Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials 2023

Browse 97 Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Medical Studies Across 330 Cities

6 Phase 3 Trial · 1076 Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinics

Reviewed by Michael Gill, B. Sc.
10 Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials Near Me
Top Hospitals for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials
Image of Massachusetts General Hospital in Massachusetts.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston
9Active Trials
34All Time Trials for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
2011First Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Trial
Image of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Massachusetts.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston
8Active Trials
33All Time Trials for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
2010First Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Trial
Image of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York
7Active Trials
38All Time Trials for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
2011First Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Trial
Image of M D Anderson Cancer Center in Texas.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston
6Active Trials
14All Time Trials for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
2012First Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Trial
Image of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Massachusetts.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston
6Active Trials
18All Time Trials for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
2010First Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Trial
Top Cities for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials
Image of Boston in Massachusetts.
Boston
44Active Trials
Massachusetts General HospitalTop Active Site
Image of Houston in Texas.
Houston
40Active Trials
M D Anderson Cancer CenterTop Active Site
Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials by Phase of Trial
N/A Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials
1Active Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials
1Number of Unique Treatments
0Number of Active Locations
Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials by Age GroupMost Recent Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical TrialsTop Treatments for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials
Treatment Name
Active Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials
All Time Trials for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
First Recorded Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Trial
Pembrolizumab
17
82
2015
Atezolizumab
4
27
2015
Enzalutamide
2
5
2013
NUV-868
1
1
2022
SGN-B7H4V
1
1
2022
Recently Completed Studies with FDA Approved Treatments for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Treatment
Year
Sponsor
Trilaciclib
2021
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
Zilovertamab vedotin
2020
VelosBio Inc.
Tiragolumab
2020
Hoffmann-La Roche
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) LN-145
2019
Yale University
Cyclophosphamide
2019
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Ipatasertib
2019
Hoffmann-La Roche
Drug 1: LY3023414; Drug 2: Prexasertib
2019
Baylor Research Institute
XmAb®22841
2019
Xencor, Inc.
Part 1 TPST-1120
2019
Tempest Therapeutics
P10s-PADRE with MONTANIDE™ ISA 51 VG + Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide + Paclitaxel
2019
University of Arkansas

What Are Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Trials?

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is a branch of breast cancer that is known for its aggressive nature. As derived from the name of this condition, this breast cancer is largely metastatic, which means that it often spreads to other parts of the body.

The incidence of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is around 15% of all diagnosed breast cancer cases, with many patients experiencing relapse or recurrence after first-line treatment. The resilience of the cancer is largely due to its treatment resistance. Additionally, its metastatic tendencies make the condition more difficult to cure.

Once this breast cancer has metastasized, patients' prognoses worsen. Patients diagnosed with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer also have a higher fatality rate than those who have other forms of cancer. Therefore, it's important to implement clinical trials to find more effective treatment methods.

Why Is Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Being Studied Through Clinical Trials?

Due to ineffective first-line treatments for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, the condition is considered incurable. Patients who undergo standard cancer-related treatments are also more likely to experience recurrence or relapse. Considering the gap in effective medical treatment, it can be deduced that this type of breast cancer requires more efficient and thorough research.

As clinical trials are undertaken to expand the clinical catalog for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, professionals within the medical field are better able to work toward improved treatment methods. Similarly, it allows for better survival rates, and once treatments prove effective, researchers can also study potential curative therapies.

What Are The Types of Treatments Available For Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer?

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is typically treated with generic first-line cancer treatments. These treatments include radiation and chemotherapy. Patients may also be eligible for surgical intervention in cases with no metastasis.

Some patients may be prescribed both chemotherapy and surgery. Chemotherapy may help to shrink localized tumors before excising them. Still, it can also be used as a second-line treatment post-surgery. As a secondary treatment, chemotherapy is used as a preventative measure to reduce the risk of further metastasis and recurrence.

Currently, medical treatments such as immunotherapy and drug-based management are being researched for their efficacy via clinical trials.

