150 Participants Needed

Goal-Directed CPR for Cardiac Arrest

AG
TK
NL
Overseen ByNatalia Leontovich
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: NYU Langone Health
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The proposed study is a single-center, randomized controlled pilot trial of adults who suffer in-hospital cardiac arrests. Using cerebral oxygenation and end-tidal carbon dioxide physiological targets to predict survival and neurological outcome, the impact of physiological-feedback CPR will be assessed. 150 adult patients who have a cardiac arrest event at NYU Tisch Hospital will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: (1) Physiological-Feedback CPR or (2) Non-Physiological (Audiovisual) Feedback CPR.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Goal-Directed CPR for Cardiac Arrest?

Research shows that real-time feedback during CPR can improve the quality of the procedure, which is crucial for patient survival. Studies indicate that using feedback, whether through devices or human input, enhances CPR performance, suggesting that Goal-Directed CPR, which incorporates feedback, could be more effective.12345

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Goal-Directed CPR for Cardiac Arrest?

Research shows that real-time feedback during CPR can improve the quality of the procedure, which is crucial for patient survival. Studies indicate that both real-time and post-event feedback can enhance CPR performance, suggesting that feedback-guided CPR, like Goal-Directed CPR, may be more effective than standard methods.12345

Is Goal-Directed CPR generally safe for humans?

The research articles provided focus on the effectiveness of feedback systems in improving CPR performance, but they do not specifically address the safety of Goal-Directed CPR or related methods in humans.14678

How is Goal-Directed CPR for Cardiac Arrest different from other treatments?

Goal-Directed CPR for Cardiac Arrest is unique because it uses real-time feedback and cerebral oximetry (a method to measure oxygen levels in the brain) to guide CPR, aiming to improve the quality of chest compressions and patient outcomes compared to standard CPR methods.12359

How is Goal-Directed CPR for Cardiac Arrest different from other treatments?

Goal-Directed CPR for Cardiac Arrest is unique because it uses real-time feedback, including physiological data like cerebral oximetry (a measure of brain oxygen levels), to guide CPR efforts. This approach aims to improve the quality of CPR by providing immediate information to adjust techniques, potentially leading to better patient outcomes compared to standard CPR methods without such feedback.12359

Research Team

Sam Parnia, MD, PhD | NYU Langone Health

Sam Parnia, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

NYU Langone Health

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults aged 18-80 who experience a cardiac arrest inside NYU Tisch Hospital and require CPR for at least 5 minutes. It's not open to those with more than two acute organ failures, previous recent cardiac arrests, or certain brain conditions.

Inclusion Criteria

I am younger than 80 years old.
You recently had a cardiac arrest while in the hospital.
I am 18 years old or older.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

I am between 18 and 80 years old.
People who have had a heart attack outside of the hospital.
I have had 3 or more sudden organ failures.
See 5 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1-2 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either Physiological-Feedback CPR or Non-Physiological (Audiovisual) Feedback CPR during cardiac arrest events

Immediate during cardiac arrest

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for survival and neurological outcomes, including assessment of Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) Score

30 days

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Non-Physiological Feedback CPR
  • Physiological Feedback CPR
Trial OverviewThe study compares two types of CPR in a hospital setting: one using physiological feedback based on cerebral oxygen levels and another using non-physiological audiovisual cues to guide resuscitation efforts.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Physiological Feedback CPRExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Non-Physiological (Audiovisual) Feedback CPRActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

NYU Langone Health

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,431
Recruited
838,000+

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Collaborator

Trials
3,987
Recruited
47,860,000+

Findings from Research

Real-time objective feedback during CPR training significantly improved CPR performance among pre-hospital professionals, with a notable enhancement in infant assessment skills.
Competition between EMS organizations and participants motivated staff to practice more, indicating that incorporating competitive elements into training could further enhance CPR training effectiveness.
Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training--a prospective observational study from several European EMS.Smart, JR., Kranz, K., Carmona, F., et al.[2018]
Real-time feedback during CPR significantly improves the quality of chest compressions, specifically in terms of depth and rate, while post-event feedback enhances compression depth and fraction.
Although neither type of feedback statistically improved patient outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases, there was a clinical effect observed, suggesting that combining both feedback methods could enhance CPR quality.
Effect of real-time and post-event feedback in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by EMS - A systematic review and meta-analysis.Lyngby, RM., Hรคndel, MN., Christensen, AM., et al.[2022]
Recent evidence shows that the quality of CPR significantly impacts survival rates in cardiac arrest victims, highlighting the importance of effective CPR delivery.
Various strategies, including real-time feedback, physiological monitoring, and mechanical CPR devices, have been evaluated to enhance CPR performance, suggesting that a combination of these methods may improve outcomes in both prehospital and in-hospital settings.
The importance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality.Abella, BS.[2022]

References

Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training--a prospective observational study from several European EMS. [2018]
Effect of real-time and post-event feedback in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by EMS - A systematic review and meta-analysis. [2022]
The importance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality. [2022]
Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer BLS: a randomised simulation study. [2018]
Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department by real-time video recording and regular feedback learning. [2022]
A counterbalanced cross-over study of the effects of visual, auditory and no feedback on performance measures in a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. [2021]
Real-time feedback improves chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective cohort study. [2020]
Immediate and 1-year chest compression quality: effect of instantaneous feedback in simulated cardiac arrest. [2018]
Real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining system of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a study protocol for a cluster parallel-group randomized controlled trial. [2022]