18 Participants Needed

MRI-Guided Surgery for Glioblastoma

Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 1
Sponsor: University of California, Los Angeles
Stay on Your Current MedsYou can continue your current medications while participating
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor to get a clear answer based on your specific situation.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment CEST PH MRI based resection of glioblastoma?

Research shows that using MRI during surgery helps remove more of the glioblastoma tumor, increasing the chances of complete removal and potentially extending patient survival. In studies, MRI guidance reduced leftover tumor volume and improved outcomes compared to traditional methods.12345

Is MRI-guided surgery for glioblastoma safe?

MRI-guided surgery, including techniques like intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) and preoperative functional MRI (fMRI), has been shown to reduce the risk of complications and improve surgical outcomes in brain tumor surgeries. Studies indicate that using these imaging techniques can lower the chance of functional deterioration after surgery and decrease the rate of adverse events compared to surgeries without these tools.16789

How does the MRI-guided surgery treatment for glioblastoma differ from other treatments?

This treatment uses MRI guidance during surgery to more precisely remove glioblastoma tumors, potentially increasing the amount of tumor removed compared to traditional methods. It allows surgeons to see real-time images of the brain, helping them to avoid healthy tissue and reduce the chance of leaving behind tumor cells.18101112

What is the purpose of this trial?

Current standard of care therapy and all FDA approved adjuvant therapy for glioblastoma continue to provide less than 12 months of progression free survival (PFS) and less than 24 months of overall survival (OS). There is an extreme need for any novel therapy against glioblastoma that increases progression free survival and overall survival in patients diagnosed with this invasive form of cancer. A significant reason for such a poor prognosis is the infiltrative nature of this tumor in non-enhancing regions (NE) beyond the central contrast-enhancing (CE) portion of tumor, which is difficult to visualize and treat with surgical, medical, or radiotherapeutic means.Since tumor cells exhibit abnormal metabolic behavior leading to extracellular acidification, we theorize a newly developed pH-sensitive MRI technique called amine chemical exchange saturation transfer echoplanar imaging (CEST-EPI) may identify infiltrating NE tumor beyond what is clear on standard MRI with gadolinium contrast. This phase I safety study will use use intraoperative CEST-EPI guided resections in glioblastoma at increasing distances from areas of CE tumor to test whether this technique is safe and can remove additional areas of infiltrative NE tumor.The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety of pH-sensitive amine CEST-EPI guided resections for glioblastoma.The secondary objectives of this study include:1. A preliminary efficacy analysis of CEST-EPI guided resections in extending progression free and overall survival.2. To confirm that resected tissue obtained from pH-sensitive amine CEST-EPI guided resections contain infiltrating NE tumor.The primary endpoint for this study will be safety of resecting "CEST positive", acidic regions within T2 hyperintense regions of glioblastoma thought to contain active NE tumor at increasing distances from contrast enhancing tumor with development of a recommended maximal tolerated resection.1. At the maximal tolerated resection, a preliminary efficacy study with endpoints of progression free survival (as defined by RANO Resect 2.0) 1 and overall survival.2. Quantitation of infilitrating tumor burden on CEST-EPI resected tissue using immunohistochemical staining.12 patients up to 24 patients based on resection limiting toxicities with potential expansion of up to 16 patients at the maximum tolerated resection.Inclusion Criteria:1. Must be able to provide written informed consent2. Male or female \> 18 years of age3. Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) \> 70 (indicating good performance status).4. Individuals with suspected, newly diagnosed or recurrent IDH wild type WHO IV glioblastoma (intraxial, expansile contrast-enhancing mass without evidence of metastatic disease. This will be reviewed by UCLA neuroradiology to only include patients with high likelihood of GBM)Exclusion Criteria:1. Pediatric patients2. Diagnostic uncertainty (reviewed by UCLA neuroradiology history extracranial malignancy or autoimmune disease)3. Medical conditions that make patients a poor candidate for anesthesia and/or surgery (decision for surgery will follow standard pre-operative clearance guidelines and will not differ for this specific study from standard of care treatment plan)4. Involvement of eloquent areas (as defined by MRI signal clearly involving areas that would lead to a qualifying neurologic deficit as defined in surgical limiting toxicity - this will specifically include: 1) primary motor cortex, 2) primary sensory cortex, 3) sensorimotor fibers as defined on pre-operative diffusion tensor imaging, 4) primary language areas (Broca, Wernicke), 5) arcuate fasiculus as defined on pre-operative diffusion tensor imaging Pre-operative: Standard of care pre-operative MRI including perfusion and pH-weighted amine CEST-EPI (which will add up to 15 minutes of scan time) for a single pre-operative exam prior to surgery.Surgery: 1 day (subjects to be admitted to the hospital) Follow-up: inpatient stay (1-3 days), 2 week clinical assessment (outpatient post-op clinic visit). MRI and clinical assessment at 4 weeks (end of resection limited toxicity window). Following this, there will be standard of care follow up with MRI and clinical assessment starting at 8 weeks +/- 4 weeks (per RANO 2.0). 1Total study duration for recruitment, enrollment, and study completion of all subjects is up to 2 years.Single-arm, surgical resection escalation safety trial with a preliminary efficacy study at the maximal tolerated resectionThis safety evaluation will mimic a phase 1 dose escalation safety study using a rule based approach on based on a i3+3 design.2 Using standard of care resection of contrast enhancement as the baseline, we will begin with 3 subjects with maximal resection + "CEST positive" areas 0.7 cm from the contrast enhancing boundary within areas of T2 hyperintensity. If there is not \> 1 pre-determined resection limiting toxicity (RLT, defined below) in this cohort, the r

