700 Participants Needed

Sugary Drink Ban + Counseling for Metabolic Health Improvement

(MHIP Trial)

SS
Overseen BySweet Study Contact
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of California, San Francisco
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 2 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The purpose of the study is to test the impact of a multilevel workplace intervention (hospital-wide sales ban on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and individual-level brief counseling) on employee health.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Sugary Drink Ban + Counseling for Metabolic Health Improvement?

Research shows that counseling, especially when delivered through motivational interviewing and brief interventions, can lead to positive changes in dietary habits and metabolic health. For example, studies have found that telephone-delivered nutrition education and motivational interviewing can significantly reduce weight, body fat, and improve dietary behaviors, which are important for managing metabolic syndrome.12345

Is the Sugary Drink Ban + Counseling treatment safe for humans?

Research on motivational interviewing, a key part of this treatment, shows it is generally safe and has been used to help improve diet and weight management in various groups, including women with type 2 diabetes and caregivers for obesity prevention.36789

How is the Sugary Drink Ban + Counseling treatment different from other treatments for metabolic health improvement?

This treatment is unique because it combines a ban on sugary drinks with brief counseling using motivational interviewing, which helps patients set and achieve realistic lifestyle goals. Unlike other treatments that may focus solely on diet or medication, this approach emphasizes behavior change and self-management to improve metabolic health.310111213

Research Team

LA

Laura A Schmidt, Ph.D

Principal Investigator

University of California, San Francisco

EE

Elissa Epel, Ph.D

Principal Investigator

University of California, San Francisco

JS

Jamey Schmidt

Principal Investigator

Sutter Health/California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for full-time employees at certain Sutter Health sites who drink three or more sugary drinks a week, can speak and read English, and are willing to have two fasting blood tests. Pregnant individuals cannot participate.

Inclusion Criteria

Full-time employee who works on campus at one of the Sutter Health participating sites
You drink three or more sugary drinks every week.
Speaks and reads English
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnant

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Participants receive a workplace SSB sales ban and/or brief counseling intervention

12 months
1 initial video call, 2 booster phone calls

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in health metrics such as lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, and BMI

12 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Brief Intervention
  • Workplace SSB sales ban
Trial OverviewThe study examines the effects of not selling sugary drinks (SSBs) at work and giving motivational counseling on employee health, specifically focusing on insulin resistance and abdominal obesity.
Participant Groups
4Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Workplace SSB sales ban onlyExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants receive a workplace SSB sales ban (environmental intervention). This entails the removal of SSBs from all workplace sales outlets, replacing them with non-sugary beverage options.
Group II: Multilevel Intervention (workplace SSB sales ban + brief intervention)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
Sales ban: Participants receive a workplace SSB sales ban (environmental intervention). This entails the removal of SSBs from all workplace sales outlets, replacing them with non-sugary beverage options. Brief Intervention: Participants receive a 20-30 minute intervention by video call, with 2 booster telephone calls. One week and one month after the initial session, participants will have 10-minute check-in/booster phone calls.
Group III: Brief intervention onlyExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants receive a 20-30 minute intervention by video call, with 2 booster telephone calls. One week and one month after the initial session, participants will have 10-minute check-in/booster phone calls.
Group IV: Control: No workplace SSB sales ban, no brief interventionActive Control1 Intervention
Participants receive no workplace SSB sales ban (environmental intervention) and no brief counseling intervention.

Brief Intervention is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Brief Intervention for:
  • Alcohol misuse in HIV care
  • Substance use disorder
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Brief Intervention for:
  • Alcohol misuse
  • Substance use disorder

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of California, San Francisco

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2,636
Recruited
19,080,000+

Sutter Health

Collaborator

Trials
26
Recruited
68,900+

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Collaborator

Trials
2,513
Recruited
4,366,000+

California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute

Collaborator

Trials
44
Recruited
10,600+

Findings from Research

A study involving 71 adults with metabolic syndrome found that those receiving in-depth telephone-delivered nutrition education had significantly greater reductions in weight, body fat, and abdominal circumference compared to those who had a single visit with a dietitian.
After 3 months, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome decreased to 45.5% in the telephone counseling group, compared to 69.7% in the single-visit group, highlighting the effectiveness of ongoing dietary support through phone counseling.
Effect of the telephone-delivered nutrition education on dietary intake and biochemical parameters in subjects with metabolic syndrome.Kim, J., Bea, W., Lee, K., et al.[2021]
In a study involving 151 adults with type 2 diabetes, participants who completed more telephone counseling calls (up to 27 over 18 months) experienced a significant weight loss of -3.3% compared to those with low call completion.
While increased call completion was linked to greater weight loss, it did not show significant effects on other outcomes like physical activity or diet quality, highlighting the need for strategies to keep patients engaged in weight loss interventions, especially those with comorbid depression.
Relationship between intervention dose and outcomes in living well with diabetes--a randomized trial of a telephone-delivered lifestyle-based weight loss intervention.Goode, AD., Winkler, EA., Reeves, MM., et al.[2022]
Dietitians who received basic training in motivational interviewing (MI) showed significant improvements in their counseling style, becoming more empathetic and allowing patients to speak more during consultations.
Patients of MI-trained dietitians reported lower saturated fat intake, indicating that the training effectively influenced dietary habits, although there were no significant changes in other health parameters like HbA1c, BMI, or waist circumference.
Training dietitians in basic motivational interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their patients.Brug, J., Spikmans, F., Aartsen, C., et al.[2007]

References

Effect of the telephone-delivered nutrition education on dietary intake and biochemical parameters in subjects with metabolic syndrome. [2021]
Relationship between intervention dose and outcomes in living well with diabetes--a randomized trial of a telephone-delivered lifestyle-based weight loss intervention. [2022]
Training dietitians in basic motivational interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their patients. [2007]
Building skills, knowledge and confidence in eating and exercise behavior change: brief motivational interviewing training for healthcare providers. [2016]
Long-term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office. [2019]
Preliminary Support for the Use of Motivational Interviewing to Improve Parent/Adult Caregiver Behavior for Obesity and Cancer Prevention. [2023]
Office-based motivational interviewing to prevent childhood obesity: a feasibility study. [2007]
Motivational interviewing improves weight loss in women with type 2 diabetes. [2022]
Long-term effect of motivational interviewing on dietary intake and weight loss in Iranian obese/overweight women. [2020]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Tackling Obesity and Disease: The Culprit Is Sugar; the Response Is Legal Regulation. [2019]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The role of nutrition therapy and dietitians in the management of the metabolic syndrome. [2022]
Implementing a psychological intervention to improve lifestyle self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes. [2019]
Patients' experiences of lifestyle discussions based on motivational interviewing: a qualitative study. [2021]