Brachial Plexus Injury

Current Location

9 Brachial Plexus Injury Trials Near You

Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Brachial Plexus Injury patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

Learn More About Power
No Placebo
Highly Paid
Stay on Current Meds
Pivotal Trials (Near Approval)
Breakthrough Medication
This study is evaluating a new therapeutic use of electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing and improve functional recovery following surgical intervention for peripheral nerve injury in arm. Participants will be randomized into one of two groups, treatment or control, with all participants receiving standard of care treatment for the nerve injury. The treatment group will also receive a single dose of the therapeutic stimulation during the surgical intervention for their nerve injury.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

60 Participants Needed

The purpose of this research study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of using two CRS Arrays (microelectrodes) for long-term recording of brain motor cortex activity and microstimulation of brain sensory cortex.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:22 - 70

30 Participants Needed

The brachial plexus is a network of nerves that exit the spinal cord from the C5-T1 nerve roots and provide all motor and sensory function to the arm from the shoulder to the fingers. Injury to the brachial plexus due to traction forces during labor and/or delivery causing the nerves to stretch or tear occurs in 0.9 out of 1000 live births. As many as 30% of infants with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) have paralysis or weakness in one arm resulting in lifelong impairment in arm function with joint contractures, the shortening of tendons, ligaments and muscles, leading to reduced range of motion (ROM), being a common complication and major source of disability. A primary goal of early management of BPBI is to use passive range of motion (PROM) (stretching) to improve and/or maintaining shoulder ROM due to the known risk of shoulder contracture within the first year of life. Infants who develop contractures face challenges in overall sensory-motor development and are less able to participate in meaningful occupations and activities of daily living due to limited upper extremity ROM. They are also at risk for subsequent surgeries throughout their lives. Occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) and physicians who specialize in treating infants with BPBI recommend caregivers to perform PROM at every diaper change, which is every 1-3 hours in the first months of life, and every 4-6 hours by age one. A survey study by one of the investigators on this proposed project found that 85% of OTPs who specialize in BPBI make this recommendation for performing PROM at every diaper change; however, there is no research to support this frequency to prevent or decrease contractures. Clinical observations suggest that infants who receive consistent daily PROM seem to avoid development of shoulder contractures while those who receive no or infrequent PROM seem to develop early and significant contractures. In a retrospective pilot study we found that children whose parents consistently performed PROM two times daily starting before age two months were less likely to develop shoulder contractures than children whose parents were inconsistent in performing PROM. These findings, along with our clinical observations suggest that frequency of PROM might be less important than consistency. In order to assess the efficacy of different levels of frequency (e.g., at every diaper change vs. two times per day), it is imperative to identify methods that support caregivers in performing PROM every day. Therefore, the proposed study will pilot a caregiver training method which, if successful in facilitating daily adherence, will be used as part of a larger planned study that will compare differences in recommended frequencies of stretching. In a survey study and scoping literature review performed by one of the co-investigators on this project, caregiver adherence to home therapy recommendations was found to be facilitated by confidence in the training they received and by their confidence in ability to carry-out recommendations; lack of confidence in performing the home therapy recommendations was found to be a common barrier. Therefore, the objective of the proposed work is to assess the efficacy of a pilot training protocol for caregivers of infants with BPBI. Our central hypothesis is that the pilot training protocol will improve caregiver efficacy and increase their confidence in performing the recommended PROM/stretching procedure, thus facilitating adherence which we hope to later demonstrate will decrease the risk of shoulder contracture in infants with BPBI. The significance of this work is that it will evaluate and provide evidence for the use of the pilot training protocol so that this training protocol can later be used in a larger study on the efficacy of different frequencies of PROM to reduce the development of shoulder contracture in infants with BPBI, and thus contribute to developing evidenced-based standards of care for this population. The objectives of this clinical trial are to: 1. determine whether caregivers who receive a pilot training protocol for performing PROM demonstrate improved efficacy in performing PROM compared to caregivers who receive standard training 2. determine whether caregivers who receive a pilot training protocol for performing PROM demonstrate improved self-confidence in performing PROM compared to caregivers who receive standard training 3. determine whether caregivers who receive a pilot training protocol for performing PROM report better daily adherence to daily PROM compared to caregivers who receive standard training
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

