196 Participants Needed

SAFE Technique for Erectile Dysfunction

NT
MF
Overseen ByMonali Fatterpekar, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Male
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) has become the standard of care in the management of localized prostate cancer. However, post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence still pose a challenge that adversely affects the patient's quality of life. Hydrodissection (HD) was introduced in 1987 in the medical field and it was tested for the first time during a retropubic radical prostatectomy back in 2005. Since then, research has indicated an improvement in erectile function results, presumably because of a less traumatic neural dissection and a decreased risk of neuropraxia. In an effort to achieve a balance between oncological excision and functional preservation, prostate surgery is evolving to incorporate intraoperative real-time evaluation of extracapsular extension. Recently, a micro-ultrasound operating at 29 MHz has been introduced. It provides a resolution down to 70 μ to assess the glandular pattern and cellular density of the prostatic tissue. Given the experience in more than a thousand cases with this technology, and the growing literature showing promising results in the detection and staging of prostate cancer; the researchers decided to implement this tool as guidance for hydrodissection of the layers of the lateral prostatic fascia. Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy and SAFE (Saline assisted fascial engorgement) nerve preservation guided by Microultrasound (MUS) is a prospective randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the impact of normal saline solution hydrodissection (HD) on erectile function outcomes after RALP. This innovative approach consists of a transrectal ultrasound-guided HD using a high-resolution Microultrasound (MUS) (ExactVu micro-ultrasound, Exact Imaging, Markham, Canada). The technique will be applied to those patients who undergo grade 1, 2, or 3 NS approach taking into account the grading system proposed by Tewari et al. The hypothesis is that the SAFE technique could minimize the risk of a traumatic neurovascular bundle dissection while assessing the prostatic capsule integrity with a high-resolution MUS. The researchers also hypothesize that the use of SAFE along with RALP will optimize the post-surgery recovery of erectile function.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are on androgen deprivation therapy or if PDE5 inhibitors are not safe for you, you cannot participate in the trial.

What data supports the effectiveness of the SAFE Technique for Erectile Dysfunction treatment?

The research indicates that while robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) offers some benefits in surgical precision and recovery, erectile dysfunction remains a common issue post-surgery. Modified surgical techniques and nerve-sparing approaches have shown some promise in improving erectile function, but the effectiveness of the SAFE technique specifically is not directly supported by the provided data.12345

Is the SAFE Technique for Erectile Dysfunction safe for humans?

The research on robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) suggests it is generally safe, with benefits like decreased surgical complications and faster recovery. However, erectile dysfunction remains a common issue post-surgery, and while treatments like PDE5 inhibitors are used, their long-term benefits are uncertain.12367

How does the SAFE Technique for Erectile Dysfunction differ from other treatments?

The SAFE Technique involves robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), which is a surgical method that offers improved precision and potentially better potency rates compared to traditional open surgery. However, erectile dysfunction remains a common issue post-surgery, and while nerve-sparing techniques can help, many patients still require additional treatments like penile prosthesis or medications.12358

Research Team

AK

Ashutosh Kumar Tewari, MBBS, MCh, FRCS (Hon.)

Principal Investigator

Study Principal Investigator

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for men with localized prostate cancer who are undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP). It aims to improve post-surgery erectile function and urinary continence. Specific details on inclusion or exclusion criteria were not provided.

Inclusion Criteria

Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent
I am over 18 years old.
I am a man with normal sexual function undergoing a specific prostate surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

I am a candidate for a repeat prostate surgery.
I am currently on hormone therapy for cancer.
I cannot take PDE5 inhibitors due to health reasons.

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) with or without the SAFE technique

1 day (surgery)
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for erectile function recovery and other health outcomes

24 months
Multiple visits at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP)
  • SAFE (Saline assisted fascial engorgement)
Trial Overview The trial tests the SAFE technique, which uses saline during surgery to protect nerves, guided by high-resolution micro-ultrasound. The goal is to reduce trauma during nerve dissection and enhance recovery of erectile function after RALP.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: RALP with SAFE TechniqueExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Erectile function recovery will be evaluated for patients receiving Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) + SAFE (Saline assisted fascial engorgement).
Group II: RALP without SAFE TechniqueActive Control1 Intervention
Erectile function recovery will be evaluated for patients receiving Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) without SAFE (Saline assisted fascial engorgement).

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Lead Sponsor

Trials
933
Recruited
579,000+

Findings from Research

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) demonstrated high safety with no conversions to open surgery or re-operations in the first 100 cases studied, with an average blood loss of only 281 ml and a short hospital stay of 1.1 nights.
Efficacy results showed an 18% positive margin rate overall, with only 8% for pT2 tumors, and 68% of patients reported no incontinence at 12 months, indicating RALP is effective in managing prostate cancer with favorable postoperative outcomes.
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a 2010 update.Duthie, JB., Pickford, JE., Gilling, PJ.[2011]

References

Intra-abdominal reservoir placement during penile prosthesis surgery in post-robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy patients: a case report and practical considerations. [2011]
Erectile dysfunction in robotic radical prostatectomy: Outcomes and management. [2022]
Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil 5 mg Once Daily for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A 2-Year Follow-Up. [2023]
Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial. [2021]
Nerve sparing can preserve orgasmic function in most men after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. [2012]
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a 2010 update. [2011]
Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. [2022]
Ability to Reach Orgasm in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. [2017]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security