330 Participants Needed

Education Intervention for Lung Cancer Screening Compliance

(QLC+ Trial)

NE
Overseen ByNicole Ezer, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Nicole Ezer, MD, FRCPC, MPH
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 1 JurisdictionThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, it seems to focus on people who are not on certain recommended therapies, so you might not need to stop any current treatments.

What data supports the effectiveness of this treatment for improving lung cancer screening compliance?

Research shows that educational programs for conditions like COPD can improve how well doctors follow treatment guidelines and reduce hospital visits. This suggests that similar educational interventions might help improve compliance with lung cancer screening.12345

Is the educational intervention for lung cancer screening compliance safe for humans?

The educational interventions, including those involving pharmacists and outreach for lung cancer screening, have been studied in various contexts like COPD and cardiovascular disease management. These studies focus on improving patient adherence and decision-making without reporting any safety concerns, suggesting that such educational interventions are generally safe for humans.678910

How does the education intervention for lung cancer screening compliance differ from other treatments?

This treatment is unique because it focuses on educating patients to improve their compliance with lung cancer screening, rather than using medication or traditional therapies. It involves outreach and decision counseling to encourage patients to follow screening guidelines, which is different from standard medical treatments that typically involve drugs or procedures.1391112

What is the purpose of this trial?

Does an educational intervention for untreated COPD and cardiovascular disease which is integrated in an existing lung cancer screening program improve guideline concordant medication adherence at 12 months

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for individuals who have been screened for lung cancer and found to have mild to severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) without being on recommended lipid-lowering therapy, or diagnosed with symptomatic COPD not treated with first-line therapies. It's not suitable for those already on appropriate COPD treatment, without CAC, with known heart issues, diabetes, or a high suspicion of lung cancer.

Inclusion Criteria

I have COPD, experience symptoms, and am not on first-line treatment.
You have been screened for lung cancer using a low-dose CT scan of the chest as part of a specific project in Quebec.
I have mild to severe artery plaque and am not on cholesterol-lowering medication.

Exclusion Criteria

I don't have heart calcification, known heart disease, past heart surgery, or diabetes.
I am suspected to have lung cancer with a high-risk rating.
My COPD is either symptom-free or I am on the first line of treatment.

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Educational intervention for untreated COPD and cardiovascular disease integrated in an existing lung cancer screening program

12 months
Regular visits as per intervention protocol

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after intervention

12 months
Follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months post intervention

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Educational material and treatment recommendations for patients, general practitioners and pharmacists
Trial Overview The study tests if providing educational materials and treatment recommendations can improve adherence to medication guidelines at 12 months in patients with untreated COPD and cardiovascular disease within a lung cancer screening program.
Participant Groups
4Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Intervention Arm: CVDExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Patients diagnosed with mild to severe CAC and not on first line guideline recommended therapy. CAC score obtained from lung cancer screening CT Scan images
Group II: Intervention Arm: COPDExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Patients with untreated COPD or not on first line guideline recommended therapy.
Group III: Control Arm: CVDActive Control1 Intervention
Patients diagnosed with mild to severe CAC and not on first line guideline recommended therapy. Coronary artery Calcification (CAC) score obtained from lung cancer screening CT Scan images
Group IV: Control Arm: COPDActive Control1 Intervention
Patients with untreated COPD or not on first line guideline recommended therapy.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Nicole Ezer, MD, FRCPC, MPH

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2
Recruited
430+

Findings from Research

An educational program for general practitioners (GPs) in Denmark significantly improved adherence to COPD guidelines, with the registration of key patient metrics like FEV1 increasing from 45% to 69% and FEV1 % of predicted from 30% to 56%.
The program also enhanced the management of COPD, including better recording of smoking status and dyspnea severity, and reduced inappropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids in mild COPD patients, demonstrating that targeted education can lead to better patient care.
Management of COPD in general practice in Denmark--participating in an educational program substantially improves adherence to guidelines.Ulrik, CS., Hansen, EF., Jensen, MS., et al.[2021]
An educational program for general practitioners in Sicily improved the management of COPD, as evidenced by an increase in spirometry registrations from 59.7% to 73.0% over two years, compared to a national average of 64.8%.
The program also led to a decrease in COPD-related hospitalizations from 6.9% to 4.0% and all-cause hospitalizations from 23.0% to 18.9%, indicating enhanced patient care despite some quality indicators remaining unchanged.
Improvement in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following a clinical educational program: results from a prospective cohort study in the Sicilian general practice setting.Ferrara, R., Ientile, V., Piccinni, C., et al.[2019]
A study involving 293 COPD patients showed that despite improved skills of general practitioners in COPD management, patients' self-management skills did not significantly improve over time, indicating a need for ongoing education.
Patients' information needs about COPD remained high, particularly regarding diet, exercise, and self-management, with 57% reporting unchanged or increased needs after 18 months, suggesting that tailored patient education is crucial for effective management.
Primary care patients with mild or stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease need more support in disease management: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial.Sandelowsky, H., Krakau, I., Modin, S., et al.[2023]

References

Management of COPD in general practice in Denmark--participating in an educational program substantially improves adherence to guidelines. [2021]
Improvement in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following a clinical educational program: results from a prospective cohort study in the Sicilian general practice setting. [2019]
Primary care patients with mild or stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease need more support in disease management: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial. [2023]
Quality of COPD care in hospital outpatient clinics in Denmark: The KOLIBRI study. [2009]
Self-management behaviour and support among primary care COPD patients: cross-sectional analysis of data from the Birmingham Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Cohort. [2022]
Effectiveness of a simple intervention on management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its cardiovascular comorbidities: COREPOC study. [2018]
Effectiveness of a pharmacist-driven intervention in COPD (EPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. [2023]
Effectiveness of clinical pharmacist intervention on medication adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A randomized controlled study. [2023]
Outreach to primary care patients in lung cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial. [2022]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Part 2: A Review of Pharmacotherapy Options. [2023]
Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy to improve the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a study protocol of a cluster randomized trial. [2021]
Compliance with pulmonary medication in general practice. [2013]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security