Robotic vs Electromagnetic Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary Nodules

(RELIANT 2 Trial)

Not currently recruiting at 2 trial locations
RP
FM
Overseen ByFabien Maldonado, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Vanderbilt University Medical Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial compares two methods of bronchoscopy, a procedure that allows doctors to see inside the lungs, to determine which is more effective at diagnosing lung nodules, or small growths in the lungs. One method uses a robotic system with advanced imaging, while the other employs electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, also with advanced imaging. The trial is for individuals already scheduled for a bronchoscopy to examine a lung nodule. It may be suitable for those advised to undergo this procedure to investigate a spot on the lung. As an unphased trial, it offers a unique opportunity to contribute to medical knowledge and potentially enhance diagnostic methods for future patients.

Do I need to stop my current medications for this trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What prior data suggests that these bronchoscopy techniques are safe for diagnosing pulmonary nodules?

Studies have shown that robotic-assisted bronchoscopy is generally easy for patients to tolerate. Research indicates it improves the accuracy of lung nodule biopsies compared to older methods. Most patients undergo the procedure without major issues, though some might experience minor side effects.

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy is also considered safe. Studies have found it to be a reliable method for diagnosing lung problems. Most patients do not encounter significant issues, but, like any medical procedure, some risks exist. Overall, both treatments are effective and safe options for lung biopsy procedures.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about this trial because it compares two advanced techniques for diagnosing pulmonary nodules: Robotic Assisted Bronchoscopy (RAB) and Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (ENB). RAB stands out by integrating a robotic system with cone beam computed tomography, offering precise navigation and enhanced visualization during the procedure. On the other hand, ENB uses digital tomosynthesis to guide the bronchoscope, providing a less invasive option with improved accuracy in locating nodules. These methods could potentially improve both the effectiveness and safety of diagnosing lung conditions compared to the current standard practices, which often rely on conventional bronchoscopy or CT-guided biopsy.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for diagnosing pulmonary nodules?

This trial will compare Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) with Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) for diagnosing pulmonary nodules. Studies have shown that robotic-assisted bronchoscopy can successfully locate 98% of small lung growths. This method has significantly improved the ability to sample hard-to-reach areas, making it a promising option for diagnosing lung issues. Meanwhile, Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) has a success rate of about 67.8% in diagnosing these growths, with improved accuracy when combined with other imaging techniques. Although some complications have been reported, ENB allows doctors to take samples and assess the stage of lung issues in one procedure. Both technologies effectively diagnose lung conditions, each with unique strengths in locating lung growths.13467

Who Is on the Research Team?

RP

Rafael Paez, MD

Principal Investigator

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for individuals who need a biopsy of lung nodules or lesions. Participants should be suitable candidates for bronchoscopy, a procedure to look inside the lungs' airways.

Inclusion Criteria

I am scheduled for a special lung scan to check a spot.

Exclusion Criteria

I choose not to participate in the trial.

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo either robotic assisted bronchoscopy with integrated cone beam computed tomography or electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy with integrated digital tomosynthesis for biopsy of a pulmonary lesion

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for diagnostic yield and safety post-procedure

1 week
1 visit (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy
  • Robotic assisted bronchoscopy
Trial Overview The RELIANT 2 study is comparing two advanced bronchoscopy techniques: Robotic Assisted Bronchoscopy (RAB) with CT imaging and Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (ENB) with digital imaging, to see which one better identifies lung issues.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Robotic assisted bronchoscopy (RAB)Active Control1 Intervention
Group II: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)Active Control1 Intervention

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
922
Recruited
939,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study of 56 patients with small peripheral pulmonary nodules, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) combined with radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) demonstrated a significantly better negative predictive value compared to ENB combined with x-ray, indicating improved diagnostic accuracy for smaller nodules.
The findings suggest that using R-EBUS alongside ENB can enhance the ability to accurately diagnose small nodules that conventional bronchoscopy cannot reach, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.
Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy combined with x-ray or radial endobronchial ultrasound biopsy in the diagnosis of small peripheral pulmonary nodules.Fu, Y., Yuan, X., Pan, W., et al.[2023]
Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) demonstrated a 61.1% positive diagnosis rate for peripheral lung lesions, with a sensitivity of 73.3%, indicating its effectiveness in diagnosing conditions like lung cancer and tuberculosis.
The diagnostic accuracy of ENB significantly improves for lesions larger than 2 cm, achieving a 100% positive diagnosis rate for these cases, suggesting its potential for broader clinical application in lung diagnostics.
[Clinical Application of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy on the Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Lesions].Xue, M., Wang, J., Han, Y., et al.[2021]
The RELIANT trial is a groundbreaking study comparing robotic assisted bronchoscopy to electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary lesions, involving approximately 400 patients and aiming to assess the diagnostic yield of each method.
This trial is significant as it is the first randomized controlled trial of robotic assisted bronchoscopy, which may offer advantages like an easier learning curve, and it will provide valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of these two bronchoscopic techniques.
Robotic versus Electromagnetic Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary LesIon AssessmeNT: the RELIANT pragmatic randomized trial.Paez, R., Lentz, RJ., Salmon, C., et al.[2023]

Citations

Outcomes of the electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy ...However, procedure-related complications, especially pneumothorax and hemorrhage, have been reported in up to 61% and 5% to 16.9%, respectively.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineThe diagnostic yield for ENB is 49%, which increases to 59% with the addition of same-day CT, EBUS, and EMN-TTNA, lower than in prior reports in the literature.
Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary ...ENB demonstrates low complications and a 67.8% diagnostic yield while allowing biopsy, staging, fiducial placement, and dye marking in a single procedure.
Diagnostic yield and safety of navigation bronchoscopyThis systematic review analyses the diagnostic yield and safety of navigation bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules ...
Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral ...The NAVIGATE results are the most robust and generalizable ENB data yet collected in the bronchoscopic literature and show that a diagnosis can ...
Diagnostic yield and safety of navigation bronchoscopyThis systematic review analyses the diagnostic yield and safety of navigation bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules suspected of lung ...
Meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield and safety of ...Conclusions: ENB is an effective and safe procedure in diagnosing peripheral lung lesions. Keywords: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB); lung nodules ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security