found that SCR not only reduces pain but also improves shoulder function and range of motion. Specifically, one study found that patients who underwent SCR recovered better shoulder movement and function compared to those who only had partial repairs. Additionally, SCR has maintained positive results over the long term. These findings suggest that SCR could be a promising option for those with serious rotator cuff problems.35678
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for adults over 18 with irreparable rotator cuff tears, as seen on MRI. It's not for those with severe joint issues (Hamada grade ≥3), arthritis visible on X-rays, shoulder infections, neurological problems affecting the shoulder, workers' compensation claims, smokers, or if a complete repair is possible during surgery. Pregnant women and individuals who are illiterate or don't speak English are also excluded.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Pre-operative Assessment
Patient demographics collected and pain/functional status assessed using VAS, SST, ASES, and PROMIS-29 scores
Surgery and Immediate Post-operative Care
Patients undergo either partial rotator cuff repair alone or with SCR; intraoperative data collected
Post-operative Follow-up
Patients follow-up in clinic at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively; questionnaires administered and complications assessed
Follow-up MRI Assessment
MRI performed at 12-month follow-up to assess repair integrity
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Partial Rotator Cuff Repair
- Superior Capsular Reconstruction
Trial Overview
The study compares two surgical treatments for serious rotator cuff injuries: partial rotator cuff repair alone versus the same repair with superior capsule reconstruction (SCR). Pain and function will be measured at multiple times post-surgery to see which method works better. The trial will also use MRI to check how often each treatment fails after one year.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Active Control
Placebo Group
Partial Rotator Cuff Repair is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada for the following indications:
- Irreparable rotator cuff tears
- Shoulder instability
- Rotator cuff dysfunction
- Massive rotator cuff tears
- Shoulder pain
- Limited shoulder mobility
- Rotator cuff injuries
- Shoulder joint instability
- Chronic shoulder pain
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
Robert J. Gillespie
Lead Sponsor
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead Sponsor
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
Collaborator
Lake Health
Collaborator
Published Research Related to This Trial
Citations
Long-term Clinical and Structural Outcomes of Arthroscopic ...
Arthroscopic SCR using fascia lata autograft is an effective surgical option for irreparable rotator cuff tears and retains positive outcomes for at least 10 ...
Comparison of clinical outcomes of superior capsular ...
Although both procedures effectively reduced pain and improved functional scores, SCR demonstrated superior recovery of active ROM and overall shoulder function ...
Combined cuff repair and superior capsular reconstruction ...
This study shows the short-term results on a combination technique to treat rotator cuff tears which are irreparable, have a high risk of retear ...
Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Rotator Cuff ...
Long-term outcome data are essential to determine the role of superior capsular reconstruction for young patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.
Early clinical and patient-reported outcomes for ...
This study confirmed that SCR improves pain and ROM in the short term. Mini-open SCR appears to provide similar improvements in pain and ROM compared with ...
The Number of Surgeons Using Superior Capsular ...
A total of 4% of surgeons who reported using the SCR technique used SCR in greater than 90% of their irreparable RCR cases, as compared with 38% ...
Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive ...
ASCR contributes to significant improvements in patient-reported clinical outcomes and ROM at follow-up after a mean of more than two years.
Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR) Technique
In the SCR study, a 24- to 51-month follow-up on 23 patients shows outstanding outcomes in pain, ASES scores, and acromiohumeral distance measurements.1 The SCR ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.