112 Participants Needed

Surgical Methods for Vulvar Dysplasia

AP
MD
Overseen ByMaggie Dzhanumova
Age: 18+
Sex: Female
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial explores two surgical methods to treat high-grade vulvar dysplasia, a condition with abnormal cells on the vulva. The researchers aim to determine if "Frozen-Section Directed Excision," a method used in skin surgery, is more effective than the current standard, "Wide Local Excision." Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these treatments to evaluate which offers better outcomes. This trial may suit individuals diagnosed with high-grade vulvar dysplasia and scheduled for surgery soon. As an unphased trial, it offers participants the chance to contribute to medical research that could enhance surgical outcomes for future patients.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial requires that you have not taken immunosuppressant medications (like those for HIV, organ transplants, or chronic steroid use) in the last 30 days. If you're on these, you may need to stop before joining.

What prior data suggests that these surgical methods are safe for treating vulvar dysplasia?

Research has shown that Frozen-Section Directed Excision (FSDE) is a dependable surgical method, particularly in skin-related procedures, for accurately identifying the edges of abnormal tissue. One study found FSDE to be nearly perfect in confirming the complete removal of abnormal tissue, with an accuracy rate of 98.6%. This precision helps avoid unnecessary removal of healthy skin.

Wide Local Excision is a well-known method for treating vulvar dysplasia, involving the removal of a larger area around the abnormal tissue to ensure complete excision. This technique is usually recommended when cancer is not suspected.

Both methods are surgical procedures with some differences. FSDE, though newer for this application, shows promise in reducing residual abnormal tissue. Wide Local Excision has been used longer and is safe for non-cancerous lesions. Both methods are considered safe, but FSDE might offer more precise removal of affected tissue.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about exploring different surgical methods for vulvar dysplasia, focusing on Frozen-Section Directed Excision and Wide Local Excision. Unlike standard treatments that often rely on visual identification and excision with broader margins, Frozen-Section Directed Excision offers a more precise approach by allowing surgeons to make smaller, 1 mm excisions around the lesion site. This could potentially lead to better outcomes by reducing the removal of healthy tissue and preserving more of the surrounding area. By comparing this method to the traditional Wide Local Excision, which uses 5 mm margins, the trial aims to find out whether more targeted excision can provide similar or better results with less impact on the patient's quality of life.

What evidence suggests that this trial's surgical methods could be effective for vulvar dysplasia?

Research has shown that Frozen-Section Directed Excision, one of the surgical methods studied in this trial, is a promising approach for treating severe vulvar dysplasia. This technique resembles Mohs Surgery, which is effective in skin treatments. Studies have demonstrated its high accuracy, with a 98.6% success rate in identifying the edges of the affected area, allowing precise removal of diseased tissue while preserving healthy tissue.

In contrast, Wide Local Excision, another method under study, is a well-known approach for this condition. It involves removing a larger area around the abnormal tissue to ensure all unhealthy cells are taken out. This method is often recommended when there is a risk of the disease spreading, as it provides effective treatment with lower chances of recurrence. Both methods are being studied for their effectiveness in managing vulvar dysplasia, offering options based on the specific needs of each case.12345

Who Is on the Research Team?

RW

Robert W Naumann, MD

Principal Investigator

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults over 18 with high-grade vulvar dysplasia who can consent, read English/Spanish, and likely have surgery within 90 days. It's not for those who've had pelvic radiation, are on immunosuppressants, or currently receiving cancer treatment.

Inclusion Criteria

Ability and willingness of the subject to comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study
Written informed consent and HIPAA authorization for release of personal health information
My surgery is scheduled within the next 3 months.
See 3 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have had radiation therapy in the pelvic area.
Known immunodeficiency syndrome
Surgery isn't possible for me due to the tumor's location near critical areas.
See 2 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Participants undergo either Frozen-Section Directed Excision or Wide Local Excision surgery

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Recovery and Initial Follow-up

Participants are monitored for recovery, pain management, and initial wound healing

2 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for recurrence rates, quality of life, and sexual function

6 months
2 visits (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Frozen-Section Directed Excision
  • Wide Local Excision
Trial Overview The study compares two surgical methods for treating vulvar dysplasia: 'Frozen-Section Directed Excision' (a dermatology technique) versus the standard 'Wide Local Excision'. The goal is to see which method is more effective.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Frozen-Section Directed Excision VulvectomyExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Wide Local Excision VulvectomyActive Control1 Intervention

Frozen-Section Directed Excision is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Mohs Micrographic Surgery for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Mohs Micrographic Surgery for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Frozen Section Technique for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,432
Recruited
2,506,000+

Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute

Collaborator

Trials
30
Recruited
4,700+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a 5-year study analyzing 7,921 frozen section evaluations, vulvar cancer specimens accounted for 10.6%, with a 100% accuracy rate for assessing Cloquet nodes and 98.6% for resection margin status.
The average time for frozen section analysis of vulvectomy specimens was 24.5 minutes, suggesting that standardized procedures for handling these specimens could enhance surgical outcomes in vulvar cancer treatment.
Frozen section analysis of vulvectomy specimens: results of a 5-year study period.Horn, LC., Wagner, S.[2010]
Wide local excision was successfully performed on three patients with early-stage vulvar melanoma, with no evidence of recurrence during long-term follow-up.
The study suggests that wide local excision with adequate tumor-free margins is an effective treatment option for early-stage vulvar melanomas.
Conservative surgical treatment for early-stage vulvar malignant melanoma.Nasu, K., Kai, Y., Ohishi, M., et al.[2009]
Mohs micrographic surgery is a highly effective method for removing certain skin cancers, focusing on excising tumors with minimal damage to surrounding healthy tissue.
This technique allows for immediate examination of the excised tissue, ensuring complete removal of the cancerous cells, especially in cases of aggressive or recurrent tumors located in sensitive areas.
A primer of Mohs micrographic surgery: common indications.Nouri, K., Rivas, MP.[2019]

Citations

A Study Evaluating the Effect of Frozen-Section Directed ...The purpose of this study is to compare "Frozen-Section Directed Excision", which has been a proven method of surgery used in dermatology, ...
A Study Evaluating the Effect of Frozen-Section Directed ...The purpose of this study is to compare "Frozen-Section Directed Excision", which has been a proven method of surgery used in dermatology, ...
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study evaluating ...Our study seeks to compare this current standard of care with a frozen section directed excision, which is similar to Mohs Surgery, a long- ...
A Study Evaluating the Effect of Frozen-Section DirectedThis clinical trial is studying a surgical technique called "Frozen-Section Directed Excision" to treat a condition known as high-grade vulvar dysplasia, which ...
5.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20173502/
Frozen section analysis of vulvectomy specimensThe accuracy rate of vulval frozen section analyses was 100% for the evaluation of Cloquet node, and 98.6% for the margin status.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security