12500 Participants Needed

Work Requirements for Food Security

TJ
AM
Overseen ByAdrianna McIntyre, PhD
Age: 18 - 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Harvard Medical School
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

More than a dozen states have proposed or plan to implement work requirements in Medicaid, and similar requirements already exist nationally in the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), yet evidence on the effects of these policies is limited. In cooperation with the state of Virginia, the investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial studying the impacts of work requirements in public programs on insurance coverage, SNAP participation, employment, and health, with a particular focus on changes in racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in these outcomes. The COVID-19 epidemic and concurrent economic downturn creates additional urgency around these issues, and the investigators will use a combination of national administrative data and a new population survey to assess disparities in employment, health care, and food insecurity during this crisis.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment 'Work requirement exemption months' for food security?

The study on food incentives for tuberculosis patients in Russia shows that providing food can significantly improve adherence to treatment among socially marginalized groups, suggesting that similar approaches could enhance food security by ensuring consistent access to food.12345

How does the treatment 'Work Requirements for Food Security' differ from other treatments for food insecurity?

The 'Work Requirements for Food Security' treatment is unique because it involves implementing work requirements for participation in food assistance programs like SNAP, which can lead to reduced participation and benefits. Unlike other treatments that might focus on direct food provision or financial assistance, this approach ties eligibility to employment, potentially impacting access to food and health resources.678910

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for Virginia residents aged 18-49 who can work and don't have dependents, making them subject to SNAP's work requirements. It aims to understand how these rules affect health insurance coverage, job status, and food security.

Inclusion Criteria

I am between 18-49 years old and qualify for Virginia's SNAP as an able-bodied adult without dependents.

Exclusion Criteria

Categorical exemption from work requirements for any reason (e.g., has a disability, has dependents, resides in a geographic area where work requirements have been waived due to elevated employment)

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Participants are assigned to different intervention groups with varying work requirement exemptions and recertification periods

12-24 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for outcomes such as SNAP enrollment, employment status, and health metrics

24 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Work requirement exemption months
Trial OverviewThe study examines the impact of giving some people extra months without SNAP work requirements. Researchers will see if this changes employment rates, health inequalities, or access to food during economic downturns like the COVID-19 crisis.
Participant Groups
5Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Control GroupActive Control1 Intervention
No change to work requirements or recertification period
Group II: Intervention Group 1Active Control1 Intervention
Standard 6-month recertification period, additional 6-month work requirement exemption
Group III: Intervention Group 2Active Control1 Intervention
Standard 6-month recertification period, additional 12-month work requirement exemption
Group IV: Intervention Group 3Active Control1 Intervention
Standard 6-month recertification period, additional 12-month work requirement exemption
Group V: Intervention Group 4Active Control1 Intervention
12-month recertification period (6-month extension), additional 6-month work requirement exemption

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Harvard Medical School

Lead Sponsor

Trials
30
Recruited
40,700+

Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Lead Sponsor

Trials
208
Recruited
1,421,000+

Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab

Collaborator

Trials
31
Recruited
273,000+

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Collaborator

Trials
473
Recruited
1,374,000+

Findings from Research

Implementing a co-designed mealtime assistance process in a 31-bed ward led to a significant reduction in wasted meals from an average of 3 per day to 0, which also decreased food waste by 0.43 kg per patient daily.
Patients who received mealtime assistance showed no new incidences of aspiration pneumonia or swallowing difficulties, indicating that the intervention not only improved meal access but also enhanced patient safety and nutritional outcomes.
Reducing risk of development or exacerbation of nutritional deficits by optimizing patient access to mealtime assistance.Teeling, SP., Coetzee, H., Phillips, M., et al.[2020]
The project developed clinical indicators for nutrition interventions in high-risk patients across oncology, cardiovascular, and surgical settings, emphasizing timely nutrition support within specific timeframes after admission.
Key recommendations include ensuring no patient is on a clear-liquid diet without nutrition support for more than 5-7 days, and that patients at moderate or high risk receive proper nutrition assessments and care plans within 72 hours of admission.
Clinical indicators for oncology, cardiovascular, and surgical patients: report of the ADA Council on Practice Quality Assurance Committee.Queen, PM., Caldwell, M., Balogun, L.[2019]
A performance improvement process in a 28-bed ICU led to better patient outcomes by increasing the use of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition and starting nutrition support sooner.
The implementation of educational programs and a systematic approach resulted in meeting patients' protein and energy needs, ultimately enhancing nutrition support practices and achieving cost savings for the community hospital.
Enhanced enteral and parenteral nutrition practice and outcomes in an intensive care unit with a hospital-wide performance improvement process.Schwartz, DB.[2019]

References

Reducing risk of development or exacerbation of nutritional deficits by optimizing patient access to mealtime assistance. [2020]
Clinical indicators for oncology, cardiovascular, and surgical patients: report of the ADA Council on Practice Quality Assurance Committee. [2019]
Enhanced enteral and parenteral nutrition practice and outcomes in an intensive care unit with a hospital-wide performance improvement process. [2019]
Food incentives improve adherence to tuberculosis drug treatment among homeless patients in Russia. [2022]
Mandatory guidelines aim to raise quality of meals in hospital. [2019]
Welfare reform and older immigrants: food stamp program participation and food insecurity. [2019]
Food stamp program; recertification of SSI households--Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. Final rule. [2000]
Association of Work Requirements With Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation by Race/Ethnicity and Disability Status, 2013-2017. [2022]
The Impact of Waivers on Summer Meal Participation in Maryland. [2022]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Effects of SNAP Work Requirements in Reducing Participation and Benefits From 2013 to 2017. [2021]