Surgery vs Non-Surgery for Proximal Humerus Fractures

GI
Overseen ByGregory Iovanel, MD
Age: 65+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Massachusetts, Worcester
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial compares surgical and non-surgical options for treating shoulder fractures near the top of the arm (proximal humerus fractures). The goal is to determine which approach aids recovery more effectively after the injury. Participants will either undergo surgery, which may involve procedures such as intramedullary nail (a type of internal fixation), open reduction internal fixation (a surgical method to fix broken bones), or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (a type of shoulder replacement), or manage their condition without surgery. The trial seeks individuals aged 65 or older who have experienced this type of fracture. As an unphased trial, it offers participants the chance to contribute to valuable research that could enhance treatment options for future patients.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research shows that the treatments studied for shoulder fractures near the top of the arm bone have varying safety levels.

For intramedullary nails, studies report a complication rate of about 18.9%, with a 6.8% chance of requiring additional surgery. However, many patients experience good shoulder function after this treatment.

Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) can yield excellent results when performed correctly, but it may have higher complication rates and necessitate more follow-up surgeries compared to other methods.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has a lower complication rate of around 9.1% and reduces the likelihood of additional surgery by 63% compared to ORIF. It also tends to provide good long-term outcomes.

These findings suggest that while risks exist, each treatment is generally well-tolerated according to various studies.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about these treatments for proximal humerus fractures because they offer different approaches to shoulder repair. The intramedullary nail is less invasive and can promote faster recovery compared to traditional plates and screws. Open reduction internal fixation allows for precise alignment of bone fragments, potentially improving joint function and reducing long-term complications. Lastly, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is particularly beneficial for older patients with severe fractures, as it can restore shoulder function even when rotator cuff muscles are compromised. Each of these options provides distinct advantages over standard non-surgical management, offering hope for improved outcomes in diverse patient populations.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for proximal humerus fractures?

This trial will compare surgical and non-surgical approaches for treating upper arm bone fractures near the shoulder. Research has shown that various surgical methods, such as intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, lead to good recovery. Participants in the operative management arm of this trial may receive one of these surgical treatments. Intramedullary nailing often restores good movement and function, especially for simpler fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation are commonly used and effective, but the choice of treatment usually depends on the fracture's complexity. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is another option sometimes used for more severe cases. Overall, these surgeries have improved shoulder function and movement for many patients with these types of fractures.16789

Who Is on the Research Team?

WC

Wayne Chan, MD

Principal Investigator

UMass Chan Medical School

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for individuals with proximal humerus fractures, which are breaks near the top of the upper arm bone close to the shoulder. Details on who can join or reasons for exclusion aren't provided.

Inclusion Criteria

I am 65 or older with a shoulder fracture.

Exclusion Criteria

Not applicable.

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo either operative or non-operative management of proximal humerus fractures

24 months
Regular follow-ups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

24 months
Assessments at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • intramedullary nail
  • open reduction internal fixation
  • reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
Trial Overview The study is examining outcomes from different treatments: surgery involving plates and screws (open reduction internal fixation), shoulder replacement (reverse total shoulder arthroplasty), or a rod placed inside the bone (intramedullary nail).
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Non-operative ManagementActive Control1 Intervention
Group II: Operative ManagementActive Control3 Interventions

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Lead Sponsor

Trials
372
Recruited
998,000+

Citations

Clinical outcomes following intramedullary nailing of ...This study demonstrated that IMN of PHFs and humeral shaft fractures results in good functional outcomes and ROM. However, as the complexity of PHFs increased ...
Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus FracturesIMN. Procedure : reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ... open reduction internal fixation. Additional Relevant MeSH Terms.
Proximal humerus fractures: national treatment trends with ...Treatment options include nonoperative management, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty (HA), anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) ...
Outcomes of Non-Operative and Operative Treatment of ...Operative treatment options for proximal humerus fractures include percutaneous pinning, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), ...
Outcomes of intramedullary nailing for acute proximal ...Intramedullary nailing of acute, displaced two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures yields satisfactory clinical outcomes, although reoperation and ...
Complications following intramedullary nailing of proximal ...The overall complication rate for all fractures treated with intramedullary nails was 18.9%, and the overall revision rate was 6.8%. Among the complications ...
Straight intramedullary MultiLoc nails for displaced ...Our study demonstrated that MultiLoc nails is well suited for proximal humeral fractures, with satisfactory health status recovery, good radiographic results, ...
Intramedullary versus locking plate fixation for proximal ...The available evidence suggests that both intramedullary nails and locking plates can effectively restore shoulder function in the treatment of displaced ...
Functional Outcomes of Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing ...Antegrade IMIL nailing was a safe and effective treatment for humeral shaft fractures, offering predictable union rates, shorter operative times ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security