Structural Heart Disease

Current Location

9 Structural Heart Disease Trials Near You

Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Structural Heart Disease patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

Learn More About Power
No Placebo
Highly Paid
Stay on Current Meds
Pivotal Trials (Near Approval)
Breakthrough Medication

AI-Assisted Heart Monitoring for Heart Disease

Cincinnati, Ohio
Atrial fibrillation is an abnormal beating of the heart that can lead to stroke or heart failure. Structural heart diseases are conditions that affect the heart valves or heart muscle and can cause permanent heart damage if left untreated. Sometimes people have atrial fibrillation or structural heart disease and do not know it. The purpose of this study is to evaluate two devices that can predict who has or may develop atrial fibrillation or structural heart disease based on the results of an electrocardiogram.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:40+

1000 Participants Needed

BASILICA Procedure for Aortic Valve Stenosis

Roanoke, Virginia
This trial is testing a new device called TELLTALE, designed to make heart valve replacement surgery safer. It targets patients over 21 who are at high risk of blocked blood flow to the heart. The device cuts a tissue flap that can cause this blockage, aiming to reduce complications and improve patient outcomes. This type of heart valve replacement has emerged as an effective treatment option in patients with severe aortic stenosis, supported by a series of studies.
Stay on current meds
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:21+

139 Participants Needed

AI-Enabled ECG Screening for Cardiovascular Disease

Chicago, Illinois
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a machine learning/artificial intelligence (AI)-based electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithm (Tempus Next software) can identify undiagnosed cardiovascular disease in patients. It will also examine the safety and effectiveness of using this AI-based tool in a clinical setting. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can the AI-based ECG algorithm improve the detection of atrial fibrillation and structural heart disease? 2. How does the use of this algorithm affect clinical decision-making and patient outcomes? Researchers will compare the outcomes of healthcare providers who receive the AI-based ECG results to those who do not. Participants (healthcare providers) will: Be randomized into two groups: one that receives AI-based ECG results and one that does not. In the intervention group, receive an assessment of their patient's risk of atrial fibrillation or structural heart disease with each ordered ECG. Decide whether to perform further clinical evaluation based on the AI-generated risk assessment as part of routine clinical care.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:40+

1000 Participants Needed

MRI-Guided Catheterization for Heart Disease

Bethesda, Maryland
Background: A heart catheterization is a diagnostic heart procedure used to measure pressures and take pictures of the blood flow through the heart chambers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fluoroscopy shows continuous pictures of the heart chambers that doctors can watch while they work. Researchers want to test this procedure with catheterization tools routinely used in x-ray catheterization called guidewires. Guidewires will help move the heart catheter through the different heart chambers. Guidewires are usually considered unsafe during MRI because MRI can cause a guidewire to heat while inside the blood vessels and heart. Researchers are testing special low energy MRI settings that allow certain guidewires to be used during MRI catheterization without heating. Using these guidewires during MRI may help to decrease the amount of time you are in the MRI scanner, and the overall time the MRI catheterization procedure takes. Objectives: To test if certain MRI settings make it safe to use a guidewire during MRI fluoroscopy. Eligibility: Adults 18 and older whose doctors have recommended right heart catheterization. Design: Researchers will screen participants by reviewing their lab results and questionnaire answers. Participants may give 4 blood samples. Participants will be sedated. They will have a tube (catheter) placed in the groin, arm, or neck if they don t already have one. Patches on the skin will monitor heart rhythm. Special antennas, covered in pads, will be placed against the body. Participants will lie flat on a table that slides in and out of the MRI scanner as it makes pictures. Participants will get earplugs for the loud knocking noise. They can talk on an intercom. They will be inside the scanner for up to 2 hours. They can ask to stop at any time. During a heart catheterization, catheters will be inserted through the tubes already in place. The catheters are guided by MRI fluoroscopy into the chambers of the heart and vessels. The guidewire will help position the catheter.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting

100 Participants Needed

TMVR for Mitral Valve Disease

Hershey, Pennsylvania
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and performance of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) system for the treatment of severe, symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR).
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

