30 Participants Needed

Nasal High Flow for COPD

SA
Overseen BySaramaria Afanador Castiblanco, M.D.
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Miami
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 4 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Nasal High Flow for COPD?

Research suggests that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) can improve breathing function in patients with COPD, especially during acute flare-ups. However, its impact on overall clinical outcomes, like reducing the need for more invasive breathing support, is still uncertain.12345

Is high-flow nasal cannula therapy safe for humans?

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is generally considered safe for humans, with studies showing it provides better or comparable oxygenation compared to traditional methods. Some side effects like nosebleeds, nasal discomfort, and dryness have been reported, but no unexpected side effects were found in the reviewed studies.23678

How is the nasal high flow treatment different from other treatments for COPD?

Nasal high flow (NHF) treatment is unique because it delivers a heated and humidified air-oxygen mixture through a nasal cannula at high flow rates, which can help improve breathing in COPD patients. Unlike traditional oxygen therapy, NHF can provide a more comfortable and effective way to support ventilation, especially during acute exacerbations.14579

What is the purpose of this trial?

This study aims to assess whether to describe the effects of the administration of nasal high flow (NHF) at 70 liters per minute (L/min) in a 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT) among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients and to characterize the association between self-reported dyspnea with and without NHF at 70 L/min following a 6-MWT.

Research Team

SA

Saramaria Afanador Castiblanco, M.D.

Principal Investigator

University of Miami

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who are able to perform a 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT). Specific eligibility criteria details were not provided, so it's important to contact the study organizers for more information on who can participate.

Inclusion Criteria

Able to consent
I use a low-flow nasal cannula at 4L/min or less, or I don't use supplemental oxygen.
I can walk on my own without help.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

I am currently on bedrest.
I am unable to understand or follow the study's requirements.
Pregnancy
See 3 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo a cross-over study with Nasal High Flow and Low Flow Cannula treatments, each for 30 minutes

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Nasal High Flow
Trial Overview The study is testing the effects of two types of oxygen delivery during exercise: high flow nasal cannula at 70 liters per minute and low flow. It measures how these affect exercise tolerance and breathlessness in COPD patients after walking for six minutes.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Nasal High Flow CannulaExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Nasal High Flow cannula at 70 liters per minute for 30 minutes. Given that this is a cross-over study, participants on this arm will be then crossed over to Nasal Low Flow Cannula at less than or equal to 4 liters per minute with supplemental oxygen for 30 minutes
Group II: Nasal Low Flow CannulaActive Control2 Interventions
Low Flow Nasal Cannula at less than or equal to 4 liters per minute with supplemental oxygen at patient's baseline for 30 minutes. Given that this is a cross-over study, participants on this arm will be then crossed over to High Flow Cannula at 70 liters per minute for 30 minutes

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Miami

Lead Sponsor

Trials
976
Recruited
423,000+

American Thoracic Society

Collaborator

Trials
12
Recruited
690+

Findings from Research

In a study of 337 patients with acute COPD exacerbation, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) did not significantly reduce the need for intubation compared to conventional oxygen therapy, indicating similar efficacy in this regard.
HFNC was associated with a longer hospital stay and higher costs compared to conventional oxygen therapy, suggesting that while it may not improve clinical outcomes, it could lead to increased resource use.
High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute COPD exacerbation with mild hypercapnia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Xia, J., Gu, S., Lei, W., et al.[2022]
Humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) significantly improves respiratory function in stable COPD patients, as evidenced by higher FEV1, FEV1%, and FEV1/FVC values compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT).
HFNC also enhances the quality of life and reduces adverse reactions in patients, with better blood gas analysis results (higher pH and PaO2, lower PaCO2) and improved exercise capacity, indicating its safety and efficacy.
Effect of humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on respiratory function recovery in stable COPD patients.Lyu, R., Wang, W., Wang, W., et al.[2022]
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy significantly reduces carbon dioxide levels (PaCO2) and length of hospital stay in patients with COPD and type II respiratory failure compared to noninvasive ventilation (NIV), based on a meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials involving 525 patients.
HFNC therapy also has a lower incidence of nasal facial skin breakdown compared to NIV, indicating it may be a safer option for patients, with no significant differences in other critical outcomes like oxygen levels, need for intubation, or mortality.
The efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in patients with COPD and type II respiratory failure: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Xu, Z., Zhu, L., Zhan, J., et al.[2022]

References

High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute COPD exacerbation with mild hypercapnia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. [2022]
Effect of humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on respiratory function recovery in stable COPD patients. [2022]
The efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in patients with COPD and type II respiratory failure: a meta-analysis and systematic review. [2022]
The use of high-flow nasal cannula in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease under exacerbation and stable phases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. [2023]
The Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Outside the ICU. [2020]
Comparison of High Flow Nasal Therapy with Non-Invasive Ventilation and Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. [2023]
7.United Arab Emiratespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
High Flow Through Nasal Cannula in Stable and Exacerbated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients. [2020]
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen in adult patients: a narrative review. [2022]
The clinical practice of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in adults: A Japanese cross-sectional multicenter survey. [2022]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security