36 Participants Needed

Treosulfan for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recruiting at 2 trial locations
UE
CT
Overseen ByClinical Trial Information
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 1
Sponsor: medac GmbH
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug Treosulfan for treating Acute Myeloid Leukemia?

Research shows that a combination of Treosulfan and Fludarabine is effective for patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, with a 2-year relapse-free survival rate of 58% and a low non-relapse mortality rate. This combination is well-tolerated and provides encouraging survival and disease control.12345

Is Treosulfan safe for use in humans?

Treosulfan, when used in combination with fludarabine, has been shown to have fewer serious side effects compared to other similar treatments and is considered a reduced-toxicity regimen for patients not eligible for conventional transplants. Studies indicate that it has acceptable toxicity levels, with limited nonhematological (not related to blood) side effects, making it a viable option for high-risk patients.23678

How is the drug Treosulfan for Acute Myeloid Leukemia different from other treatments?

Treosulfan, when combined with fludarabine, offers a unique conditioning regimen for stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, providing effective antileukemia activity with reduced toxicity compared to traditional myeloablative treatments. This combination is particularly beneficial for patients not eligible for standard myeloablation, as it maintains a good safety profile while achieving full donor chimerism in most cases.12379

What is the purpose of this trial?

This study aim is to assess, if treosulfan pharmacokinetics are influenced by declined renal function and by race/ethnicity of patients. The study also aims to determine an appropriate safe dose of treosulfan, when patient's renal function is impaired. The participants of this study are undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Research Team

UE

Ute Eckenbach

Principal Investigator

SyntheractHCR

Eligibility Criteria

Adults aged 18-80 with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome, eligible for stem cell transplant and treosulfan treatment. Must have a compatible donor, adequate kidney function (creatinine clearance >=30 mL/min), and agree to use effective birth control. Excludes pregnant women.

Inclusion Criteria

I have a donor who matches me closely for a transplant.
I have AML or MDS and am eligible for a specific transplant prep treatment.
Participants must have a negative pregnancy test
See 4 more

Exclusion Criteria

My cancer has spread to my brain or spinal cord.
I cannot have a stem cell transplant soon due to a severe illness.
I have had more than one bone marrow transplant from a donor.
See 13 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive treosulfan and fludarabine before undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

7 days
Daily visits for drug administration

Engraftment Monitoring

Participants are monitored for engraftment success and adverse events

28 days
Regular visits for blood tests and monitoring

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Fludarabine
  • Treosulfan
Trial Overview The study is testing how kidney function and race/ethnicity affect the body's handling of Treosulfan in patients receiving it as part of their conditioning regimen before stem cell transplantation for certain blood disorders.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Treosulfan and FludarabineExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Participants will receive treosulfan 10 gram per square meter (g/m\^2), intravenous (IV) infusion, given over 2 hours once daily on three consecutive days (day -4 to day -2), followed by fludarabine, 30 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion once daily on 5 consecutive days (days -6 to -2), preceding allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) on Day 0.

Fludarabine is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada for the following indications:

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί
Approved in European Union as Fludara for:
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Mantle-cell lymphoma
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Approved in United States as Fludara for:
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • Stem Cell Transplant Conditioning
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
Approved in Canada as Fludara for:
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

medac GmbH

Lead Sponsor

Trials
40
Recruited
9,300+

Synteract, Inc.

Industry Sponsor

Trials
21
Recruited
5,900+

Findings from Research

In a study of 60 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the combination of treosulfan and fludarabine for conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation was well tolerated, with a low nonrelapse mortality (NRM) of 5% at 100 days and 8% at 2 years.
The 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 58% overall, and 88% for patients without high-risk cytogenetics, indicating that this regimen may provide effective disease control, particularly in lower-risk patients.
Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for high-risk hematologic malignancies.Nemecek, ER., Guthrie, KA., Sorror, ML., et al.[2021]
The fludarabine and treosulfan regimen was tested in 24 patients with AML and MDS, showing a 60% two-year disease-free survival rate and a low relapse rate of 15%, indicating effective antileukemia activity.
The treatment demonstrated relatively limited extramedullary toxicity and manageable rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), suggesting it is a safer alternative for patients not eligible for standard myeloablation.
Fludarabine and treosulfan: a novel modified myeloablative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with effective antileukemia activity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.Shimoni, A., Hardan, I., Shem-Tov, N., et al.[2019]
A novel conditioning regimen using Treosulfan, Fludarabine, and Cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) was found to be effective and tolerable for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), with a median follow-up of 3.2 years.
The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 37.6%, and overall survival was 45.4%, indicating that this treatment approach can provide significant benefits even in patients with advanced disease states.
Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms.O'Hagan Henderson, S., Frietsch, JJ., Hilgendorf, I., et al.[2022]

References

Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for high-risk hematologic malignancies. [2021]
Fludarabine and treosulfan: a novel modified myeloablative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with effective antileukemia activity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. [2019]
Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms. [2022]
Augmented FLAMSA-Bu versus FluBu2 reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with active relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: an EBMT analysis. [2022]
Survival Advantage and Comparable Toxicity in Reduced-Toxicity Treosulfan-Based versus Reduced-Intensity Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. [2018]
Comparative study of treosulfan plus Fludarabine (FT14) with busulfan plus Fludarabine (FB4) for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission: An analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP). [2022]
Determination of Treosulfan and Fludarabine in Plasma by Turbulent Flow Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (TFLC-MS/MS). [2023]
Treosulfan/fludarabine as an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning regimen for high-risk patients. [2016]
Treosulfan in combination with fludarabine as part of conditioning treatment prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. [2020]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of ServiceΒ·Privacy PolicyΒ·CookiesΒ·Security