100 Participants Needed

TFL vs MOSES Laser for Bladder Cancer

RS
SL
Overseen ByShalyn Littlefield
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine if there is difference in pathological and clinical outcomes between MOSES and TFL in the transurethral laser enucleation of bladder tumors. The main question it aims to answer is: Is there a difference in pathological and clinical outcomes between MOSES Holmium and Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) in the transurethral laser enucleation of bladder tumors? Participants will randomized to either TFL of MOSES arm for their bladder resection procedure.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the MOSES Laser treatment for bladder cancer?

Research shows that the MOSES Laser technology, when used for other conditions like stone disease, can be efficient in terms of procedure time and cost. Additionally, the MOSES technology has been compared favorably to other laser systems in terms of speed and cost-effectiveness for treating large bladder stones, suggesting potential benefits for bladder cancer treatment.12345

Is the MOSES or TFL laser generally safe for use in humans?

The MOSES and TFL lasers have been studied for various conditions, such as stone disease and prostate enlargement, and have shown similar complication rates to other laser technologies, indicating they are generally safe for use in humans.12456

What makes the MOSES Laser and TFL treatment unique for bladder cancer?

The MOSES Laser and TFL treatment for bladder cancer is unique because it uses advanced laser technology to potentially improve efficiency and reduce procedure time compared to traditional methods. The MOSES technology, in particular, is designed to enhance laser energy delivery, which may lead to faster and more cost-effective procedures.12347

Research Team

AZ

Ahmed Z Ahmed

Principal Investigator

Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults over 18 who have visible bladder tumors identified by outpatient cystoscopy. It's not for those with urethral or upper urinary tract tumors, a history of carcinoma in situ, contracted bladder, or tumors unsuitable for laser resection like muscle-invasive or metastatic cancers.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients presented with visual criteria suggesting bladder tumor by outpatient cystoscopy will be eligible for inclusion
I am over 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

My tumor cannot be removed with laser surgery as determined by a urologist.
I have tumors in my urethra or upper urinary tract at the same time.
I have had a non-invasive type of cancer.
See 1 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo bladder resection using either the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) or MOSES Holmium laser

Intraoperative
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for tumor recurrence and post-operative complications

12 weeks
Multiple visits (in-person)

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • MOSES Holmium Laser
  • TFL
Trial Overview The study compares two types of lasers: MOSES holmium and Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL), used in the transurethral enucleation of bladder tumors. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the TFL or MOSES group for their procedure.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Thulium Fibre LaserActive Control1 Intervention
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo bladder resection using the TFL laser
Group II: MOSES HolmoniumActive Control1 Intervention
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo bladder resection using the MOSES holmium laser.

MOSES Holmium Laser is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Holmium Laser for:
  • Kidney stones
  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
  • Urinary tract stones
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Holmium Laser for:
  • Kidney stones
  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
  • Urinary tract stones
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Holmium Laser for:
  • Kidney stones
  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
  • Urinary tract stones

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute

Lead Sponsor

Trials
11
Recruited
860+

Findings from Research

In a study of 176 ureteroscopy cases, the use of Moses technology with the Lumenis Pulse P120H holmium laser did not significantly improve procedural efficiency compared to the regular mode, as measured by procedural time, fragmentation time, and energy used.
There were no significant differences in complication rates or stone-free rates between the Moses and regular modes, suggesting that while Moses technology may have potential benefits, they were not evident in this analysis.
Clinical Impact of the Institution of Moses Technology on Efficiency During Retrograde Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: Single-Center Experience.Knoedler, MA., Li, S., Best, SL., et al.[2022]
In a study comparing different lasers for treating bladder stones, the 120 W holmium laser with MOSES technology was the fastest, completing procedures in about 68.3 minutes, while the 30 W holmium laser took significantly longer at 297.5 minutes.
The thulium fiber laser (TFL) was faster than the 30 W holmium laser but less efficient than higher power lasers, and it was not cost-effective for large stones compared to the 100 W holmium laser, indicating that laser power is crucial for efficiency in these procedures.
Which Laser System Is Optimal for Cystolithotripsy of Large Bladder Calculi?Hajiha, M., Farkouh, A., Amasyali, AS., et al.[2023]
In a study of 41 patients with recurrent superficial bladder cancer treated with the holmium:YAG laser, the local recurrence rate was significantly lower (10%) compared to previous cystodiathermy treatments (32%), indicating improved efficacy of the laser treatment.
The holmium:YAG laser treatment was well-tolerated, with 83% of patients reporting low pain levels and high satisfaction, making it a safe and effective outpatient option for managing bladder cancer.
Holmium:YAG laser treatment of recurrent superficial bladder carcinoma: initial clinical experience.Syed, HA., Biyani, CS., Bryan, N., et al.[2016]

References

Clinical Impact of the Institution of Moses Technology on Efficiency During Retrograde Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: Single-Center Experience. [2022]
Which Laser System Is Optimal for Cystolithotripsy of Large Bladder Calculi? [2023]
Holmium:YAG laser treatment of recurrent superficial bladder carcinoma: initial clinical experience. [2016]
Comparative analysis of MOSESTM technology versus novel thulium fiber laser (TFL) for transurethral enucleation of the prostate: A single-institutional study. [2022]
Initial Clinical Experience with a Modulated Holmium Laser Pulse-Moses Technology: Does It Enhance Laser Lithotripsy Efficacy? [2020]
Comparison of Different Pulse Modulation Modes for Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Lithotripsy Ablation in a Benchtop Model. [2023]
Effectiveness and Safety of Thulium Fiber Laser in the Conservative Management of Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. [2022]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security