What Are Some Recent Breakthrough Clinical Trials For Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer?

Like most cancers, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is continuously being studied through clinical trials. Over time, these trials have tested various treatments and their efficacy, with some producing ground-breaking results that may pave the way for more effective treatments.

2021: Sacituzumab Govitecan VS Chemotherapy – In a clinical trial testing the efficacy of Sacituzumab Govitecan against an industry-standard treatment (chemotherapy). According to the trial results, participants who were given the antibody-drug had better survival rates with lower recurrence instances.

2023: Pembrolizumab Treatment for Metastatic TNBC – In one of the most recent trials, researchers studied participants who were given chemotherapy treatment in conjunction with a drug-based treatment (Pembrolizumab). Results showed that patients who participated in the trial had an increased chance of survival post-treatment.

About The Author

Michael Gill preview

Michael Gill - B. Sc.

First Published: October 24th, 2021

Last Reviewed: August 28th, 2023

References1 Perez-Garcia J, Soberino J, Racca F, Gion M, Stradella A, Cortes J. Atezolizumab in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Sep;20(9):981-989. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1769063. Epub 2020 May 25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/324507252 Sun C, Fang Y, Labrie M, Li X, Mills GB. Systems approach to rational combination therapy: PARP inhibitors. Biochem Soc Trans. 2020 Jun 30;48(3):1101-1108. doi: 10.1042/BST20191092. Review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/323792973 Sun C, Fang Y, Labrie M, Li X, Mills GB. Systems approach to rational combination therapy: PARP inhibitors. Biochem Soc Trans. 2020 Jun 30;48(3):1101-1108. doi: 10.1042/BST20191092. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/323792974 Pérez-García J, Soberino J, Racca F, Gion M, Stradella A, Cortés J. Atezolizumab in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Sep;20(9):981-989. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1769063. Epub 2020 May 25. Review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/324507255 Smith G, Alholm Z, Coleman RL, Monk BJ. DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors-Combination Therapies. Cancer J. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;27(6):501-505. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000561. Review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/349048136 Smith G, Alholm Z, Coleman RL, Monk BJ. DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors-Combination Therapies. Cancer J. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;27(6):501-505. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000561. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/349048137 Jacobs L, Yshii L, Junius S, Geukens N, Liston A, Hollevoet K, Declerck P. Intratumoral DNA-based delivery of checkpoint-inhibiting antibodies and interleukin 12 triggers T cell infiltration and anti-tumor response. Cancer Gene Ther. 2022 Jul;29(7):984-992. doi: 10.1038/s41417-021-00403-8. Epub 2021 Nov 9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/347540768 Esserman LJ, Berry DA, DeMichele A, Carey L, Davis SE, Buxton M, Hudis C, Gray JW, Perou C, Yau C, Livasy C, Krontiras H, Montgomery L, Tripathy D, Lehman C, Liu MC, Olopade OI, Rugo HS, Carpenter JT, Dressler L, Chhieng D, Singh B, Mies C, Rabban J, Chen YY, Giri D, van 't Veer L, Hylton N. Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3242-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.2779. Epub 2012 May 29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/226491529 Traina TA, Miller K, Yardley DA, Eakle J, Schwartzberg LS, O'Shaughnessy J, Gradishar W, Schmid P, Winer E, Kelly C, Nanda R, Gucalp A, Awada A, Garcia-Estevez L, Trudeau ME, Steinberg J, Uppal H, Tudor IC, Peterson A, Cortes J. Enzalutamide for the Treatment of Androgen Receptor-Expressing Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;36(9):884-890. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.3495. Epub 2018 Jan 26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2937307110 Liu JF, Barry WT, Birrer M, Lee JM, Buckanovich RJ, Fleming GF, Rimel B, Buss MK, Nattam S, Hurteau J, Luo W, Quy P, Whalen C, Obermayer L, Lee H, Winer EP, Kohn EC, Ivy SP, Matulonis UA. Combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib alone for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70391-2. Epub 2014 Sep 10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25218906