MRI-Guided Prostate Boosts for Prostate Cancer

(BLaStM Trial)

PN
Overseen ByPavel Noa Hechavarria
Age: 18+
Sex: Male
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Miami
Must be taking: Anti-androgens
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to improve prostate cancer treatment by using high-dose radiation targeted to high-risk tumor areas identified by MRI, while protecting nearby organs. Researchers are studying two radiation methods: HEIGHT RT and LEAD RT, both forms of stereotactic body radiation therapy, each with a unique schedule. The trial seeks participants with confirmed prostate cancer, no signs of spreading, and no history of pelvic radiation or prostate removal surgery. As an unphased trial, this study offers a unique opportunity to advance prostate cancer treatment strategies.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial protocol does not specify if you need to stop your current medications. However, if you are on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), there are specific guidelines you must follow. Please discuss with your doctor for more details.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial protocol does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), there are specific guidelines about its use during the trial.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that both HEIGHT RT and LEAD RT therapies are generally well-tolerated by prostate cancer patients. Studies indicate that HEIGHT RT is safe for those with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer, with patients experiencing good results and few side effects.

Regarding LEAD RT, research supports its use and shows a promising safety record. Some studies mention moderate stomach and digestion problems, as well as sexual side effects, but these are not very common.

Overall, these treatments have demonstrated a good balance of effectiveness and safety, based on the available evidence.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about these treatments because HEIGHT RT and LEAD RT offer innovative approaches to delivering radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Unlike standard radiotherapy, both treatments use advanced imaging techniques to precisely target cancer cells, potentially minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. HEIGHT RT employs a hypofractionated schedule, meaning higher doses per session over a shorter timeframe, which could enhance efficiency and reduce treatment duration. Meanwhile, LEAD RT involves an extreme ablative dose approach in a lattice pattern, potentially increasing the intensity of the attack on cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue. These techniques could lead to more effective and less invasive treatment options for prostate cancer patients.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for prostate cancer?

Research has shown that both HEIGHT RT and LEAD RT, studied in this trial, are promising treatments for prostate cancer. Participants may receive HEIGHT RT, where studies indicate that a high dose of radiation can help prevent cancer recurrence. This method also targets high-risk areas more precisely, reducing harm to nearby healthy tissues.

Alternatively, participants may receive LEAD RT, which uses a precise form of radiation therapy known as stereotactic ablative radiation. This method has proven effective in treating prostate cancer and is known for being convenient and cost-effective. Both treatments in this trial focus on delivering high doses of radiation to the tumor while protecting healthy tissue, helping to maintain quality of life.12345

Who Is on the Research Team?

Alan Pollack MD PhD Miller School of ...

Alan Pollack, MD

Principal Investigator

University of Miami

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

Men aged 35-85 with confirmed prostate cancer (adenocarcinoma), T1-T3 stage, Gleason score 6-10, and PSA ≤100 ng/mL. No metastasis or previous radical prostate surgery/radiotherapy. Androgen deprivation therapy is allowed if decided before joining. Participants must be able to consent and willing to complete quality of life assessments.

Inclusion Criteria

My prostate cancer has a Gleason score between 6 and 10.
Suspicious peripheral zone or central gland lesion on MP-MRI
My prostate cancer is confirmed by biopsy.
See 8 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have a history of disorders related to lymphocyte proliferation.
I have a history of cancer.
I do not have any active cancer except for non-spreading skin cancer or early chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
See 4 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either HEIGHT or LEAD radiotherapy, consisting of 39 fractions over approximately 7.5 to 8 weeks

7.5-8 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including MRI-directed biopsy results at 2-2.5 years

Up to 5.25 years

Long-term Monitoring

Participants' health-related quality of life and other outcomes are assessed up to 5.25 years post-treatment

Up to 5.25 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • HEIGHT RT
  • LEAD RT
Trial Overview The study tests adding a high dose radiation treatment targeting MRI-defined high-risk tumor areas in the prostate, on top of standard radiation therapy, aiming to control cancer while sparing nearby organs from excess radiation.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: LEAD RT GroupExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: HEIGHT RT GroupExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

HEIGHT RT is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as SBRT for:
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as SBRT for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as SBRT for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Miami

Lead Sponsor

Trials
976
Recruited
423,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a phase 3 randomized clinical trial involving 156 men with localized prostate cancer, MRI-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) significantly reduced the incidence of acute grade 2 or greater genitourinary toxic effects compared to CT guidance (24.4% vs 43.4%; P=0.01).
MRI guidance also led to fewer gastrointestinal toxic effects and better patient-reported outcomes, with a lower percentage of patients experiencing significant increases in urinary symptoms and decreases in bowel quality of life scores at 1 month post-treatment.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided vs Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: The MIRAGE Randomized Clinical Trial.Kishan, AU., Ma, TM., Lamb, JM., et al.[2023]
In a comparison of two treatment methods for high-risk prostate cancer, the SABR boost showed a significantly lower rate of biochemical failure (0%) compared to the HDR-BT boost (18.2%) over a median follow-up of 62 to 72 months, suggesting better efficacy for SABR.
Both treatment methods resulted in similar levels of acute and late toxicity, with minimal impact on quality of life, indicating that SABR may be a safe alternative to HDR-BT for patients undergoing pelvic radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy.
Gantry-Based 5-Fraction Elective Nodal Irradiation in Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: Outcomes From 2 Prospective Studies Comparing SABR Boost With MR Dose-Painted HDR Brachytherapy Boost.Musunuru, HB., Cheung, P., Vesprini, D., et al.[2022]
In a study of 84 low-risk prostate cancer patients treated with Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR), long-term quality of life (QOL) outcomes were generally positive, with a median follow-up of 50.8 months, although some patients reported declines in urinary (17.9%), bowel (26.2%), and sexual (37.5%) QOL domains.
Dosimetric factors such as rectal D1cc and penile bulb V35 were identified as significant predictors of worse QOL, highlighting the importance of adhering to strict dosimetric constraints to minimize side effects from treatment.
Dosimetric and patient correlates of quality of life after prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.Elias, E., Helou, J., Zhang, L., et al.[2018]

Citations

Outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic body ...Treatment of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer with a high BED has been shown to increase recurrence free survival (RFS).
Hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiation Therapy With ...Conclusion: Targeting areas at high-risk for occult disease with a lower radiation dose, while simultaneously boosting gross disease with HIGRT in patients with ...
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Radiosurgery ...External beam radiation therapy (RT) is a safe and effective curative treatment modality for men with localized prostate cancer (PCa). While ...
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Primary Prostate CancerThis review will outline the efficacy and toxicity outcomes of SBRT and highlight specific issues and controversies surrounding patient ...
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate ...Purpose Radiation dose intensification improves outcome in men with high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa). A prospective trial was conducted to ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security