94 Participants Needed

ERAS Anesthesia Techniques for Knee Surgery Recovery

(EKAT-TeleTPS Trial)

GB
Overseen ByGeorge Birch, BS
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

A comparison of two anesthetic techniques for total knee replacements: (1) Peri-Articular Injection (PAI), local infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee block (IPACK) and single-shot adductor canal block (ACB) vs. (2) PAI, IPACK and continuous adductor canal block catheter (ACC).

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but it excludes people who regularly use gabapentin or pregabalin. It's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Adductor Canal Block (ACB) for knee surgery recovery?

Research shows that Adductor Canal Block (ACB) is effective in reducing pain after knee surgeries, such as total knee arthroplasty, by providing good pain control without affecting muscle strength. It has been found to reduce the need for additional pain medication like morphine in the first 24 hours after surgery.12345

Is the adductor canal block (ACB) safe for use in knee surgery recovery?

The adductor canal block (ACB) is considered safe for use in knee surgery, as it is a preferred method of pain relief in total knee arthroplasty (knee replacement surgery). However, it requires careful administration by a trained team to ensure safety.678910

How is the treatment Adductor Canal block with sham catheter, Continuous Adductor Canal Catheter (ACC) different from other treatments for knee surgery recovery?

The Continuous Adductor Canal Catheter (ACC) is unique because it provides continuous pain relief while allowing better mobility compared to other methods like epidural analgesia, which can cause more leg weakness. This technique focuses on blocking specific nerves in the adductor canal, minimizing muscle weakness and improving recovery after knee surgery.34111213

Research Team

DK

David Kim, MD

Principal Investigator

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for English-speaking adults aged 18-65 with osteoarthritis, scheduled for knee replacement surgery using regional anesthesia. They must live within an hour of the hospital, be able to follow the study protocol, have a smartphone, and have home caregivers if needed. Excluded are those with diabetes, chronic pain or high pain catastrophizing scores, severe knee deformities, no home caregivers for catheter care, ASA status III/IV patients, those unable to manage a catheter at home or going to rehab facilities post-surgery.

Inclusion Criteria

Has a smart phone
Patients with osteoarthritis scheduled for a primary total knee arthroplasty with a participating surgeon
You are scheduled to receive regional anesthesia during the study.
See 3 more

Exclusion Criteria

You have a severe bending or twisting problem in your joints.
Patients undergoing general anesthesia
Diabetes
See 11 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo total knee arthroplasty with either a continuous adductor canal catheter or a single-shot adductor canal block

1 day
1 visit (in-person, day of surgery)

Post-operative Monitoring

Participants' opioid consumption is monitored during the post-anesthesia care unit stay and the 24-48 hour period post spinal induction

2 days
In-patient monitoring

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Adductor Canal block with sham catheter
  • Continuous Adductor Canal Catheter (ACC)
Trial Overview The trial compares two anesthesia techniques in knee replacements: one uses a single-shot nerve block plus local injections (PAI & IPACK), while the other adds a continuous nerve block through a catheter (ACC). The goal is to see which method provides better pain control during recovery.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Placebo Group
Group I: Continuous Adductor Canal Catheter (ACC)Active Control1 Intervention
Patients will receive a combined spinal epidural, PAI, IPACK, and a continuous adductor canal catheter
Group II: Adductor Canal block with sham catheterPlacebo Group1 Intervention
Patients will receive a combined spinal epidural, PAI, IPACK, and an adductor canal block. The patient will also receive a sham catheter.

Adductor Canal block with sham catheter is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada for the following indications:

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί
Approved in European Union as Adductor Canal Block for:
  • Postoperative pain management for knee surgery
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Approved in United States as Adductor Canal Block for:
  • Postoperative pain management for knee surgery
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
Approved in Canada as Adductor Canal Block for:
  • Postoperative pain management for knee surgery

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Lead Sponsor

Trials
257
Recruited
61,800+

Findings from Research

In a study of 120 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, the combination of adductor canal block (ACB) and interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of posterior knee block (IPACK) provided significantly better pain relief compared to ACB alone, as measured by VAS scores.
Patients receiving the ACB+IPACK technique also demonstrated improved range of motion and ambulation distance post-surgery, indicating that this method enhances recovery without compromising motor function.
Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period.Sankineani, SR., Reddy, ARC., Eachempati, KK., et al.[2022]
In a study of 70 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgeries under spinal anesthesia, those who received an adductor canal block (ACB) experienced significantly lower morphine consumption (8.63 mg) compared to those who did not receive the block (21.91 mg), indicating ACB's effectiveness in pain management.
The ACB not only prolonged the duration of analgesia (approximately 366 minutes vs. 150 minutes) but also resulted in lower pain scores during rest and knee flexion, while maintaining better hemodynamic stability and showing no complications.
Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block With 20 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgeries-A Randomized Control Trial.Arumugam, P., Ravi, S., Ln, S., et al.[2023]
In a study of 57 total knee arthroplasty patients, both proximal and distal adductor canal blocks (ACBs) provided similar levels of postoperative pain relief, as indicated by comparable opioid consumption and pain scores.
While the proximal ACB group showed a trend towards better functional mobility (measured by the 'Up and Go' test), this difference was not statistically significant, suggesting that both techniques are equally effective for pain management post-surgery.
A Randomized Comparison of Pain Control and Functional Mobility between Proximal and Distal Adductor Canal Blocks for Total Knee Replacement.Romano, C., Lloyd, A., Nair, S., et al.[2022]

References

Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. [2022]
2.China (Republic : 1949- )pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block With 20 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgeries-A Randomized Control Trial. [2023]
A Randomized Comparison of Pain Control and Functional Mobility between Proximal and Distal Adductor Canal Blocks for Total Knee Replacement. [2022]
A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial of Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Single Injection Versus Catheter Technique. [2022]
A randomised controlled trial comparing adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for knee arthroplasty. [2020]
The feasibility of direct adductor canal block (DACB) as a part of periarticular injection in total knee arthroplasty. [2020]
Anatomic endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patella tendon autograft. [2022]
Femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle, remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a posterior trans-septal portal. [2019]
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Preservation: The Single-Anteromedial Bundle Biological Augmentation (SAMBBA) Technique. [2022]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Evaluating the Accuracy of Tibial Tunnel Placement After Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. [2020]
Evaluation of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with two different concentration of bupivacaine in arthroscopic knee surgery: A feasibility study. [2022]
12.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Adductor Canal Block With Bupivacaine Liposome Versus Ropivacaine Pain Ball for Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study. [2022]
13.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks Provide Superior Ambulation and Pain Control Compared to Epidural Analgesia for Primary Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. [2022]