75 Participants Needed

Artificial Intelligence Software for Heart Disease

Montreal, Quebec
The DAISEA-ECG project aims to improve the diagnosis of heart diseases in primary care through the DeepECG platform, which combines ECG-AI and ECHONeXT algorithms. This study uses a stepped wedge design, where each Family Medicine Group acts as its own control. The FMGs will gradually transition from the control period (without AI recommendations) to the intervention period (with AI recommendations activated) in a randomized sequence. The primary objective is to compare the sensitivity of family physicians in detecting cardiac pathologies, with and without the assistance of the DeepECG platform. Sensitivity is defined as the proportion of patients correctly referred to cardiology or for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) among those who indeed required cardiovascular evaluation, as confirmed by an independent adjudication committee.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

2000 Participants Needed

AI-Enhanced ECG Interpretation for Structural Heart Disease

Montreal, Quebec
The HEART-AI (Harnessing ECG Artificial Intelligence for Rapid Treatment and Accurate Interpretation) is an open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial, that aims to deploy a platform called DeepECG at point-of-care for AI-analysis of 12-lead ECGs. The platform will be tested among healthcare professionals (medical students, residents, doctors, nurse practitioners) who read 12-lead ECGs. In the intervention group, the platform will display the ECHONeXT structural heart disease (SHD) scores in randomized patients to help doctors prioritize transthoracic echocardiography (TTEs) and reduce the time to diagnosis of structural heart disease. Also, this platform will display the DeepECG-AI interpretation which detects problems such as ischemic conditions, arrhythmias or chamber enlargements and acts an improved alternative to commercially available ECG interpretation systems such as MUSE. Our primary objective is to assess the impact of displaying the ECHONeXT interpretation on 12-lead ECGs on the time to diagnosis of Structural Heart Disease (SHD) among newly referred patients at MHI. We will compare the time interval from the initial ECG to SHD diagnosis by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) between patients in the intervention arm (where ECHONeXT prediction of SHD and TTE priority recommendation are displayed) and patients in the control arm (where ECHONeXT prediction and recommendation are hidden). The main secondary objective is to evaluate the rate of SHD detection on TTE among newly referred patients. We also aim to assess the delay between the time of the first ECG opened in the platform and the TTE evaluation among newly referred patients at high or intermediate risk of SHD. By integrating an AI-analysis platform at the point of care and evaluating its impact on ECG interpretation accuracy and prioritization of incremental tests, the HEART-AI study aims to provide valuable insights into the potential of AI in improving cardiac care and patient outcomes.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased

16160 Participants Needed

SBRT for Ventricular Tachycardia

Halifax, Nova Scotia
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) contributes to over 350,000 sudden deaths each year in the US. Malignant VTs involve an electrical "short circuit" in the heart, formed by narrow channels of surviving tissue inside myocardial scar. Current treatment for VT consists of either implantable defibrillators (ICDs), suppressive drug therapy, catheter ablation or a combination of all 3. Implantable Defibrillators (ICDs) reduce sudden death and can terminate some ventricular tachycardia (VT) without shocks, but they don't prevent VT. The occurrence of ≥1 ICD shock is associated with reductions in mental well-being and physical functioning, and increases in anxiety and sometimes depression. Further, ICD shocks have been consistently associated with adverse outcomes, including heart failure and death. Furthermore, the most important predictor of ICD shocks is a history of prior ICD shocks. Therapies to suppress VT include antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation, neither however is universally effective. When VT recurs despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation, novel yet invasive, approaches may be required. Such invasive procedures carry consequent risks of cardiac and extra-cardiac injury. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive technique that delivers high doses of radiation precisely to specified regions in the body, while minimizing exposure to adjacent tissue. This technique is currently, and commonly used in the treatment of cancer. Conventional application of SBRT has made use of its ability to spare non-target tissue, including for treatment of tumors near the heart. More recently, clinicians have changed the paradigm, by focusing radioablative energy on ventricular scar responsible for ventricular tachycardia. Pre-clinical studies have supported the concept and were followed by first-in-human VT therapeutic experience in 2017. Subsequent studies have had encouraging results for patients who failed or were unable to tolerate conventional treatment.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

