14000 Participants Needed

Interventions for Peripheral Arterial Disease

(XLPAD Trial)

Recruiting at 8 trial locations
IT
DF
Overseen ByDavid Fernandez Vazquez, MD
Age: Any Age
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Baylor Research Institute
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatments for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), a condition where leg arteries narrow. It compares the outcomes of using stents (tiny tubes that keep arteries open) with other non-stent therapies. The study will monitor whether these treatments improve symptoms and overall health, such as walking ability, over a year. Suitable participants have undergone a procedure to open leg arteries but not in the pelvic area and have not experienced a failed attempt or surgery for the condition. As a Phase 3 trial, this study represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants the opportunity to contribute to a potentially groundbreaking treatment.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. Treatment decisions are up to your care team, so it's best to discuss this with them.

What prior data suggests that these stent and non-stent based therapies are safe for PAD patients?

Research has shown that treatments without stents can be safe for some patients. For instance, one study found that avoiding stents in patients with certain heart conditions did not worsen outcomes if there was no severe blockage. Another study found that balloon angioplasty, which uses a small balloon to open blood vessels, was successful and resulted in few major limb problems a year later.

Different types of stents have also been researched. One study found that polymer-permanent everolimus stents have a lower risk of complications compared to others. Generally, many stents are considered safe and well-tolerated, though risks such as possible blood vessel issues after the procedure exist.

Both treatment options have been studied for safety with generally positive results, but each has its own considerations.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about the treatments for Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) in this trial because they explore both non-stent and stent-based therapies, offering a broader range of options compared to traditional stenting alone. Non-stent based therapies could offer less invasive solutions, potentially reducing recovery time and complications. Meanwhile, advancements in stent technology aim to improve durability and flexibility, which might lead to better long-term outcomes and fewer repeat procedures. These innovations could significantly enhance the quality of life for individuals with PAD, making them promising areas of study.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for PAD?

Research has shown that treatments using stents for conditions like peripheral artery disease (PAD) can be very effective. Patients who received stents experienced fewer heart-related problems, such as heart attacks. Balloon angioplasty also works well, showing high initial success and similar rates of serious leg issues after one year compared to stents. Both treatments improve symptoms and help patients walk farther. These findings suggest that both stent-based and non-stent-based therapies could effectively manage PAD.36789

Who Is on the Research Team?

SB

Subhash Banerjee, MD

Principal Investigator

Baylor Research Institute

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

Inclusion Criteria

Underwent Endovascular Intervention
Treated Superficial Femoral, Popliteal, Peroneal, Anterior Tibial, or Posterior Tibial Arteries

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

Treatment

Patients undergo endovascular intervention with stent or non-stent based therapies

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

12 months
Follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Non-stent based therapies
  • Stent-based therapies

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Baylor Research Institute

Lead Sponsor

Trials
210
Recruited
205,000+

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,102
Recruited
1,077,000+

Boston Scientific Corporation

Industry Sponsor

Trials
758
Recruited
867,000+
Michael F. Mahoney profile image

Michael F. Mahoney

Boston Scientific Corporation

Chief Executive Officer since 2016

MBA from Wake Forest University, BBA in Finance from the University of Iowa

Kenneth Stein profile image

Kenneth Stein

Boston Scientific Corporation

Chief Medical Officer since 2020

MD from Harvard Medical School, MMSc in Clinical Investigation from Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology

Citations

1.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39111561/
Clinical Outcomes of Non-Stent-Based Interventions for ...This report explores immediate procedural success and major adverse limb events at 1 year after balloon angioplasty treatment for isolated BTK ...
Clinical Outcomes of Nonโ€“Stent-Based Interventions for ...Nonstent treatment for BTK PAD with concomitant FP intervention leads to high procedural success and similar rates of 1-year MALE compared with isolated BTK ...
Clinical outcomes of no stenting in patients with ST ...During a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the composite endpoint occurred in 14% and 16% in the no and immediate stenting groups, respectively (unadjusted hazard ...
Clinical Outcomes of Nonโ€“Stent-Based Interventions for ...Nonstent treatment for BTK PAD with concomitant FP intervention leads to high procedural success and similar rates of 1-year MALE compared with ...
Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD)XLPAD is an observational study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and use of stent and non-stent based therapies among peripheral artery disease (PAD) ...
Clinical outcomes of no stenting in patients with ST-segment ...Our findings suggest that it is safe to omit stenting in patients with STEMI if there is no flow-limiting underlying stenosis in the culprit lesion and a stable ...
Stents, bypass surgery show no benefit in heart disease ...Among patients who reported daily or weekly chest pain at the start of the study, 50% of those treated invasively were found to be angina-free ...
Aspirin Monotherapy vs No Antiplatelet Therapy in Stable ...This study aimed to compare continuing aspirin monotherapy vs temporarily holding all antiplatelet therapy before noncardiac surgery in patients with previous ...
Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate ...EROSION study demonstrates that for ACS patients caused by plaque erosion (residual diameter stenosis < 70%), anti-thrombotic therapy without stenting is safe, ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of ServiceยทPrivacy PolicyยทCookiesยทSecurity