139 Participants Needed

Combination Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Recruiting at 4 trial locations
JG
Overseen ByJessica Gartrell, MD
Age: < 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 1 & 2
Sponsor: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

The trial aims to identify the best treatment approach for individuals with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS), focusing on both intermediate- and high-risk patients. It tests a combination of drugs—doxorubicin, ifosfamide, pazopanib, and selinexor—to evaluate their effectiveness and potential side effects. Individuals diagnosed with NRSTS, particularly those with tumors difficult to remove surgically, might be suitable candidates for this trial. The goal is to improve survival rates and understand drug interactions within the body. As a Phase 1/Phase 2 trial, this research seeks to understand how the treatment works in people and measure its effectiveness in an initial, smaller group, offering participants a chance to contribute to groundbreaking cancer treatment advancements.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial requires that you stop taking certain medications before enrolling. Specifically, you cannot take medications that are metabolized by CYP3A4 with narrow therapeutic indices, potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, or potent CYP3A4 inducers within 7 to 14 days before starting the study. If you are on thyroid replacement therapy, you must have been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that doxorubicin is usually well-tolerated, though some patients might experience serious side effects. In a study with 504 patients, doxorubicin proved safe for the heart, but heart-related side effects can still occur and require monitoring. Ifosfamide, another drug in the trial, is effective but can increase the risk of side effects, so doctors closely monitor patients for any reactions. The FDA has approved pazopanib for certain advanced soft tissue sarcomas. It is considered safe but may require dose adjustments due to side effects. Lastly, selinexor is still under study, and trials like this one are determining its safe dose. Overall, these treatments have safety data supporting their use, but patients should be aware of possible side effects and discuss them with their doctor.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about these treatments for soft tissue sarcoma because they combine several drugs, each with unique mechanisms that target the cancer in different ways. Doxorubicin and ifosfamide are well-known chemotherapy agents that attack rapidly dividing cancer cells, but pazopanib and selinexor bring something new to the table. Pazopanib is a targeted therapy that inhibits tumor blood vessel growth, cutting off nutrients to the tumor, while selinexor works by blocking a protein that helps cancer cells survive. This multifaceted approach could potentially enhance treatment effectiveness and improve outcomes compared to traditional chemotherapy alone.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma?

Studies have shown that doxorubicin, one of the treatments in this trial, is commonly used to treat soft tissue sarcoma, with a response rate of about 14% to 20%. Although this rate is not very high, doxorubicin often works better when combined with other treatments. Ifosfamide, another treatment option in this trial, controls the disease in about 50% of similar cases when added. Pazopanib, also part of this trial, has demonstrated a 31.4% disease control rate in some studies. Research indicates that adding selinexor, another treatment under study, can help kill cancer cells and slow tumor growth. Each of these drugs works differently, aiming to attack the cancer from multiple angles.678910

Who Is on the Research Team?

Jessica Gartrell, MD - St. Jude ...

Jessica Gartrell

Principal Investigator

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for individuals with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS), including conditions like lipoma and liposarcoma. It aims to help those at intermediate or high risk of the disease progressing, by testing new combinations of drugs and therapies after initial diagnosis.

Inclusion Criteria

I can do most activities, but I might need help, or I use a wheelchair but can still do many things.
My sarcoma has a specific genetic change and is considered high-risk.
My tumor is considered low-risk based on its size and grade.
See 6 more

Exclusion Criteria

I do not have cancer that started in or has spread to my brain.
I do not have conditions that affect drug metabolism, serious wounds, or uncontrolled illnesses, and I am not on HIV treatment.
My cancer type does not match the excluded list.
See 2 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Induction Chemotherapy

Participants receive 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy, with a possible 4th cycle before surgery if deemed beneficial

9-12 weeks

Surgery

Surgical removal of the tumor, with subsequent treatment decisions based on surgical outcomes

1 week

Consolidation Therapy

Participants receive additional chemotherapy and possibly radiation therapy based on surgical outcomes