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, a type of brain cancer. Participants must be eligible for standard care and FDA approved therapies. The study aims to include those who can potentially benefit from an advanced MRI technique during surgery.

Inclusion Criteria

I have been recently diagnosed with glioblastoma.
I am 18 years old or older.

Exclusion Criteria

Direct involvement of eloquent language or motor areas
No contrast enhancing tumor
I cannot undergo surgery for my glioblastoma.
See 1 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Pre-operative

Standard pre-operative medical clearance and MRI including gadolinium contrast and CEST-EPI

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Surgery

Intraoperative CEST-EPI guided resection of glioblastoma with biopsy and comparison using 5-ALA

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Post-operative Follow-up

Immediate post-operative MRI and monitoring for surgical complications

1-3 days inpatient, 4 weeks outpatient
1-3 days inpatient, 2 visits (outpatient)

Standard of Care Follow-up

Standard of care follow-up with MRI and clinical assessment starting at 8 weeks

Up to 24 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • CEST PH MRI based resection of glioblastoma
Trial Overview The trial tests whether using a pH-sensitive MRI method called CEST during surgery to remove glioblastoma improves survival rates. Patients are randomly chosen to either have this new technique or the standard treatment, comparing their progression-free and overall survival.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: CEST ResectionExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
CEST MRI Based Resection of glioblastoma with standard of care adjuvant therpay (temozolomide + radiation therapy)

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of California, Los Angeles

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,594
Recruited
10,430,000+

Findings from Research

In a study of 42 patients undergoing awake surgery for gliomas over 5 years, the overall complication rate was 59%, with 36% experiencing transient neurological deficits and 26% facing permanent deficits, indicating a significant risk of adverse events during this procedure.
Despite the high complication rate, the functional outcomes were promising, with all patients achieving a Karnofsky Performance Score of 80 or higher at 3-month follow-up, suggesting that awake surgery can be effective in preserving function while treating gliomas.
Standardized reporting of adverse events and functional status from the first 5 years of awake surgery for gliomas: a population-based single-institution consecutive series.Jensdottir, M., Beniaminov, S., Jakola, AS., et al.[2022]

References

The Impact of ioMRI on Glioblastoma Resection and Clinical Outcomes in a State-of-the-Art Neuro-Oncological Setup. [2023]
Intraoperative MRI to guide the resection of primary supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme--a quantitative radiological analysis. [2022]
Combining 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Fluorescence and Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Glioblastoma Surgery: A Histology-Based Evaluation. [2018]
[Intraoperative use of an open mid-field MR scanner in the surgical treatment of cerebral gliomas]. [2019]
[Influences of high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging on the extent of resection in low-grade gliomas]. [2012]
Can Preoperative Mapping with Functional MRI Reduce Morbidity in Brain Tumor Resection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 68 Observational Studies. [2021]
Application Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Medical Technology in the Perioperative Management of Brain Gliomas: Impact on Anesthesia and Prognosis. [2023]
Intraoperative MRI for newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma: a multicenter-registry comparative study to conventional surgery. [2020]
Standardized reporting of adverse events and functional status from the first 5 years of awake surgery for gliomas: a population-based single-institution consecutive series. [2022]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Neurosurgical approach. [2012]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Imaging Surrogates of Infiltration Obtained Via Multiparametric Imaging Pattern Analysis Predict Subsequent Location of Recurrence of Glioblastoma. [2018]
12.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Intraoperative tumor segmentation and volume measurement in MRI-guided glioma surgery for tumor resection rate control. [2006]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security