56 Participants Needed

Antibiotics for Premature Rupture of Membranes

MB
Overseen ByMarissa Berry, MD
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

To conduct an unblinded pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) "Improvement of PPROM Management with Prophylactic Antimicrobial Therapy (iPROMPT)" of a seven-day course of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole versus the current standard of care of a seven-day course of ampicillin/amoxicillin and azithromycin or erythromycin to prolong pregnancy and decrease adverse perinatal outcomes among hospitalized pregnant individuals undergoing expectant management of PPROM \<34 weeks.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are on antibiotics, you may need to stop if you've had more than one dose, as this is part of the exclusion criteria.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug combination Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole for treating premature rupture of membranes?

Research shows that a combination of Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole is effective in treating perforated appendicitis, suggesting it could be beneficial for other infections due to its broad-spectrum antibacterial activity.12345

Is the use of antibiotics for premature rupture of membranes generally safe for humans?

Research shows that antibiotics like ampicillin, erythromycin, and cefazolin are commonly used for premature rupture of membranes and are generally considered safe, as they help prevent infections without significant increases in fetal or maternal blood levels.678910

How does the drug combination of Ceftriaxone, Clarithromycin, and Metronidazole for premature rupture of membranes differ from other treatments?

This drug combination is unique because it combines three antibiotics, each with different mechanisms of action, to potentially address a broad range of bacterial infections that could occur with premature rupture of membranes, whereas other treatments might not use this specific combination or target such a wide spectrum of bacteria.411121314

Research Team

MB

Marissa Berry, MD

Principal Investigator

Ohio State University

KK

Kartik K Venkatesh, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

Ohio State University

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for hospitalized pregnant individuals with PPROM (preterm premature rupture of membranes) who are less than 34 weeks into their pregnancy. The goal is to see if a new combination of antibiotics can help prolong pregnancy and improve outcomes.

Inclusion Criteria

Gestational age between 23 0/7 and 32 6/7 weeks
I am hospitalized for the management of water breaking early in pregnancy.

Exclusion Criteria

Maternal immunosuppression
Allergy or contraindication to an antibiotic in either arm
I am currently being treated for an infection with antibiotics.
See 1 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1-2 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive a seven-day course of either the standard antibiotic regimen or the experimental regimen to manage PPROM

1 week

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including monitoring for endometritis, surgical site infection, and neonatal outcomes

6 weeks postpartum

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Ceftriaxone
  • Clarithromycin
  • Metronidazole
Trial Overview The study compares two antibiotic regimens for managing PPROM: one group receives ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole for seven days; the other follows standard care with ampicillin/amoxicillin plus azithromycin or erythromycin.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Standard of careExperimental Treatment4 Interventions
Participants randomized to the standard care group will receive the following regimen: * Ampicillin 2 g IV q 6 hours x 48 hours followed by amoxicillin 250 mg q 8 hours for an additional 5 days * Azithromycin 1 g PO x 1 dose OR erythromycin 250 mg IV q 6 hours x 48 hours followed by erythromycin 333 mg PO TID for an additional 5 days
Group II: Intervention groupExperimental Treatment3 Interventions
Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive the following regimen: * Ceftriaxone 1 g IV q 24 hours x 7 days * Clarithromycin 500 mg PO BID x 7 days * Metronidazole 500 mg PO q 12 hours x 7 days

Ceftriaxone is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada for the following indications:

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί
Approved in European Union as Rocephin for:
  • Sepsis
  • Bacterial infections
  • Meningitis
  • Gonorrhea
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Approved in United States as Rocephin for:
  • Sepsis
  • Bacterial infections
  • Meningitis
  • Gonorrhea
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Lower respiratory tract infections
  • Skin and skin structure infections
  • Urinary tract infections
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
Approved in Canada as Rocephin for:
  • Sepsis
  • Bacterial infections
  • Meningitis
  • Gonorrhea
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Lower respiratory tract infections
  • Skin and skin structure infections
  • Urinary tract infections

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Ohio State University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
891
Recruited
2,659,000+

Findings from Research

A new 2-drug regimen of ceftriaxone and Flagyl for treating children with perforated appendicitis allows for once-a-day dosing, leading to lower maximum temperatures post-surgery compared to the traditional 3-drug regimen.
This simpler regimen not only reduces the length of hospital stays (6.8 days vs. 7.8 days) but also significantly lowers medication costs, saving patients over $1,186 for a 5-day treatment period without compromising efficacy.
A simple and more cost-effective antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis.St Peter, SD., Little, DC., Calkins, CM., et al.[2013]
Group B streptococci and Listeria monocytogenes are the main bacteria causing early-onset infections in neonates, while coagulase-negative staphylococci are common in late-onset infections, especially in high-risk infants.
Empirical treatment for early-onset infections typically involves a combination of ampicillin and an aminoglycoside, while late-onset infections may be treated with oxacillin and an aminoglycoside, with adjustments based on local bacterial patterns and microbiological results.
Antibiotics in neonatal infections: a review.Fanos, V., Dall'Agnola, A.[2018]
A review of various antibiotics used to treat MRSA skin infections in lactating women found that older antibiotics like clindamycin and vancomycin are generally safe for breastfeeding infants, as the amounts transferred through breast milk are minimal.
Despite the overall low risk to infants, the limited data on newer antibiotics like linezolid and daptomycin highlights the importance of monitoring breastfed infants whose mothers are treated for MRSA infections.
Excretion of antimicrobials used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections during lactation: safety in breastfeeding infants.Mitrano, JA., Spooner, LM., Belliveau, P.[2009]

References

A simple and more cost-effective antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis. [2013]
Antibiotics in neonatal infections: a review. [2018]
Excretion of antimicrobials used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections during lactation: safety in breastfeeding infants. [2009]
Antibiotics and antifungals in neonatal intensive care units: a review. [2009]
A randomized prospective study of cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. [2018]
Macrolide antibiotics roxithromycin vs. azithromycin for preterm premature rupture of membranes: a retrospective comparison. [2020]
Transcervical amnioinfusion of antibiotics: a basic study for managing premature rupture of membranes. [2019]
A new anti-microbial combination prolongs the latency period, reduces acute histologic chorioamnionitis as well as funisitis, and improves neonatal outcomes in preterm PROM. [2022]
A retrospective review of ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin + clavulanate vs cefazolin/cephalexin and erythromycin in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes: maternal and neonatal outcomes. [2013]
The efficacy of cefazolin plus macrolide (erythromycin or clarithromycin) versus cefazolin alone in neonatal morbidity and placental inflammation for women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. [2013]
[Recent trend for the development of new antibacterial agents]. [2011]
12.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Treatment of infection and colonization caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. [2019]
13.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
In vitro analysis of the minimal inhibitory concentration values of different generations of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus antibiotics. [2023]
[Combined effect of vancomycin or teicoplanin plus a beta-lactam antibiotic in mouse infection models caused by beta-lactam antibiotec-induced vancomycin resistant MRSA (BIVR)]. [2019]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of ServiceΒ·Privacy PolicyΒ·CookiesΒ·Security