Colonoscopy vs FIT Screening for Colorectal Cancer
(CONFIRM Trial)
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial compares two methods of screening for colorectal cancer: colonoscopy and FIT (a stool test). The goal is to determine which method more effectively prevents deaths from colorectal cancer over 10 years. Colonoscopy is a one-time procedure that allows doctors to see inside the colon, while FIT is a yearly, simple at-home test that checks for hidden blood in the stool. The study seeks veterans aged 50 to 75 who haven't had a colonoscopy in the last 10 years or a stool test in the last year and who do not have symptoms or a family history indicating a higher risk of colorectal cancer. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity to contribute to important research that could enhance future screening methods.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. You will complete a medication questionnaire before randomization, but there is no mention of a requirement to stop any medications.
What prior data suggests that these screening methods are safe for colorectal cancer detection?
A previous study found that serious complications from colonoscopy, such as significant bleeding, are rare. On average, about 17.5 serious bleeding incidents occur for every 10,000 colonoscopies. Although colonoscopy is invasive, it allows doctors to examine the colon and remove suspicious growths.
Research has shown that the FIT (fecal immunochemical test) is well-tolerated and effective at detecting signs of colorectal cancer. As a non-invasive test, it does not involve instruments entering the body, making it easier for many people. Regular use of FIT has been shown to effectively reduce deaths from colorectal cancer.
Both tests offer benefits and potential drawbacks, but they are generally considered safe for most people.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about this trial because it directly compares two screening methods for colorectal cancer: colonoscopy and FIT (Fecal Immunochemical Test). While colonoscopy is a one-time, more invasive procedure that allows for direct visualization and removal of polyps, FIT is a non-invasive test that can be done annually at home to detect hidden blood in stool, which may indicate cancer. This trial could clarify which method is more effective or preferable for different patients, potentially leading to more personalized screening strategies. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach can help improve early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer.
What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for colorectal cancer screening?
This trial will compare colonoscopy with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Studies have shown that both methods effectively screen for CRC. Participants in one arm of this trial will undergo a one-time colonoscopy. Research indicates that colonoscopy can reduce the risk of developing CRC by allowing doctors to find and remove growths that could become cancerous. One study found that people who had colonoscopy screenings had a lower chance of getting CRC and dying from it. Participants in the other arm will use FIT annually. This non-invasive test is better than older tests at detecting blood in the stool, a potential cancer sign. FIT is considered a good option for detecting CRC, especially because it is easy for people to use at home. Both methods have shown promise, but their effectiveness can depend on how often they are used.14678
Who Is on the Research Team?
Jason A. Dominitz, MD MHS
Principal Investigator
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
Douglas J Robertson, MD MPH
Principal Investigator
White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for men and women aged 50-75, preferably veterans, who can consent to the study. It's not for those with severe health issues that make screening risky or unnecessary, pregnant individuals, people without a stable address, or anyone with a recent history of colon disease or tests.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants are randomized to either a one-time colonoscopy or annual FIT screening
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for colorectal cancer mortality and incidence
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Colonoscopy
- FIT
Trial Overview
The CONFIRM trial is comparing two colorectal cancer screening methods: annual fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) and colonoscopy. The goal is to see which method better reduces death from this cancer over ten years in people at average risk.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
FIT (annually)
Colonoscopy (one time screening)
Colonoscopy is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada, Japan, China, Switzerland for the following indications:
- Colorectal cancer screening
- Polyp removal
- Investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms
- Colorectal cancer screening
- Polyp removal
- Investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms
- Colorectal cancer screening
- Polyp removal
- Investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms
- Colorectal cancer screening
- Polyp removal
- Investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms
- Colorectal cancer screening
- Polyp removal
- Investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms
- Colorectal cancer screening
- Polyp removal
- Investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead Sponsor
Published Research Related to This Trial
Citations
1.
uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org
uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colorectal-cancer-screeningRecommendation: Colorectal Cancer: Screening
After 2 to 9 rounds of biennial gFOBT screening, colorectal cancer mortality was found to be lower at 11 to 30 years of follow-up (relative risk ...
Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy ...
This comparative effectiveness simulation study of 358 204 adults showed a statistically significant 7 percentage point reduction in colorectal cancer ...
New study examines the effectiveness of colonoscopies | CNN
Colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy were associated with a reduced incidence of cancer of the distal colorectum; colonoscopy was also associated with a modest ...
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal ...
In this randomized trial, the risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years was lower among participants who were invited to undergo screening colonoscopy.
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of ...
CMSmin reduced CRC incidence by 40% and CRC mortality by 52% vs no screening. These reductions were less profound than the 68%–79% and 73%–81%, respectively, ...
Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening - PMC
Early reports suggested that colonoscopic screening imparted a 90% risk reduction for colorectal cancer. Subsequent studies showed that estimate to be overly ...
Quality indicators for colonoscopy
High-quality colonoscopy includes adequate bowel preparation, safe colonoscope insertion to the proximal extent of the colon, detailed ...
Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Screening
As a part of the screening process, the ACS recommends that all positive results on noncolonoscopy screening tests should be followed up with timely colonoscopy ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.