20 Participants Needed

NTX-001 is a single use surgical product intended for use in conjunction with standard suture neurorrhaphy of severed nerves in patients between 18 and 80.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3

98 Participants Needed

The goal of this study is to determine which parts of the brain make it possible for some people to move skillfully with their left non-dominant hand.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

147 Participants Needed

This trial is testing if giving ketamine can help reduce severe nerve pain in patients with brachial plexus injuries. Ketamine works by blocking pain signals to the brain. The study aims to see if this reduces the need for other pain medications. Ketamine has been reported to enhance the pain-relieving effects of local anesthetics and is used primarily for patients who are tolerant to opioids and those with severe acute pain.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Phase 4

100 Participants Needed

Although peripheral nerve is capable of regrowth following injury, at only 1 mm/day, the slow rate represents a major barrier. Apart from rapid deterioration of the environment supportive of growth, denervated muscles become atrophic and bones osteoporotic. To successfully restore function, in addition to speeding up the nerve regeneration rate, treatments that can also restore muscle and bone mass are essential. Recently, in animal studies, the investigators showed that in addition to accelerating the speed of nerve regeneration, exercise training can also be used to restore muscle bulk and bone density. While promising, given the inter-species differences, the clinical utilities of this treatment need to be directly tested in humans. This will be done using a randomized controlled study design on patients with brachial plexus injury.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:18 - 60

40 Participants Needed

This trial tests a new type of brain stimulation device for people with chronic pain that doesn't respond to other treatments. The device sends electrical signals to different parts of the brain and adjusts these signals based on real-time pain levels. The goal is to provide better and longer-lasting pain relief.

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:22 - 80

12 Participants Needed

TMS for Neuropathic Pain

San Francisco, California
Chronic neuropathic pain is defined as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. It is highly prevalent, debilitating, and challenging to treat. Current available treatments have low efficacy, high side effect burden, and are prone to misuse and dependence. Emerging evidence suggests that the transition from acute to chronic neuropathic pain is associated with reorganization of central brain circuits involved in pain processing. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising alternative treatment that uses focused magnetic pulses to non-invasively modulate brain activity, a strategy that can potentially circumvent the adverse effects of available treatments for pain. RTMS is FDA-approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and migraine, and has been shown to reduce pain scores when applied to the contralateral motor cortex (M1). However, available studies of rTMS for chronic neuropathic pain typically show variable and often short-lived benefits, and many aspects of optimal treatment remain unknown, including ideal rTMS stimulation parameters, duration of treatment, and relationship to the underlying pain etiology. Here the investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy of high frequency rTMS to M1, the region with most evidence of benefit in chronic neuropathic pain, and to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify alternative rTMS targets for participants that do not respond to stimulation at M1. The central aim is to evaluate the pain relieving efficacy of multi-session high-frequency M1 TMS for pain. In secondary exploratory analyses, the investigator propose to investigate patient characteristic that are predictive of responsive to M1 rTMS and identify viable alternative stimulation targets in non-responders to M1 rTMS.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

32 Participants Needed

Why Other Patients Applied

"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."

HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78

"As a healthy volunteer, I like to participate in as many trials as I'm able to. It's a good way to help research and earn money."

IZ
Healthy Volunteer PatientAge: 38

"I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."

ID
Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40

"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."

AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50

"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."

FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31

Know someone looking for new options? Spread the word

Learn More About Power

Why We Started Power

We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

Bask
Bask GillCEO at Power
Learn More About Trials

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do Brachial Plexus Injury clinical trials pay?

Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

How do Brachial Plexus Injury clinical trials work?

After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Brachial Plexus Injury trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Brachial Plexus Injury is 12 months.

How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

Do I need to be insured to participate in a Brachial Plexus Injury medical study?

Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

What are the newest Brachial Plexus Injury clinical trials?

Most recently, we added Exercise Training for Brachial Plexus Injury, NTX-001 for Peripheral Nerve Injury and Caregiver Training for Brachial Plexus Injury to the Power online platform.

Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security