5-6 weeks

Maintenance Therapy

Participants receive maintenance therapy with pazopanib for 6 months

24 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

3 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Doxorubicin
  • Ifosfamide
  • Pazopanib
  • Proton Beam Radiation Therapy
  • Selinexor
Trial Overview The trial tests a regimen involving ifosfamide, doxorubicin, pazopanib, surgery, radiation therapy (including proton beam), and selinexor. For intermediate-risk patients, it focuses on survival rates using these treatments plus maintenance pazopanib. High-risk patients will have the dosage of selinexor optimized in combination with other drugs.
How Is the Trial Designed?
6Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Low-Risk Subset BExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Group II: Low-Risk Subset AExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Group III: Intermediate-Risk Subset C (participants with high-grade tumors > 10 cm):Experimental Treatment5 Interventions
Group IV: Intermediate-Risk Subset B (participants with high-grade tumors between 5 and 10 cm in sizeExperimental Treatment5 Interventions
Group V: Intermediate-Risk Subset A (participants with low grade tumors):Experimental Treatment5 Interventions
Group VI: High-Risk - 2 groupsExperimental Treatment6 Interventions

Doxorubicin is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada, Japan for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Adriamycin for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Doxorubicin for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Doxorubicin for:
🇯🇵
Approved in Japan as Doxorubicin for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Lead Sponsor

Trials
451
Recruited
5,326,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a phase II study involving 16 patients with recurrent or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) showed no significant responses, indicating limited efficacy in this specific patient population.
Despite the lack of effectiveness, Doxil was well tolerated, with no grade 4 toxicities and only a few instances of grade 3 toxicities, suggesting a favorable safety profile for future studies in different patient groups.
A phase II study of Doxil (liposomal doxorubicin): lack of activity in poor prognosis soft tissue sarcomas.Garcia, AA., Kempf, RA., Rogers, M., et al.[2022]
In a phase 1b study involving 25 patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, the combination of selinexor and doxorubicin demonstrated a tolerable safety profile, with common severe side effects including neutropenia and febrile neutropenia.
The treatment resulted in a partial response in 21% of patients and stable disease in 63%, with a median progression-free survival of 5.5 months and overall survival of 10.5 months, indicating potential efficacy in this patient population.
A phase 1b trial of selinexor, a first-in-class selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS).Lewin, J., Malone, E., Al-Ezzi, E., et al.[2021]
TRAIL, a protein that induces cell death, was found to be effective in killing rhabdomyosarcoma cells, especially when combined with doxorubicin (DOX), which enhanced its cytotoxic effects across different cell lines, including those resistant to TRAIL.
In resistant cell lines, DOX was able to overcome TRAIL resistance, suggesting that combining TRAIL with DOX could be a promising strategy for treating soft tissue sarcomas that do not respond to standard therapies.
Doxorubicin potentiates TRAIL cytotoxicity and apoptosis and can overcome TRAIL-resistance in rhabdomyosarcoma cells.Komdeur, R., Meijer, C., Van Zweeden, M., et al.[2019]

Citations

Outcome for Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ...The median TTF was 4.7 months, and the median OS was 20.1 months. The overall response rate was 20%. Doses of doxorubicin monotherapy did not show significant ...
Quality of life of patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated ...Patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma reported a relatively rapid decline in PROs during doxorubicin-based treatment.
Correlation of doxorubicin dose and survival in patients ...However, median survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced soft tissue sarcoma is approximately 14-19 months with two-year survival rates of 20-30%.
Chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma - Ratan - 2016 - CancerIn a recent frontline study, the response rate to single-agent doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma was approximately 14%.5 The lower rate likely ...
Liposomal vs conventional doxorubicin as first-line therapy ...No significant differences were observed in sex, ECOG PS, metastatic pattern (none vs lung-only vs. other), or overall comorbidity burden.
Reporting Matters: Severe Adverse Events in Soft Tissue ...Our findings show that serious but manageable side effects are common, and they highlight the urgent need for future sarcoma trials to report ...
High cumulative doxorubicin dose for advanced soft tissue ...The recommended cumulative doxorubicin dose in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment was based on cardiotoxicity data from retrospective studies of breast cancer ...
A pilot study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy ...Conclusions: The combination of pembrolizumab with doxorubicin has manageable toxicity and preliminary promising activity in the treatment of ...
Doxorubicin Plus Dual Checkpoint Blockade for Soft Tissue ...Be male or female aged 18-100 years at the time of signing informed consent. Have a histological diagnosis of advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) ( ...
Prospective Evaluation of Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity in ...This analysis evaluated cardiac safety data obtained from 504 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas administered doxorubicin in an international phase III trial.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security