Biomarker-Driven Therapy for Breast Cancer
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial explores a new treatment approach for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that cannot be surgically removed. Researchers aim to determine if early treatment changes, based on thymidine kinase activity (TKa) blood test results, can extend the period patients remain free of disease progression while on a first-line therapy of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. Patients with low TKa after the first treatment cycle will continue their current therapy, while those with high TKa may switch treatments. Patients managing advanced breast cancer and starting this specific therapy might be suitable for the trial. As an unphased trial, this study allows patients to contribute to innovative research that could lead to new treatment strategies.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, you will need to start a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy as part of the study.
What prior data suggests that the DiviTum® TKa assay is safe for use in this trial?
Studies have shown that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with hormone therapy is generally safe for treating certain types of breast cancer. Research indicates that most patients tolerate these treatments well. Common side effects include fatigue and nausea, while serious side effects remain rare. One study confirmed that this combination is effective and safe for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This means it works for many patients and usually doesn't cause severe problems. In summary, CDK4/6 inhibitors plus hormone therapy have a strong safety record for treating similar conditions.12345
Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about this approach to breast cancer treatment because it uses a biomarker-driven strategy to tailor therapy. Unlike the standard of care, which generally involves fixed treatment regimens, this method measures Thymidine Kinase activity (TKa) to determine the best course of action. This allows patients with suppressed TKa levels to potentially extend the time between scans, reducing the burden of frequent imaging. Additionally, for patients whose TKa levels are unsuppressed, the protocol supports early switching to alternative therapies, which could lead to more personalized and effective treatment plans. This biomarker-driven approach represents a promising step forward in making breast cancer treatment more precise and adaptable.
What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for breast cancer?
Research has shown that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with hormone therapy can effectively treat HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. One study found that using these drugs as the first treatment helped some patients live for more than four years. Notably, patients taking abemaciclib experienced fewer side effects, such as infections, making the treatment easier to handle. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy, with participants monitored using the DiviTum® TKa assay to assess treatment response. This drug combination works by slowing cancer growth by targeting specific proteins that help cancer cells multiply.678910
Who Is on the Research Team?
Katherine Clifton, MD
Principal Investigator
Washington University School of Medicine
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for post-menopausal women with HR+ HER2- metastatic or unresectable breast cancer. They must be at least 18, have a performance status ≤ 2, and can't have had chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Prior therapy for early-stage breast cancer is okay if it was over a year ago.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants receive first-line treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. TKa levels are monitored at baseline and C1D15 to determine treatment adjustments.
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, with progression-free survival and overall survival being assessed.
Extension
Participants with suppressed TKa levels may delay restaging scans from 24 weeks to 36 weeks and continue monitoring every 3 months.
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- CDK4/6 + Endocrine therapy
- DiviTum® TKa assay
Trial Overview
The study tests whether changing treatments based on TKa levels from the DiviTum® assay leads to longer progression-free survival in patients using CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy as first-line treatment.
How Is the Trial Designed?
3
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
* Study visits will occur at Baseline, Week 2 (C1D15), C2D1, C4D1, and clinical progression. Blood serum samples will be collected and analyzed using DiviTum® TKa at each of these dictated time points. * Patients with lack of TKa suppression at C1D15 (defined as \>145 DuA) will be recommended to switch to an alternative therapy after compliance with the medication is ensured (by pill count) and potential drug-drug interactions are reviewed. These patients will have TKa samples drawn at initiation of second-line therapy and on the first day of subsequent cycles until progression.
* Study visits will occur at Baseline, Week 2 (C1D15), C2D1, C4D1, and clinical progression. Blood serum samples will be collected and analyzed using DiviTum® TKa at each of these dictated time points. * Patients with suppressed TKa levels at C1D15 will continue on CDK4/6i + endocrine therapy until clinical progression. There will be an option to elongate the time between restaging scans from Q3M to Q6M if TKa remains suppressed in this group. Physicians may repeat TKa in 2 weeks if TKa rise is noted and if TKa again becomes suppressed, may delay imaging. These patients will undergo TKa level monitoring at C2D1, C4D1, every 3 months thereafter, and at the time of clinical progression. The feasibility endpoint relates specifically to the Week 24 imaging time point.
-Physicians will be asked to complete surveys as follows: * Physician Survey 1 for patients in the TKa C1D15 Suppressed group who have the option to delay the Week 24 scan at Week 24 * Physician Survey 2 for patients in the TKa C1D15 Unsuppressed group at C1D15 (after TKa results have returned but before switching therapy)
CDK4/6 + Endocrine therapy is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada, Japan for the following indications:
- Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer
- Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer
- Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer
- Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor
Biovica
Collaborator
Published Research Related to This Trial
Citations
Comparative overall survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus an ...
Several real-world studies compared CDK4/6i effectiveness, with inconsistent findings. This study compared overall survival (OS) of patients ...
Real-world progression-free survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors ...
We observed no statistically significant differences in rwPFS in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ...
Real-world effectiveness of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in estrogen ...
First-line median OS was 37.8 months (95% CI: 32.5–NA); 49.7 months (95% CI: 44.7–54.1); and 54.4 months (95% CI: 47.9–NA) for abemaciclib, ...
results from the multicenter PALMARES-2 study
The three CDK4/6is have different pharmacology and safety, but no large effectiveness comparisons have been conducted so far.
Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Propensity-Matched ...
Abemaciclib's significantly lower incidence of neutropenia (15.6% vs 32.2%) and severe infections (15.7% vs 25.1%) likely enabled more ...
An Overview of the Safety Profile and Clinical Impact of CDK4 ...
This review provides the latest summary and update on the safety profile of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors, as it appears from all major phase II and III ...
Safety profile of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 ...
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety profile of combining CDK4-6i with palliative and ablative RT in both the metastatic and ...
UK multicentre real-world data of the use of cyclin ...
These data demonstrate that CDK4/6is are an effective and safe treatment for metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer.
Efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-positive ...
CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with anti-HER2 therapies showed moderate efficacy in HER2+ breast cancer, offering disease control in most patients, slowing tumor ...
Clinician's guide: expert insights on the use of CDK4/6 ...
This paper explores the integration of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors into clinical practice, focusing on disease-free survival and safety outcomes.
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.