94 Participants Needed

Nephroureterectomy With and Without Lymph Node Removal for Bladder Cancer

Recruiting at 3 trial locations
ME
RC
Overseen ByRebecca Campbell, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Stay on Your Current MedsYou can continue your current medications while participating
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 5 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests whether removing lymph nodes during surgery for upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (a type of bladder cancer) improves cancer outcomes. Participants will undergo surgery either with or without lymph node removal. Researchers aim to determine if removing lymph nodes helps patients remain cancer-free longer and affects overall survival. The trial seeks individuals diagnosed with this specific cancer who are scheduled for nephroureterectomy (kidney and ureter surgery). As an unphased trial, it offers participants the chance to contribute to important research that could enhance future cancer treatments.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that nephroureterectomy, the removal of a kidney and ureter, is generally a safe procedure for treating upper tract urothelial carcinoma, a type of bladder cancer. Removing some lymph nodes during the surgery helps doctors understand the cancer's stage and may aid in treatment if the cancer hasn't spread extensively.

Previous studies found that lymph node removal did not significantly extend patient survival, but it provides valuable information for planning further treatment. Importantly, adding this step to the surgery is safe and does not significantly increase risk for patients.

Overall, both nephroureterectomy and lymph node removal are considered safe procedures with a manageable risk of complications.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about these treatments because they offer new insights into managing bladder cancer. Nephroureterectomy, a surgical procedure typically used for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), is being evaluated both with and without lymph node dissection (LND). While standard treatment often includes nephroureterectomy combined with LND to potentially improve outcomes, this trial seeks to determine if omitting LND can be just as effective, potentially minimizing surgical risks and recovery time for patients. This could lead to a more personalized approach to treating bladder cancer, refining how surgery is utilized based on patient needs.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for bladder cancer?

This trial will compare nephroureterectomy with and without lymph node dissection for bladder cancer. Research has shown that removing lymph nodes during kidney cancer surgery can extend life for some patients. One study found this particularly true when following a specific surgical method. However, other research suggests that while lymph node removal provides valuable information about the cancer, it doesn't always extend patient survival. Thus, while the procedure can enhance understanding of the cancer, it may not prolong life for every patient. For those considering this treatment, these findings highlight both potential benefits and limitations.13467

Who Is on the Research Team?

ME

Mohamed Eltemamy, MD

Principal Investigator

Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

AC

Adam Calaway, MD, MPH

Principal Investigator

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for individuals with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma, a type of bladder cancer. The study is looking to include people who are candidates for surgery called nephroureterectomy. Specific eligibility criteria were not provided.

Inclusion Criteria

I am scheduled for surgery to remove my kidney and ureter.
I have been diagnosed with upper tract urothelial cancer through a biopsy.
My cancer is localized and has not spread to lymph nodes or other parts of the body.
See 3 more

Exclusion Criteria

The participant has a psychiatric disorder that precludes them from understanding the consent process.
My lymph nodes are enlarged and need to be removed.
My cancer has spread to distant parts of my body.
See 2 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo nephroureterectomy with or without lymph node dissection for upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma

Surgical procedure

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for oncologic outcomes, including recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival

2 years

Adjuvant Therapy Evaluation

Evaluation of the use of adjuvant therapies post-surgery

2 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Lymph Node Dissection
  • Nephroureterectomy
Trial Overview The study tests the effectiveness of lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy in improving cancer outcomes like recurrence-free survival over two years and overall survival rates. Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo surgery with or without lymph node dissection.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Nephroureterectomy With Lymph Node DissectionExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Group II: Nephroureterectomy Without Lymph Node DissectionActive Control1 Intervention

Nephroureterectomy is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada, Japan, China for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Radical Nephroureterectomy for:
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Radical Nephroureterectomy for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Radical Nephroureterectomy for:
🇯🇵
Approved in Japan as Radical Nephroureterectomy for:
🇨🇳
Approved in China as Radical Nephroureterectomy for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
472
Recruited
33,400+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer, showing long-term oncologic outcomes that are comparable across open, laparoscopic, and robotic techniques.
Factors such as perioperative chemotherapy, patient health conditions (like chronic kidney disease and diabetes), and tumor characteristics (like stage and grade) significantly influence survival outcomes, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment strategies.
Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.Grob, G., Rogers, D., Pandolfo, SD., et al.[2023]
In a study of 28 patients with upper tract carcinoma in situ (UT-CIS), BCG instillations showed a complete response in 58.8% of renal units, indicating that it can be an effective conservative treatment option.
There were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival or cancer-specific survival between patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and those treated with BCG, suggesting that BCG can be a viable alternative to RNU for managing UT-CIS.
Management of primary upper urinary tract carcinoma in situ diagnosed by ureteroscopic biopsy: Is bacillus Calmette-Guerin an alternative to nephroureterectomy?Territo, A., Fontanet, S., Meneghetti, I., et al.[2023]
In a study of 451 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical nephroureterectomy, patients aged 80 years and older showed similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates compared to younger patients, indicating that the surgery is effective regardless of age.
However, overall survival (OS) was significantly poorer in patients aged 80 and older, with age being identified as an independent risk factor for decreased OS, suggesting that while surgery is beneficial, older patients may face other health challenges affecting their long-term survival.
Noninferior oncological outcomes in adults aged 80 years or older compared with younger patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Yamada, Y., Ikeda, M., Hirayama, T., et al.[2023]

Citations

Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro- ...The aim of this study was to summarize the current knowledge concerning the indication, anatomical template, prognostic, and therapeutic roles of lymph node ...
2.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35377778/
Analysis of the ROBUUST RegistryLND during nephroureterectomy in patients with positive lymph nodes provides prognostic data, but is not associated with improved OS.
Potential Benefit of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical ...LND improves survival in patients with high-stage disease of the renal pelvis, if it is performed according to an anatomical template-based approach.
Effect of lymph node dissection on stage-specific survival in ...We aimed to estimate the stage-specific impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on survival for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma ...
Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial CarcinomaThis narrative review aims to evaluate the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and its implications ...
Urothelial Cancer Lymphadenectomy at the Time of ...An extended LND can provide better disease staging and may be curative in patients with limited nodal disease.
Prospective Clinical Trial of the Oncologic Outcomes and ...Purpose: To determine the safety and feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security