12 Participants Needed

Surgical vs. Lifestyle Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
This research study is being performed to begin to determine the effectiveness of two dominant bariatric surgery procedures versus an intensive lifestyle intervention to induce weight loss in patients and promote improvements in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in moderately obese patients. T2DM is currently the 6th leading cause of mortality in the United States and is a major cause of kidney failure, blindness, amputations, heart attack, and other vascular and gastro-intestinal dysfunctions. Traditionally, treatments include intensive lifestyle modifications with or without glucose lowering agents. Neither treatment alone, or in combination, results in complete resolution of diabetes and its potential long-term complications. Bariatric surgery has been proven as an effective treatment to accomplish sustained and significant weight loss for those with severe obesity and has been shown to induce long-term remission of T2DM. However, despite enthusiasm for these potential treatment options, it is not clear whether diabetes is influenced by the type of surgery or by the amount of weight lost or if bariatric surgery is more effective than non-surgical weight loss induced by diet and physical activity in T2DM patients with moderate BMIs (30-40kg/m2; Class I and Class II obesity, or approximately 65-95 pounds overweight depending on your height). More well-controlled studies are needed to more completely inform health care decision making and clinical practice in this area. This research study aims to obtain preliminary information regarding the effectiveness of two major types of bariatric surgery, Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding versus an intensive lifestyle intervention to induce weight loss with diet and increased physical activity.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:25 - 55

69 Participants Needed

Why Other Patients Applied

"I've tried several different SSRIs over the past 23 years with no luck. Some of these new treatments seem interesting... haven't tried anything like them before. I really hope that one could work."

ZS
Depression PatientAge: 51

"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."

AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50

"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."

HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78

"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."

FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31

"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."

WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58

Know someone looking for new options? Spread the word

Learn More About Power

Why We Started Power

We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

Bask
Bask GillCEO at Power
Learn More About Trials
How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do Structural Heart Disease clinical trials pay?

Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

How do Structural Heart Disease clinical trials work?

After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Structural Heart Disease trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Structural Heart Disease is 12 months.

How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

Do I need to be insured to participate in a Structural Heart Disease medical study?

Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

What are the newest Structural Heart Disease clinical trials?

Most recently, we added AI-Enhanced ECG Interpretation for Structural Heart Disease, Artificial Intelligence Software for Heart Disease and AI-Enabled ECG Screening for Cardiovascular Disease to the Power online platform.

Popular Searches

By Condition

Depression Clinical Trials

Anxiety Clinical Trials

Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

ADHD Clinical Trials

Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trials

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

Autism Clinical Trials

Treatment Resistant Depression Clinical Trials

Borderline Personality Disorder Clinical Trials

Social Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials

Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

By Location

Clinical Trials in California

Clinical Trials in Florida

Clinical Trials in Texas

Clinical Trials in New York

Clinical Trials in Ohio

Clinical Trials in Illinois

Clinical Trials in Pennsylvania

Clinical Trials in Michigan

Clinical Trials in North Carolina

Clinical Trials in Massachusetts

Clinical Trials in Missouri

Clinical Trials in Minnesota

Other People Viewed

By Subject

Top Clinical Trials near Elkins Park, PA

Top Rosacea Clinical Trials

Top Friedreich Ataxia Clinical Trials

Top Sarcoidosis Clinical Trials

34 Alzheimer's Disease Trials near Akron, OH

Top Clinical Trials near Orlando, FL

Top Clinical Trials near New York

216 Clinical Trials near Bridgeville, PA

Top Neuroendocrine Tumor Clinical Trials

Top Clinical Trials near Independence, KS

Top Clinical Trials near Charlotte, NC

Top Pulmonary Hypertension Clinical Trials

By Trial

Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer

Electrical Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury

Modified Aortic Endograft for Aortic Aneurysm

Personalized TMS-fNIRS for PTSD

Financial Incentives for First Episode Psychosis

BDC-3042 + Pembrolizumab for Advanced Cancers

Peppermint Oil for Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction in Children

Pre-Surgical Exercise for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Metformin for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

GEN1046 for Cancer

CB-011 for Multiple Myeloma

Standardized Catheterization Assessment for Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security
Match to a Trial