20 Participants Needed

TMS for Stroke Recovery

Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 1
Sponsor: University of Texas at Austin
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 2 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions could feasibly strengthen residual corticospinal tract (CST) connections and promote poststroke hand motor recovery. To maximize the effects of such interventions, they must be delivered during brain activity patterns during which TMS best activates the residual CST and enhances its neural transmission. This approach is termed brain state-dependent TMS. The investigators have recently developed a machine learning framework that identifies personalized brain activity patterns reflecting strong CST activation in neurotypical adults. In this study, the investigators will apply this framework to the poststroke brain for the first time. They will also evaluate relationships between this framework's ability to detect strong and weak CST activation states and measures of CST pathway integrity. Participants will visit the laboratory for two days of testing that are separated by at least one night of sleep. On Day 1, participants will provide their informed consent. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool and the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test will be used to evaluate consent capacity and confirm the presence of expressive aphasia as needed. Afterwards, participants will complete eligibility screening and clinical assessment of upper extremity motor impairment, motor function, and disability using the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment, the Wolf Motor Function Test, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Participants will then be screened for the presence of residual CST connections from the lesioned hemisphere to the affected first dorsal interosseous muscle. Recording electrodes will be attached to this muscle in order to record TMS-evoked twitches in these muscles. During this procedure, single-pulse TMS will be applied to each point of a 1 cm resolution grid covering primary and secondary motor areas of the lesioned hemisphere at maximum stimulator output. If TMS reliably elicits a muscle twitch in the affected first dorsal interosseous, that participant will be considered to have residual CST connections and will be eligible for the full study. If no muscle twitch is observed, the participant will not be eligible for the full study. Afterwards, recording electrodes will be removed and the participant will leave the laboratory. On Day 2, participants will return to the laboratory. The investigators will confirm continued eligibility and place recording electrodes on the scalp using a swim-type cap. The investigators will also place recording electrodes on the affected first dorsal interosseous as well as the affected abductor pollicis brevis and extensor digitorum communis muscles. After identifying the scalp location at which TMS best elicits muscle twitches in the affected first dorsal interosseous muscle, the investigators will determine the lowest possible TMS intensity that such evokes muscle twitches at least half of the time. Then, the investigators will deliver 6 blocks of 100 single TMS pulses while participants rest quietly with their eyes open. Stimulation will be delivered at an intensity that is 20% greater than the lowest possible TMS intensity that evokes muscle twitches at least half the time. Afterwards, all electrodes will be removed, participation will be complete, and participants will leave the laboratory. The investigators will recruit a total of 20 chronic stroke survivors for this study.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but it mentions that any recent changes to medication use within the last month may affect eligibility. It's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment TMS for stroke recovery?

Research shows that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including repetitive TMS (rTMS) and theta burst stimulation (TBS), can help improve motor recovery and upper-limb function in stroke patients by modulating brain activity.12345

Is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) safe for humans?

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), including its variations like repetitive TMS (rTMS) and theta burst stimulation (TBS), is generally considered safe for humans, with most adverse events being mild. However, there is a small risk of seizures, especially with TBS, so it should be used with caution and under professional supervision.46789

How is the treatment TMS for stroke recovery different from other treatments?

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is unique because it uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain, which can help improve motor function after a stroke. Unlike traditional physical therapies, TMS directly targets brain activity to enhance recovery.1241011

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for chronic stroke survivors who still have some connection between their brain and hand muscles, as shown by muscle twitches in response to TMS. They must be able to give informed consent, which may involve passing tests if they have speech difficulties due to the stroke.

Inclusion Criteria

Ability to provide informed consent
Discernable and reliable motor-evoked potential (MEP) following single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to the lesioned hemisphere
I have weakness in one of my arms.
See 4 more

Exclusion Criteria

My arm movement score is 66.
Mini Mental State Exam score <= 24
I have a history of neurological conditions, but not stroke.
See 2 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Initial Testing

Participants undergo initial testing including informed consent, eligibility screening, and clinical assessment of motor impairment

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

TMS Intervention

Participants receive TMS intervention to identify brain activity patterns and determine TMS intensity for muscle twitch elicitation

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after intervention

2 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Trial Overview The study is testing a personalized approach using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on post-stroke patients. It aims to find specific brain activity patterns that make TMS more effective at activating residual connections in the brain that control hand movement.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
Approved in United States as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for:
  • Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
  • Migraine Headache Symptoms
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ
Approved in European Union as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for:
  • Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Texas at Austin

Lead Sponsor

Trials
387
Recruited
86,100+

Emory University

Collaborator

Trials
1,735
Recruited
2,605,000+

Findings from Research

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and theta burst stimulation (TBS) have been shown to effectively modulate cortical excitability in stroke patients, with low frequency rTMS decreasing resting motor thresholds and increasing motor-evoked potentials in the affected brain area.
High frequency rTMS and intermittent TBS specifically enhance cortical excitability in the affected motor area, suggesting these protocols can aid in motor recovery after a stroke, while the effects of continuous TBS remain unclear.
Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bai, Z., Zhang, J., Fong, KNK.[2022]
In a study involving 10 patients with chronic stroke, intermittent theta burst stimulation (TBS) of the affected motor cortex improved grip-lift performance, while sham stimulation led to a decline in function.
Continuous TBS of the unaffected motor cortex resulted in decreased upper-limb function, suggesting that the contralesional hemisphere may hinder recovery after a stroke.
Combining theta burst stimulation with training after subcortical stroke.Ackerley, SJ., Stinear, CM., Barber, PA., et al.[2022]
In a study involving 20 chronic ischemic stroke patients, both continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with physical therapy showed significant improvements in motor function and daily living activities after 10 treatment sessions.
While both real cTBS and rTMS were effective, only rTMS significantly reduced spasticity in multiple muscle groups, indicating that while these interventions help with functional recovery, their impact on spasticity may be limited.
The Effect of Sham Controlled Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation and Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Extremity Spasticity and Functional Recovery in Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients.Kuzu, ร–., Adiguzel, E., Kesikburun, S., et al.[2021]

References

Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [2022]
Combining theta burst stimulation with training after subcortical stroke. [2022]
The Effect of Sham Controlled Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation and Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Extremity Spasticity and Functional Recovery in Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients. [2021]
Safety of carotid artery stent in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-The histopathological proof from swine carotid artery. [2018]
Effectiveness of central plus peripheral stimulation (CPPS) on post stroke upper limb motor rehabilitation. [2018]
Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects. [2020]
Safety Review for Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. [2023]
Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature. [2022]
[Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke: a meta analysis]. [2018]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Informing dose-finding studies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor function: a qualitative systematic review. [2018]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Safety and behavioral effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke. [2018]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of ServiceยทPrivacy PolicyยทCookiesยทSecurity